Budget airline of Ireland, informally / WED 7-15-26 / Narrator on "Euphoria" / Liam Neeson action trilogy / Ben Jonson wrote one to himself / Bold way to go when bluffing / Name repeated in a hit 1963 rock song / Giving up one's amateur status / Mork's planet on an old sitcom

Wednesday, July 15, 2026

Constructor: Jonathan Raksin and Jeff Chen

Relative difficulty: Easy

THEME: SPEEDCUBER (56A: Competitor suggested by 17-, 23- and 45-Across) — three theme answers are punny descriptions of speedcubing (i.e. competitive Rubik's Cube solving), and then there's a kind of mock-up of a Rubik's Cube in the middle of the grid, with nine letters forming a 3x3 square (one side of an implied "cube"), with those letters unscrambling to spell the name of the Cube's creator: ERNO RUBIK. You have to "solve" the "cube" in the middle yourself, I guess:

Theme answers:
  • TURNING PRO (17A: Giving up one's amateur status) (speedcubers are professional turners, of a sort)
  • MAD SCRAMBLES (23A: Frantic rushes) (speedcubers ... well, I would've said they 'unscramble' madly, but whatever, close enough)
  • FLYING COLORS (45A: Something it's good to pass with) (Rubik's Cubes have brightly-colored sides, so presumably the colors "fly" when you solve them quickly)
Word of the Day: SPEEDCUBER (56A) —

Speedcubing or speedsolving is a competitive mind sport centered around the rapid solving of various combination puzzles. [3] The most prominent puzzle in this category is the 3x3x3 puzzle, commonly known as the Rubik's Cube. Participants in this sport are called "speedcubers" (or simply "cubers"), who focus specifically on solving these puzzles at high speeds to get low clock times and/or fewest moves. The essential aspect of solving these puzzles typically involves executing a series of predefined algorithms in a particular sequence with pattern recognition and finger tricks. // Competitive speedcubing is predominantly overseen by the World Cube Association (WCA), which officially recognizes 17 distinct speedcubing events.[5] These events encompass a range of puzzles, including NxNxN puzzles of sizes varying from 2x2x2 to 7x7x7, and other puzzle forms such as the Pyraminx, Megaminx, Skewb, Square-1, and Rubik's Clock (until 2027). Additionally, specialized formats such as 3×3×3, 4×4×4, and 5×5×5 blindfolded, 3×3×3 one-handed (OH), 3×3×3 Fewest Moves, and 3×3×3 multi-blind are also regulated and hosted in competitions.

As of February 2026, the world record for the fastest single solve of a 3×3×3 Rubik's Cube in a competitive setting stands at 2.76 seconds. (wikipedia)

• • •

Did the makers of Rubik's Cube pay for this puzzle? What a weird niche thing to build a puzzle around. I knew there were speed-solving competitions, but SPEEDCUBER? Yeah, I'm not familiar with your slang, fellas. Not that that held me up at all today. I didn't solve the puzzle in 2.76 seconds (the world record for ... speedcubing, is it?), but it went by pretty fast, as most of it was composed of incredibly boring, completely ordinary fill. An avalanche (I'm gonna need new metaphors here) ... a landslide? ... of the most dull-as-ecru 3-4-5s I've ever seen. IPA ARIA TESSA UAE ISAY ERIE ADO RARER ODE ASTO ICET EST ALLIN ALIT ORATE OMIT APED IBIS OVA  ... its' like the puzzle was trying to put me to sleep. Hardly. There are only four non-theme answers longer than 6 letters. For me, this was like solving the world's plainest and easiest themeless, except for the revealer, which did its job, but ... it hardly seems worth it. The theme answers are kind of cute as punny descriptions of what speedcubing must be like, though MAD SCRAMBLES feels a little less apt than the others. Is the solver "scrambling" to solve it? Is the idea that the colored squares on the Cube are all "scrambled" up and the solver has to unscramble them? The exact meaning of that one feels ambiguous and slightly off in a way that the other two do not. Anyway, if you just take the thematic bones of this puzzle, I think it's OK. But the bulk of the puzzle felt like an afterthought. Total snooze.


