Showing posts with label Stephan Prock. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stephan Prock. Show all posts

Spoiled girl in "Finding Nemo" / TUE 2-17-26 / Physicist Wolfgang who proposed the "exclusion principle" / Material in a classical timepiece / "Oh, that stupid little punk ..." / Workout inspired by martial arts / Tough-but-loving fathers, informally / Leafy side dish rich in vitamin K / Flavoring in an earthy whiskey

Tuesday, February 17, 2026

Constructor: Stephan Prock and Jeff Chen

Relative difficulty: Easy

THEME: BAROQUE (39A: Music genre for the words hidden in this puzzle's circled letters ... or a punny description for them?) — circled letters contain forms of music associated with the BAROQUE Period ("genre"?); those circled letters are "broken" across two answers (hence the "punny description"=> BAROQUE = "broke"):

Theme answers:
  • ALBINO RAT / ORION (oratorio)
  • SNAFU / GUESS SO (fugue)
  • PERSONA / TAE BO (sonata)
  • LURCH / ORAL EXAMS (chorale)
Word of the Day: Wolfgang PAULI (52D: Physicist Wolfgang who proposed the "exclusion principle") —

Wolfgang Ernst Pauli ([...] 25 April 1900 – 15 December 1958) was an Austrian–Swiss theoretical physicist and a pioneer of quantum mechanics. In 1945, after having been nominated by Albert Einstein, Pauli received the Nobel Prize in Physics "for the discovery of the Exclusion Principle, also called the Pauli Principle". The discovery involved spin theory, which is the basis of a theory of the structure of matter.

To preserve the conservation of energy in beta decay, Pauli proposed the existence of a small neutral particle, dubbed the neutrino by Enrico Fermi, in 1930. Neutrinos were first detected in 1956. [...]

In quantum mechanics, the Pauli exclusion principle (German: Pauli-Ausschlussprinzip) states that two or more identical particles with half-integer spins (i.e. fermions) cannot simultaneously occupy the same quantum state within a system that obeys the laws of quantum mechanics. This principle was formulated by Austrian physicist Wolfgang Pauli in 1925 for electrons, and later extended to all fermions with his spin–statistics theorem of 1940. (wikipedia)
• • •

This is more a two- or two-and-a-half-star puzzle, but I bumped it up because it made me think of Bach, whose music I love, and it took a giant swing with that terrible pun, which I don't love, but I do respect. The problem with a theme like this is there are no real theme answers (besides the revealer). That is, there's no thematic unity among any set of answers. The musicality exists only by accident, by the arrangement of letters in non-musical answers, so the whole thing ends up playing rather like a themeless (and in this case, a very dull / easy themeless). The grid has some potential as far as interesting answers go (six different Downs of 7 or more letters), but those all come in pretty flat. Meanwhile, the rest of the grid has a dreary, olden feel to it. "NEATO, an EDSEL! You don't see many of those these days. OK, time to go to my TAE BO class, byeee!" I'd also say that the added OPERA content (including the crossreferenced ARIAS) was a bug, not a feature—you have a musical theme but no musical themers ... but then you add musical content non-thematically? And BAROQUE music at that (Monteverdi's L'Orfeo = 1607 = early BAROQUE). I don't love it. Seems sloppy, or at least inelegant. 

[Roy Lichtenstein, Go For Baroque, 1979]

I have two other music-related objections to this puzzle. Well, not "objections," exactly, more ... questions. A couple of things struck me as odd. First, I would never have thought to call BAROQUE music a "genre." To me, that word describes music from a specific time period (~1600-1750), not a "genre." Also, as far as "sonata" goes, I associate that form most strongly with the (later) Classical period (~1750-1820), not the BAROQUE. I see (now) that the term "sonata" existed in the BAROQUE period, but it's not until the Classical period that it "takes on increasing importance": 
The practice of the 
Classical period would become decisive for the sonata; the term moved from being one of many terms indicating genres or forms, to designating the fundamental form of organization for large-scale works. This evolution stretched over fifty years. The term came to apply both to the structure of individual movements (see Sonata form and History of sonata form) and to the layout of the movements in a multi-movement work. In the transition to the Classical period there were several names given to multimovement works, including divertimentoserenade, and partita, many of which are now regarded effectively as sonatas. The usage of sonata as the standard term for such works began somewhere in the 1770s. Haydn labels his first piano sonata as such in 1771, after which the term divertimento is used sparingly in his output. The term sonata was increasingly applied to either a work for keyboard alone (see piano sonata), or for keyboard and one other instrument, often the violin or cello. It was less and less frequently applied to works with more than two instrumentalists; for example, piano trios were not often labelled sonata for piano, violin, and cello. (wikipedia) 
There are sonatas in the BAROQUE period, so there's nothing technically "wrong" with including it among today's musical form, but the other forms feel very closely associated with the BAROQUE period specifically, whereas the sonata (to my admittedly untrained ear and cursory understanding of music history) doesn't.


I wasn't really paying attention to the circled squares, even after I hit BAROQUE, so as I say the puzzle played like a rather disappointing themeless. I could see that BAROQUE was the revealer, but I didn't notice what was going on until I was already finished, and even then, it took me a few beats to figure out what was "punny" about BAROQUE (you really have to imagine some emphasizing your brokeness; there's "broke," and then there's two-syllable "buh-roke," which is obviously worse). Seeing all the BAROQUE(-ish) music forms made me slightly happier than I'd been while solving, and then that pun ... it did not make me happier, but it definitely made me groan, which is, as I understand it, the singular purpose of a pun, so ... half-star bump for the pun. I am nothing if not generous.


No difficulty today except for the two names: specifically, the fish and the physicist (which sounds like the title of a popular book on physics, or else a fable by Aesop). This puzzle overestimates how much I remember about the full cast of Finding Nemo (a now-23yo movie). DARLA is the 20th (!?) listed role on the wikipedia page for this movie. This is the first time DARLA has been clued via Finding Nemo. Historically, Our Gang / Little Rascals has been the go-to frame of reference. I can see how one might wish for something more ... current. There have been a couple forays into the Buffy-verse, but otherwise, it's Alfalfa's sweetheart as far as the eye can see. There's a dearth of DARLAs, darlin' (it's a great name; more people should have that name; back in the late 20th century, I very briefly dated someone named DARLA ... I can't say her name wasn't part of the appeal; we went to see Shakespeare in Love ... and that's all I can remember) (I don't even remember the movie, frankly).


Bullets:
  • 4D: "Oh, that stupid little punk ..." ("SON OF A!") — someone used this once as a crossword answer and now it lives in everyone's wordlist and I don't love it (anymore). The clue is also not really on the money—it's not partial enough, not interrupted and sputtering enough. You need something more incomplete. "Why I oughta...!" — something in that vein.
  • 7D: Daniel of the "Knives Out" movies (CRAIG) — the latest installment, Wake Up Dead Man, was fantastic. I got to see it in the theater, in that brief period that Netflix allowed it to run in theaters. The place was packed, or nearly so. The only movie I saw last year that was better-attended was Sinners. I don't consider movies "movies" unless they have a theatrical run. I could barely bring myself to stream Nouvelle Vague (which I really liked, but resented not being able to see on the big screen). On TV (and esp. on Netflix, Apple, Amazon), "movies" just seem like more "content," no matter how well made they are. (Somehow, in my brain, this does not apply to old movies—how else am I going to see (most) old movies?) (I love you, Criterion Channel!). Release the movies! Let them be big!
  • 58D: Material in a classical timepiece (SAND) — ah, the classical time piece, a great step forward from the time pieces of the BAROQUE period (when they measured time not in SAND but in gravel, or the blood of their enemies).
Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld

[Follow Rex Parker on BlueSky and Facebook and Letterboxd]
=============================
❤️ Support this blog ❤️: 
  • Venmo (@MichaelDavidSharp)]
=============================
✏️ Upcoming Crossword Tournaments ✏️
=============================
📘 My other blog 📘:

Read more...

Onetime Volvo competitor / THU 12-4-25 / Tourist hot spot in Uttar Pradesh / Also + Frozen water / Precocious literary resident of the Plaza Hotel / Clutch producer / Letters on Ivan Drago's tracksuit in "Rocky IV" / When tripled, a 1962 Elvis movie title / Traditional roofing material for a Cape Cod-style house

Thursday, December 4, 2025

Constructor: Stephan Prock and Jeff Chen

Relative difficulty: Easy-Medium (themers were the only tricky part)


THEME: Connections — two answers are linked by a (shaded) word meaning "link," resulting in a longer, unclued answer:

Theme answers:
  • TOOK NOTICE (17A: Also + Frozen water)
  • NINETIES KID (24A: Three squared + Slide)
  • CARAMEL DELITE (36A: Italian "darling" + Top-shelf)
  • CREEPING OUT (47A: Northern tribe + Toe trouble)
  • CARBON DATE (57A: Auto + Consumed)
Word of the Day: CARAMEL DELITE (36A) —
Vanilla cookies topped with caramel, sprinkled with toasted coconut, and laced with chocolatey stripes. (ABC Bakers)

• • •

Hello. First off, congratulations to Eli Selzer (who did the write-up Tuesday) for his impressive showing on Jeopardy! (also on Tuesday). He didn't win, but he sure as hell won the first half—built up a huge lead only for the champion to come storming back late in the game. Penelope and I both went "Noooooooooo!" when Eli said "Ozarks" instead of just Ozark. That was the cruelest mistake. But he knew so many things I never would've gotten. And I don't know how all you Jeopardy! people are so fast on the draw. I see the answer and I'm like "Oh, oh, it's that cat ... what is ...? ... ugh, you know ... not a cougar ... kinda looks like one ... it's black ..." [time expires] "Sorry, sir, the question is 'Who was George Washington?'" "Dammit!" I hadn't watched Jeopardy! in ages, and it was kinda fun. But only because someone I knew was on it. Gonna return to not watching it now. 


