Futile batting statlines, in baseball lingo / THU 12-19-24 / Parenthetical on four #1 albums since 2021 / Laser-focused mindset / Sticky treats, in more ways than one? / Hedgehog lookalikes / Nantz's longtime N.F.L. commentating partner / Coding catchall
Thursday, December 19, 2024
Constructor: Brandon Koppy
Relative difficulty: Easy-Medium
Theme answers:
- TUNNEL / VISION (11A: Laser-focused mindset)
- TAYLOR'S / VERSION (22A: Parenthetical on four #1 albums since 2021)
- TERMINAL / VELOCITY (31A: Speed limit, of a sort)
O-fer
Definition
Descriptive of a batter who fails to get a hit in any number of at-bats in a game or series of games. "Bob Buhl owns the worst O-fer in major league history-0 for 88 over two seasons." (Sports Illustrated, June 7, 2004). Davey Johnson, commenting on Rafael Palmeiro (quoted in The Baltimore Sun, Aug. 28, 1997): "If he goes O-fer, he's going to get down on himself." Sometimes spelled "ofer". Syn. O-for; oh-for; oh-fer, 1; 0-fer.Etymology
The term is created from "0 [zero] for," as one would say when speaking of an "0 for 3" game. (Dickson Baseball Dictionary)
• • •
Well you had me ... and then you lost me. Right at the end. Goal line fumble (to use a sports term, which this puzzle *really* seems to like). I guess *I* was the one who fumbled, but it feels like the puzzle fumbled. In short, I thought the revealer execution was garbage, in that it was built exactly like the rest of the theme answers (with Across + Down answers crossing at their first letter), except the "T/V" gimmick was abandoned in favor of ... just an ordinary single letter ("S")? To set up the "T/V" pattern and then arbitrarily break it ifor the revealer (even though You Have Built Your Revealer With Exactly The Same Structure) felt cheap. Like a cheap trick. That "T/V" non-appearance befuddled me way more than the theme itself actually did—I wrote that (erroneous) "T/V" square in pretty quickly when I saw the revealer had the same first-letter-shared structure as the other themers. So the revealer wouldn't come, and then, well, that corner was not exactly the friendliest, with the weird word COYEST (when do you rank coyness?) and the absolutely bonkers clue on GESTATE (60A: Baby bear?)—so if you "bear" ("carry") a "baby," you GESTATE it ... in your womb? Torture. Syntactically, anyway—torture. So I basically irised in on that non-"T/V" square, the shared "S" in SCREEN SHARES, and finally I absolutely had to ditch the "T/V" and then I could see the actual revealer. I know that the revealer clue clearly says "a hint to three pairs of answers," and a "T/V" in the revealer's first square would've made it four, but who goes back and counts? Or even thinks about that number? Bah. That non-"T/V" shared square felt like a let-down and a betrayal, a breach of contract. Also, profoundly anticlimactic, which is sad, because I think the revealer itself is great, and the theme is really well done overall. I mostly enjoyed myself ... until I entered that SE corner, and then—meh and bah and boo.
Leaving the particular structure of the revealer out of it, I thought the theme was clever and well-executed. I particularly like the grid structure—mirror symmetry along the NW-to-SE axis—and the fact that all the "TV"s line up along that axis. Uncovering the gimmick wasn't too tough today. Some bumbling at first in the NW corner (pretty normal), and then—after imagining that [Some mustangs] were T-TOPS (?) and that a [Commoner] was a PEON—I hit 22A: Parenthetical on four #1 albums since 2021 with -AY- in place, and I thought "TAYLOR'S Version! ... but where's the 'version'? ... huh, must not be right." I went back up in the NW corner, got TUNNEL, wondered where "vision" had got to, and then *finally* looked Down, saw the cross-reference, and realized the VISION (and the VERSION) were right there all along, crossing the TUNNEL (and the TAYLOR'S) at the first letter.
A "TV" rebus, cool. And again, SCREEN SHARES is a nice revealer ... just not the way it's executed in the grid, which feels like the COYEST trick I've ever seen (hey, maybe COYEST is a word?). I probably should've made "TAYLOR'S / VERSION" the Word of the Day. Famously, Taylor Swift rerecorded a bunch of her early albums in order to gain ownership of the material. So those rerecorded albums have "(TAYLOR'S VERSION)" appended to their titles.
I pay far less attention to professional sports than I used to when I was a kid (obsessed! with all the majors except hockey, which we did not have in California, then, and which I couldn't be bothered to care about when it finally did come). So sports terminology and slang is generally familiar to me, but I'm very aware that that is not the case for many solvers, so when I see it in droves, in spades, in avalanches, I start to feel for those non-sports folks. Today, I really felt for them when OH-FERS (36D: Futile batting statlines, in baseball lingo) ended up right next to POSTS UP (37D: Hangs out for a while), a bizarrely-spelled (and awkwardly clued) baseball term right alongside what I assume is a basketball term. I mean, there's nothing in the clue about basketball, but the only place I know the phrase POSTS UP from is basketball. To "post up" means "to take up a position against a defender in the post in basketball while standing with one's back to the basket" (merriam-webster.com). Centers or other big men often are said to be "hanging out in the (low) post." If there is some non-basketball meaning of POSTS UP that equates the term with "hanging out," I don't know of it, and neither do the online dictionaries I'm looking at. Insane clue for POSTS UP. [update: Urban Dictionary seems to know this “hang out” definition, and wiktionary has “occupy a position” as its fourth def]. And as for OH-FERS, yikes. I would ... not spell "O" like that. The "O" (said as the letter "O") stands for zero, so putting an "H" on it makes it look *ridiculous*. Apparently someone somewhere decided you could spell it that way if you wanted, but that is not the common way to spell it, and I feel sorry for the undoubtedly many solvers for whom that entire clue and answer was inscrutable. And then to have AND ONE (42D: Free throw after a basket) and the WTA (58D: Org. for Coco Gauff) and Phil SIMMS (14D: Nantz's longtime N.F.L. commentating partner) also in the grid? Even I, a sports non-hater, thought the puzzle was going overboard.
More:
- 6A: Comedian Ken of "The Masked Singer" (JEONG) — me: "how the **** would I know, who even watches that **** show, come on!" Also me, seconds later: "Oh, it's just Ken JEONG. He's on that show? Huh."
- 35A: Sticky treats, in more ways than one? (POPSICLES) — a great clue, and frankly, I'm not sure it even needs the "?"—they do have sticks, so they are stick-y. I know we don't use the term "sticky" that way, but it's Thursday, trust me to figure it out.
- 9D: Burning man? (NERO) — ugh, this one made about as much intuitive sense as [Baby bear?]. NERO (famously, probably apocryphally) fiddled while Rome burned. According to History dot com, "the fiddle didn't exist in ancient Rome." So there's that. But back to the clue—I guess NERO is a man *associated* with "burning"? [Grimace] [resigned headshake] [moving on]
- 33D: Hedgehog lookalikes (ECHIDNAS) — my first instinct is always to spell this "ECHINDAS" (rhymes with "Lindas"?). I don't know why. Also, I just found out that Sonic the Hedgehog 3 opens tomorrow. No idea if any ECHIDNAS are involved, as I can't imagine caring about this franchise at all, for any reason. Like, if you made a movie in a lab specifically designed to keep me away, this would be that movie. If there were an interest level below zero, that would be my interest level. In related news, I'm driving over an hour today to see All We Imagine As Light, a truly awful / forgettable / confusable title, but apparently one of the best movies of the year (the very best, according to Sight + Sound). If there are ECHIDNAS in it, I'll let you know.
Time for Holiday Pet Pics now
(again, this year's submissions are closed, thank you!)
Ruby has had enough of the photo sessions and would like you to just throw the damned ball already
[Thanks, Mark] |
Sadie has also had enough of the photo shoot. She seems calm here, but you can tell that she's about to bust out of there and take Santa with her.
[Thanks, Juliann] |
I know this is the gaze of a dog (Fenway) who just wants you to hurry up and finish your puzzle already so you all can go for a run, but when I look at this sweet face, all I feel is calm. My jaw unclenches, my shoulders relax. All is calm, all is Fenway.
[Thanks, Sarah] |
From Fenway to a couple of more bat-sport pets—the brothers Baseball and Cricket. They spend their days lounging, purring, sleeping, and failing to understand the rules of each other's respective sports
[Thanks, Mike] |
And finally today we have Simon & Scout, seen here taking a much-deserved break from their busy touring schedule for "Simon & Scout's Tap-Dancing Holiday Revue!"
[Thanks, Pamela] |
See you next time.
[Follow Rex Parker on BlueSky and Facebook]
23 comments:
Loved this! Clever and well done. The single letter in the revealed bothered me not at all.
Easy for a Thursday. I got the trick with TUNNEL/VISION, and later on I didn't even have to look at the clue for TERMINAL/VELOCITY with the letters I had in place.
The SW was the hardest corner for me. OHFERS looked ridiculous and POSTS UP was mystifying. Not to mention RHO (could've been TAU, PHI, CHI, PSI) and the DOLE/METE kealoa, where the only crossing Down that came to me easily was ETNA, and that final E didn't help.
I agree with Rex on how ridiculous that GESTATE clue is. Just go with [Bear babies], no question mark and it's the same misdirection but the parts of speech work fine.
About Sonic, actually yes, one of Sonic's PALS is Knuckles the ECHIDNA.
Easy-Medium for a Thursday.
Overwrites:
SnIt before STIR at 24D
SAUcE PAN before SAUTE at 28A
Dope before Deet before DIRT at 34A
AdD ONE before AND at 42D
WOEs:
RUMI at 23D
It took me some time to realize the two ways that POPSICLES (35A) are "sticky."
Sorry Rex, "post up" absolutely can be a synonym for "hang out", loiter innocuously, etc. It's one of the first entries for the term on Urban Dictionary...
Stared at the revealed for a while before removing the TV but the SW corner took much longer. Also had JEOrG / rERO until the end because the name looked right and I’m used to a few answers that don’t make sense, like OHFERS.
I often guess at what will be said/written about in the blog. I’m often wrong and usually way off. Today I guessed the revealer would be a problem and I was right for once. I also agree. Good revealer but bad execution.
Rex, one day you will go see Sonic the Hedgehog 6 because your grandkid will want to see it and you will love it ;)
Another hand up for enjoying the puzzle despite the clunky revealer. Thanks, Rex, for pointing out the unusual grid symmetry — the kind of thing I wouldn’t notice without this blog but am happy to learn about and admire.
Unusually, all the sports terms didn’t bother this non-sporty fellow for once. (The spelling of OHFERS didn’t slow me down, since I’ve never seen any other spelling.) Still, I long for a puzzle full of opera and mycology. Maybe tomorrow…
Hard, but not due to the theme, and not in a good way.
Issues:
Never heard of JEONG.
Did not recognize Arondelle (and I wonder who the non-fictional queen would be).
Never knew spelling bees had ranks.
Never heard of SNO way.
SUN RAY is nonsense: sunbeam, OK; sun's rays, OK; sun ray, nonsense.
I'm supposed to know broadcast partners???
It's ofers, not OHFERS.
Clues for POSTS UP and GESTATE were bizarre to me (never having heard of the urban dictionary defintion of posts up).
maybe posts up also means hangs on a bulletin board? It had me scratching my head too
Agreed! We use it often in my friend circles. You're at a party, don't feel like mingling yet? "I'm just gonna post up right here in the corner and find y'all in a bit."
Puzzle was fun, but if you are going to feature Popsicle Toes (one of my all-time favorites) I would have to insist on the Michael Franks version!
I initially thought the revealer would include the T/V rebus, but that was just momentary. My problem with the revealer was reading “displays” as a verb rather than a noun, so reversing the two words, e.g. SHARES (across) SCREEN. When I couldn’t make that work I took it out and the crosses helped me see the error of my ways.
The other problem for me was SAUcEPAN for SAUTÉ PAN. It took me a while to spot that mistake.
I agree with Rex about the clue for GESTATE being a real stretch (no pun intended). I caught on to the theme fairly early, because TUNNEL/VISION was almost a giveaway. I needed help to spell ECHIDNAS, and a second cheat was SNO (I had "smo" and "seemore" instead of SEENOTE). Overall, a much nicer puzzle than most Thursdays.
My experience was pretty consistent with the consensus thus far - getting the theme wasn’t much of a problem, but a big Raspberry to JEONG, NERO (as clued), ELSA (as clued - give me a break), GESTATE and ECHIDNAS. Those are just some godawful clue/answer combinations. The editor should have his license suspended for a week.
It’s a little Shakespearean (in the tragic sense) - these grids have so much potential, but the crew at the NYT can’t help but shoot themselves in the foot on a daily basis with these absolutely bizarre clue/answer combinations, which are totally self-inflicted and so unnecessary.
Great Puzzle! Thanks, Brandon! 16 minutes, which is probably easy-ish for me on a Thursday. Took me a while to get the happy music cuz I had OkOK instead of OHOK at first (misspelled ECHIDNAS as ECkIDNAS--pronounced the same after all). Anyway, enjoyed the puzzle, put the T/V in for the revealer just like @rex but didn't take too long to see it was going to be screen shares.... Didn't get the "sticky" pun ("stick-y" would have made it more obv) til I got to the blog... enjoyed the puzzle lots, fun idea.
This one made me feel more annoyed and cheated rather than satisfied by the conclusion. Easily falls into the top five worst NYTXWs of the year.
I thought ESTATE right next to GESTATE was worth a mention 😏
My favorite moment was when I got fooled. I had filled all but the SE, and there were those three T/V’s in a gorgeous straight line coming down from the NW, so, before filling in anything else in that quadrant, I confidently plopped in another one in square 45 and spent serious time trying to make it work.
When I finally saw that it was wrong, I let out a huge “Hah!” at being mightily taken. I get gotten like that often, and my reaction is almost always, “Well played! You got me good!” I love when that happens.
Other things I loved today:
• An answer set loaded with pop, with one out of every four answers having appeared in the Times puzzle four times or less over its 80+ years.
• The fresh grid design, with its not-often-used diagonal symmetry, and with its high number of black squares (even higher than the average Monday) combined with its low word count (equivalent to a Saturday).
• ESTATE over ESTATE in the SE.
• That clue for ANI, a Times puzzle answer more than 600 times, but never before today with the “no I in team” angle.
When there is so much to love, as there was today, I am most grateful. Thank you, Brandon, for making this!
He won’t love it. But he ‘might’ not tell the kid that their taste in movies is god awful!!
OHFER is pretty disqualifying, especially when you have OHOK sitting right there. There is just no reason for an H to be anywhere in that word/answer.
I figured the revealer would be different from the themers so I didn’t put the TV in there and finally got SCREEN SHARE from the crosses mostly. Very grateful that my daughter loves ECHIDNAS for some reason. No idea how that happened. Maybe the Wild Kratts. And lastly, although I don’t watch any sports, it would be hard to grow up in the 80s and not be able to parse Phil SIMMS, and I have heard “oh for two”” etc, So I could figure that one out, even though I’d never seen this context. And if you read any news at all, you’ve probably heard of the tennis player, Coco Gauff, but whatevs. Didn’t seem crazy on the sports lingo to me. I have not heard the term POSTS UP colloquially or in sports, so to me it sounded like you posted a notice for a while somewhere and then took it down! Still got it. Nothing terribly hard and I thought overall, cute clueing. Fun theme!
A line I love from RUMI:
“You are not a drop in the ocean. You are the entire ocean in a drop.”
Post a Comment