I haven't cared about the Rubik's Cube since it first came out, when I was about 11. I think of it as a fad toy that stopped being popular years ago, but ... apparently there's this whole world of competitive solving I know nothing about. By "whole world" ... I don't know how big we're talking. But the Speedcubing wikipedia page is astonishingly, painfully long and detailed, so however niche that world is, it appears to be, uh, well established. I know something about niche hobbies, and niche competitions. I have the trophies to prove it. Nothing wrong with nerdy niche worlds. It's just ... I don't expect speedcubers (or anyone, really) to know about crossword speedsolving, and yet this puzzle expects me to know and care about speedcubing. That's a no on both counts for me. Still, I know what a Rubik's Cube is, so the basic concept here wasn't mysterious. The theme answer placement felt a little weird to me. It's not—it's just a arrangement of long Across answers, but that's the thing: because the puzzle centers around a cube and its turning sides, I wanted those long Downs to be themers, so that there'd be one themer on each side, evoking the square shape of a cube. In fact, when I was done, for a few seconds, I thought those long Downs were theme answers, and I was struggling to understand what PEDAL POWER or POETRY SLAM had to do with speedcubing. "I guess there's 'power' involved ... and maybe you 'slam' the cube down when you're done? Is speedcubing supposed to be 'poetry' in motion? Is the act of turning the cube sides called 'pedaling'?" So many questions flashing through my brain. Then I realized the themers were just arranged in a standard all-Across way, and those long Downs were ... irrelevant.


The only answer that held me up at all today was RYAN (42A: Budget airline of Ireland, informally). I have almost nothing written on my printed-out grid today except for next to the clue for RYAN, where I have scrawled a double-underlined "TF?" (that's the "TF" from "WTF"). I'm supposed to know a discount Irish airline? Sorry, the informal nickname for a discount Irish airline? Apparently, yes, I am. It seems that RYANair is a way, way bigger enterprise than I could've imagined: 
Ryanair is an Irish ultra-low-cost airline headquartered in Swords, County Dublin, Ireland. It is the largest airline in Europe by scheduled passengers carried, fleet size, and total flights. Globally, it is the largest airline by international passengers carried, the third-largest by market capitalisation behind Delta Air Lines and United Airlines, and the fifth-most profitable by net income. In 2025, the company sold 208 million airline tickets, averaging €70 in total revenue against €62 in costs per ticket sold. It is widely considered to be the cheapest airline operating in Europe. (wikipedia)
So I learned something today. I learned about a popular business that "consistently scores poorly in customer satisfaction ratings" but thrives nonetheless. Inspiring.


Bullets:
  • 14A: One of approximately three million in Finland (for a population of less than six million) (SAUNA) — when I say America should follow more of a European social model, this is what I mean. You gotta admire a country this committed to health and relaxation. 
  • 21A: Name repeated in a hit 1963 rock song (LOUIE) — wrote in "LAYLA" here (seven years off).
  • 20A: Ben Jonson wrote one to himself (ODE) — it's a poem in which he takes himself to task for ... not writing poetry. Writing about how he's not writing. The poem opens with him beating himself up for not being more productive—basically a version of the voice in every self-loathing writer's head: "Where dost thou careless lie / Buried in ease and sloth?"
  • 31D: Narrator on "Euphoria" (RUE) — I "know" this only from crosswords. It gets kind of densely pop-culturey in the middle of that damned cube: RUE, ORK, TAKEN clued as the Liam Neeson franchise. I doubt there's enough pop culture confusion there to scuttle someone's solve, but still, you might've taken RUE or TAKEN in a different, less name-y direction, just to be sure.
  • 55A: One flying in to the coast, maybe (GULL) — so glad to find out this was just a bird and not some person flying into California to do business or take a vacation or whatever.
  • 37D: Vampire double feature? (FANG) — A great clue, but maybe a better clue for FANGS, plural. I mean, yes, you can lawyer your way to a defense of singular FANG, but that "double" really wants FANGS. One FANG, double it, now you've got FANGS. Man, that word looks weirder and weirder the more you type it, so I'm gonna stop.
That's all for today. See you next time.

Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld

[Follow Rex Parker on BlueSky and Facebook and Letterboxd]
=============================
❤️ Support this blog ❤️: 
  • Venmo (@MichaelDavidSharp)]
=============================
📘 My other blog 📘:

Read more...

Novelty dance with comical elbow-flapping / TUE 7-14-26 / Ancient fortress overlooking the Dead Sea / Corrupting sorts, in an orchard metaphor / Folded French pancake / Assistant with a whisper mode / Traditional sumo hairstyles / Hired soldier, in slang / Tea with tapioca pearls / Lake bird with a laughing call

Tuesday, July 14, 2026

Constructor: Gus Bloxham and Bharati Hemmady

Relative difficulty: Easy (undersized grid, 14x15)

THEME: OFF COURSE (58A: Heading the wrong way ... or, interpreted culinarily, a hint to 15-, 21-, 35 and 47-Across) — familiar phrases or names that sound like a "course" (i.e. food) that has gone "off":

Theme answers:
  • BAD APPLES (15A: Corrupting sorts, in an orchard metaphor)
  • SPOILED BRATS (21A: Nightmares for nannies)
  • ROTTEN TOMATOES (35A: Movie review site with a percentage rating scale)
  • FUNKY CHICKEN (47A: Novelty dance with comical elbow-flapping)
Word of the Day: MASADA (7D: Ancient fortress overlooking the Dead Sea) —

Masada (Hebrew: מְצָדָה məṣādā, 'fortress'; Arabic: جبل مسعدة, romanized: jabal musayda, lit.'mount museida') is a mountain-top fortress complex in the Judaean Desert, overlooking the western shore of the Dead Sea in southeastern Israel. The fort, built in the first century BC, was constructed atop a natural plateau rising over 400 m (1,300 ft) above the surrounding terrain, 20 km (12 mi) east of modern Arad.

The most significant remains at the site date to the reign of Herod the Great, King of Judaea under Roman administration c.37–4 BC, who transformed Masada into a fortified desert refuge early in his rule. He enclosed the summit with a casemate wall and towers, and constructed storerooms, an advanced water system, and bathhouses, along with two elaborate palaces: one on the western side and another built across three terraces on the northern cliff. These palaces remain among the finest examples of Herodian architecture.

Masada is most renowned for its role during the First Jewish–Roman War (66–73 AD), when it became the final holdout of Jewish rebels following the destruction of Jerusalem. [...] 

The surrounding Roman siege works and bases remain visible and are among the most intact examples of Roman military engineering. Today, Masada is a UNESCO World Heritage Site due to those siege works, and one of Israel's most popular tourist attractions, drawing around 750,000 visitors a year. (wikipedia)
• • •

Short write-up this morning (probably?) since I gotta be out of the house pretty early today for an appointment in Syracuse (an hour+ away). I need to be done with the write-up ahead of time (i.e. well before 6am) in order to preserve my sacred "Drink coffee and do nothing" time, which will otherwise get impinged upon by the stupid appointment. You understand. I am in the weird position today of finding myself liking this puzzle despite the fact that the theme has a few things about it that are just, well, off. Two big ones, both having to do with consistency. With three of today's theme answers, the "courses" do not fundamentally change meaning if you imagine them as food. Apples, tomatoes, chicken—they all retain their basic meaning if you imagine them as an "off course." Yes, you change the context of the word (esp. for CHICKEN), but you don't fundamentally change the meaning. The FUNKY CHICKEN involves the imitation of a chicken. That's different from chicken that has gone off, but the basic meaning of "chicken" is the same. But BRATS?! To make your food meaning work, you have to change the meaning of that word completely, not to mention the pronunciation. Brats (rhymes with "cats") vs. brats (rhymes with "cots"). That's an existential change, whereas the others are mere contextual shifts. Apples are apples are apples, but SPOILED BRATS are not sausages (although ... I have a modest proposal ... hear me out!). 