This puzzle didn't make much sense to me. I like a theme without a revealer if the core tenets of the theme are clear, but they weren't perfectly clear to me today. So ... we get two ultra-dull clues linked by a "+" and that "+" is supposed to represent the word in the shaded squares. Those shaded words are all verbs (or nouns, I suppose) meaning "unite," "fuse," something like that. And then, in each case, you get one long unclued answer. The whole premise felt shaky to me—not a tight enough connection between "+" and whatever was in those shaded squares; and those shaded words didn't feel like the tightest set, either. And I don't really believe NINETIES KID is a thing any more than any other decade + KID is a thing. Was I a SEVENTIES KID or an EIGHTIES KID? An argument can be made either way, and either way, neither one of those really belongs in a puzzle. Also, I had absolutely no idea what a CARAMEL DELITE was supposed to be. Zero. Figured it was a type of ice cream. Had to look it up after, only to discover it's basically the same thing as a Samoa (Girl Scout Cookie). Unclued answers are already operating from a joy deficit. They really need to sing. There's no pleasure in having neither a clue (as in, the clue is missing) ... nor a clue (as in, I have no idea what this answer is). The shaded squares don't always break across the two elements of each themer, either, making for an inelegant execution. "KID" and "OUT" are sitting in their respective answers completely unconnected, left out of the bonding scheme entirely. I realize the bonds are only supposed to "bond" the two clued answers (e.g. NINE and SKID), not the words in the longer phrase (e.g. NINETIES and KID), but still, when the "tie" is not "tying" the elements in the longer answer together, it looks funny/failed. Three of the answers manage to get it right, but NINETIES KID and CREEPING OUT miss. This feels like a first draft of an idea. There's potential here ... but the final product doesn't feel fully baked.


The fill is, once again, unfortunate. Bad enough that I stopped to take a screenshot before I ever got out of the NW:


As you can see, I messed up my stupid three-letter Star Wars answers because it's all crosswordese to me (it's REY Skywalker and Kylo REN, sigh). That answer + ELOISE and SERTA and "I LOSE" had me in DOOMER mode. And sure enough, the crosswordese came in buckets: SAAB AGRA OPI BAE ... and that's just the adjoining section. IMPEI, plural HORAS, that Fox ("cable," nice try) News guy NEIL (of all the NEILs, why that NEIL??) ... UGLI, indeed. The NE and SW have very solid colonnades of 7/8-letter answers—those parts, I liked. The rest didn't do much for me.


The only difficulty today was parsing the themers. That REY-for-REN mistake was easy enough to correct, and I don't remember any other missteps except USSR for CCCP (10A: Letters on Ivan Drago's tracksuit in "Rocky IV"). I did need several crosses to get MELON (33D: Noggin), but on a Thursday, I'd expect to "need several crosses" to get many answers, and that just wasn't the case today.


Bullets:
  • 1A: Traditional roofing material for a Cape Cod-style house (CEDAR) — I wanted SHALE (?) and THATCH (which wouldn't fit). 
  • 22D: Clutch producer (HEN) — a group of eggs laid by a HEN is called a "clutch."
  • 49D: When tripled, a 1962 Elvis movie title (GIRLS) — not an Elvis film title that leaps to mind. I couldn't get the VIVA part of VIVA, LAS VEGAS out of my head. "VIVA VIVA VIVA!"—not a movie title. The part of my brain occupied by "GIRLSGIRLSGIRLS" ... has been taken (I think this means I'm definitely an EIGHTIES KID, for better or, in this case, worse):
  • 15A: Tourist hot spot in Uttar Pradesh (AGRA) — location of the Taj Mahal, which, if you have solved crosswords for any length of time, you damn sure know
  • 57D: Greenhorn (CUB) — couple of old-fashioned synonyms for you. I have never heard CUB used in this way except when followed by the word "reporter." I'm much more apt to use "greenhorn," which is a funny word. Curious about its etymology. Here we go ... according to someplace called etymonline (I'm just going to assume it's legit): 

greenhorn(n.)

mid-15c., "horn of an animal recently killed," also "young horned animal," from green (adj.) in sense of "new, fresh, recent" + horn (n.). Applied to new soldiers from c. 1650; extended to any inexperienced person by 1680s.


That's all. See you next time.

Wait, one more thing: For The Next Week Only, I will once again be accepting ...

🌲🐈Holiday Pet Pics🐕🌲

... continuing what is now apparently an annual tradition of posting pictures of readers' pets in "holiday" settings (whatever that means to you). Send your pics to rexparker at icloud dot com. Please include your pet's name, as well as any info you think relevant. I'll post several of them a day in the run up to Christmas and (likely) through the New Year. Here's a teaser for you:

[Christmas crime scene ... Santa's body was never found]
[Thanks, Lesley (you didn't give me kitty's name!)]

Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld

[Follow Rex Parker on BlueSky and Facebook and Letterboxd]
=============================
❤️ Support this blog ❤️: 
  • Venmo (@MichaelDavidSharp)]
=============================
✏️ Upcoming Crossword Tournaments ✏️
=============================
📘 My other blog 📘:

Read more...

  © Free Blogger Templates Columnus by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP