THEME: FINALIZE (49A: Wrap up ... or a phonetic description of 17-, 19-, 25-, 41- and 54-Across) — the "FINAL" parts of the theme answers have variations on the "-IZE" sound:
Theme answers:
DAILY HIGHS (17A: Warmest figures in weather forecasts)
SAMURAIS (19A: Japanese warriors who rose to power in the 12th century)
"BEHIND BLUE EYES" (25A: 1971 hit from the Who that begins "No one knows what it's like to be the bad man")
AS THE CROW FLIES (41A: By a very direct route, idiomatically)
IN DISGUISE (54A: Wearing a wig and sunglasses, say)
The concept for Coco is inspired by the Mexican holiday Day of the Dead. Pixar began developing the animation in 2016; Unkrich, Molina, and some of the film's crew visited Mexico for research. Composer Michael Giacchino, who had worked on prior Pixar animated features, composed the score. With a cost of $175–225million, Coco is the first film with a nine-figure budget to feature an all-Latino principal cast.
My feelings are kinda lukewarm about this one. Very old-fashioned theme, not very inspired or creative or imaginative or interesting. The "-IZE" sounds are all spelled differently, that's something. And AS THE CROW FLIES is a very nice answer on its own. But there's not much joy in seeing a bunch of like sounds, and FINALIZE isn't exactly scintillating, as wordplay goes. I also thought DAILY HIGHS was pretty weak. As that answer came into view, as I was solving Downs-only, I was very hesitant to accept it. Entered the letters only tentatively. It feels awkward in the plural. Defensible, sure, but just doesn't sound like a thing people say. The others were fine, just fine, but thematically, this just didn't have much snap. If the grid as a whole had been really strong, maybe I would've have noticed or minded the so-so theme, but when SLOUCHER (?) is your top longer answer, and when you're leaning on stuff like OLD SAW and WUSS and AOL and a boatload of other short stuff, then there's not really anything of interest going on *besides* the theme. So that's it. Blah. Not mad, just disappointed. Final rating: "AW, DARN."
This was one of the easiest NYTXW puzzles I've ever solved Downs-only. I didn't get every Down at a glance, but the ones I didn't get fell pretty quickly once their neighbors went into the place and the Acrosses started to fall. OLD SAW and WUSS made up the one notable trouble spot—their adjacency being part of the trouble. OLD SAW is a term I only encounter in crosswords, and it's so old itself that I don't think I've ever heard it used except quaintly / ironically. This makes it very *unlike* its clue, [Maxim], which is just a regular old word. So OLD SAW did not leap to mind there. WUSS also didn't leap to mind. That's another word that feels like it belongs to bygone days of olden yore. So, things slowed down a little there, but once the middle two themers went in, everything between them filled in pretty quickly, and so OLD WUSS SAW being a pretty small obstacle after all. Other answers that didn't come right away included EXALT (I wanted ADORE) (26D: Put on a pedestal), IDOL (I wanted TIKI, even though the thing is literally called the "Immunity IDOL") (51D: "Survivor" immunity token), and "AW, DARN" (I wanted ... well, a lot of things, including "OH" up front and then "GOSH" or "DANG" or "DRAT" or some such mild oath on the back end) (5D: "Shucks!"). Also, I balked hard at AOL (8D: Yahoo alternative). Is that answer ... correct? Current? Is AOL still around? Is Yahoo? I feel like Yahoo is and AOL isn't, for all practical purposes, anyway. In what year am I supposed to imagine AOL as an "alternative"? Holy *&$%, aol dot com is a thing? Still? Who ... how ... why? Wow, you learn (and then quickly forget) so many things writing this blog. Only way I'm using aol dot com is if its searches return only URLs from 1997. A time-traveling portal, back before search engines weren't ruined by SEO and ads. I don't care if it's inefficient. I just want to remember when the internet seemed cool and full of wondrous possibility. But seriously, aol dot com? In 2023? I'm mildly shocked it's a thing—and I still don't believe it's a real "alternative" to Yahoo, or anything.
Lastly, minor issue, but I would've given COCO a different clue. In most situations, the Pixar clue is just fine, but in this case, when the answer is crossing yet another animated motion picture (39A: MOANA), I think you wanna ... you know, add more colors to your palette. Broaden your frame of reference. COCO Gauff just won the damned US Open, so she seems like a perfect candidate here. There's always Chanel, but I think this puzzle needs a jolt of currency and relevance, so I'm pro-Gauff here. I'm pro-Gauff most days. Enjoy your first weekday in October. See you tomorrow.
A long time ago, I was solving this puzzle and got stuck at an unguessable (to me) crossing: N. C. WYETH crossing NATICK at the "N"—I knew WYETH but forgot his initials, and NATICK ... is a suburb of Boston that I had no hope of knowing. It was clued as someplace the Boston Marathon runs through (???). Anyway, NATICK— the more obscure name in that crossing—became shorthand for an unguessable cross, esp. where the cross involves two proper nouns, neither of which is exceedingly well known. NATICK took hold as crossword slang, and the term can now be both noun ("I had a NATICK in the SW corner...") or verb ("I got NATICKED by 50A / 34D!")