The second issue with the theme is that BAD APPLES and ROTTEN TOMATOES are already about food that's gone off. That is, the revealer doesn't really change their meaning much at all. Those “courses” come pre-turned. BAD APPLES is a metaphor that comes from ... literally BAD APPLES. And ROTTEN TOMATOES, same. The revealer doesn't require much (re-)imagination where those answers are concerned. Whereas with SPOILED BRATS and FUNKY CHICKEN, the revealer provides a lot more transformational zing. "Spoiled" and "funky" really change meaning. The shift from spoiled kids or a silly dance to bad food is an abrupt and surprising one, making those answers far more enjoyable and clever than the other themers. And yet even at half power (i.e. with the revealer only really transforming two of the four theme phrases), the theme still made me laugh, still gave me an aha. Turning those kids and that dance into rotten food—that's the kind of bizarre "TA-DA!" I can get behind on a Tuesday.


One more annoying thing about the theme, though. Not about the theme per se, but about the cluing on a couple of the theme answers. Why is the puzzle giving (awkwardly) all this extra information that the solver does not really need? Take the clue on BAD APPLES (15A: Corrupting sorts, in an orchard metaphor). "In an orchard metaphor"? You don't need that phrase at all, and if you're thinking "well, it's Tuesday, we should provide a little more direction," then you could just use "in a metaphor." "In an orchard metaphor" is just ridiculous. It kind of implies that "orchard metaphors" are some kind of category we're all familiar with, that there will be many such metaphors to choose from. "Orchard" is unnecessarily specific and hand-holding, as is "interpreted culinarily" in the revealer clue (58A: Heading the wrong way ... or, interpreted culinarily, a hint to 15-, 21-, 35 and 47-Across). That clue could easily go straight into "or a hint to etc." In fact, it should. Stop treating solvers like idiots. The puzzle remains easy without your falling over yourself pointing the way to the correct answers. Let solvers work it out! Larding in all these "helper" phrases is just insulting, not to mention stylistically inelegant. 

[BUSTA!] (31A: Rapper ___ Rhymes)

No real difficulty today. I had SNOUT for SNOOT (39A: Schnozzle) and I didn't know (or forgot) MASADA. That was about it for trouble spots. Oh, no, PAPER CUT, that one definitely got me (8D: Slice of Life or nick of Time?). "Of" is doing some pretty heavy, awkward lifting in that clue. I also got slowed down at the clue on "OK. SO?" because the clue did not make sense, to my ear (45D: "All right. What's the big deal?"). "All right. What's the big deal?" sounds like something you say when you genuinely want to know what the big deal is. Like, someone shouts for you to come see something and they're getting impatient and finally you walk in and are like "All right. What's the big deal?" I.e. show me the big deal. "OK. SO?" implies that you have seen the alleged "big deal" and found it wanting. Somehow the clue doesn't quite get at that. Or, it does, but only if you read the clue with a very specific inflection. I think I just hate "OK, SO?" as an answer. Throw it on the rubbish pile of "OH"- and "UH"- and  "UM"- and "OK"-starting phrases. 


Bullets:
  • 38D: Hired soldier, in slang (MERC) — from "mercenary," even though I think you pronounce MERC with a hard "C." There's a renowned movie makeup artist from the mid-20th century named PERC Westmore, and every time I see his name in the opening credits (and I see it A Lot—just yesterday, in fact), I think "... Purse? Perk? What are we doing here?"
  • 1D: Campsite crasher in the Rockies (BEAR) — weird to specify "in the Rockies" since presumably BEARs crash campsites all around the world.
  • 24A: "We come in peace" speakers, in a sci-fi trope (ALIENS) — 2x sci-fi answers today, as we get not only space travel (here) but time travel as well (8A: Destination for some sci-fi travelers = PAST)
  • 33D: Lachrymal unit (TEAR) — this is what the ALIENS say when they see you crying. "The human is releasing lachrymal units despite the fact that we come in peace. Abort mission! Abort mission! Oh, General Doxmerc is going to be so mad ..." 
That's all for today. See you next time.

Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld

[Follow Rex Parker on BlueSky and Facebook and Letterboxd]
=============================
❤️ Support this blog ❤️: 
  • Venmo (@MichaelDavidSharp)]
=============================
📘 My other blog 📘:

Read more...

  © Free Blogger Templates Columnus by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP