IGN's #1 Video Game Console of All Time / WED 9-7-22 / Potables in kiddush and the Eucharist / "___ Diaboliques," 1955 Simone Signoret film
Wednesday, September 7, 2022
Constructor: Ekua Ewool
Relative difficulty: Easy? (11:07)
Hey besties! It's your pal Malaika, here for another Malaika MWednesday. I solved this puzzle after a downright luxurious meal of Korean barbecue + craft cocktails. On the train home I listened to this song and this song.
THEME: The NYT Crossword! — How solvers might feel while solving the puzzle
Some excellent non-theme fill in this, like LAVA CAKE and DO THE DEW, and even shorter stuff like ENIGMA and SESAME. And I like the shape of those curvy tendrils of blocks emanating from either side of the grid. And, obviously, I like the reminder that you should Google answers you don't know. That's my number one rule of crosswords, and I feel like now its been endorsed by the Times themselves! Happy Wednesday, everyone!
Bullets:
THEME: The NYT Crossword! — How solvers might feel while solving the puzzle
Theme answers:
Congrats to Ms. Ewool on her debut! This puzzle had a lot of little NYC factoids, so I got to feel cool and special for filling them in easily. (Stolen valor, perhaps-- I've only lived here for four years.) LEX is between Park and Third, which, by the way, I hate. Why can't we just commit to numbered avenues??? I also hate how tenth just randomly turns into Amsterdam. (Sorry, that's not related to this puzzle, now I'm just thinking about my Manhattan Geography Quibbles.) I didn't get tripped up on the terse and mis-direct-y [JFK alternative] for LGA. And I put in RINKS (winter sights at Rockefeller Center and Bryant Park) with no crosses. But wait, circling back, can we talk about the new fountain, I mean water feature, at LaGuardia airport???? Oh my god. I watched it slack-jawed for like thirty minutes. Better than television.
- Newbie crossword solver's thought on a Monday: I'VE GOT THIS
- ... on a Tuesday: WISH ME LUCK
- ... on a Wednesday: I'D LIKE SOME HINTS
- ... on a Thursday: WHAT IN HELL
- ... on a Friday: GOOGLE TIME
In 2009, she appeared in Armando Iannucci's BBC Films political satire In The Loop, co-starring with Peter Capaldi, Tom Hollander, Chris Addison, James Gandolfini, and Mimi Kennedy, a quasi-spinoff of Iannucci's BBC TV series The Thick of It.[15] She plays Liza, a State Department assistant in the movie. From 2012 to 2019, Chlumsky played Amy Brookheimer, aide to Julia Louis-Dreyfus's character in HBO's Veep, also produced by Iannucci.
• • •
The theme entries were missing a little something for me.... a little sparkle, a little dazzle. Is it fair of me to ask to be dazzled every single day at 10pm? Perhaps not. But in particular, it feels a little meh when a term seems to be adjusted in order to have the correct amount of letters. For example, I think a more natural phrasing is "I need a hint" or "I'd like a hint," but neither of these have fifteen letters, so instead we get the phrase ID LIKE SOME HINTS. Of course, it's tough to tell with these conversational phrases. I still remember when we had #discourse about whether it's called "apple cider" or "hot cider" or "hot apple cider."
Also... (time for me to get grumpy!!) I don't really like how in the TCCU (This Crossword Cinematic Universe), the NYT puzzle is the only one that exists. Look-- I totally get that the (vaaast!) majority of crossword solvers in the US solve one or fewer puzzles a day, and that puzzle is the Times puzzle. But still.... We've got the USA Today and Universal puzzles, which are easy every day of the week. And the New Yorker, which is easiest on Friday and has their Monday puzzle as GOOGLE TIME. (What are LAT and WSJ like? I actually don't solve theirs daily.) As someone who solves many puzzles, the clues were factually wrong to me, and I feel the Times is usually such a stickler about that kind of thing.
(No mention of the Saturday or Sunday puzzle, by the way-- seven theme answers were probably too many to fit into a weekday-sized grid!)
Some excellent non-theme fill in this, like LAVA CAKE and DO THE DEW, and even shorter stuff like ENIGMA and SESAME. And I like the shape of those curvy tendrils of blocks emanating from either side of the grid. And, obviously, I like the reminder that you should Google answers you don't know. That's my number one rule of crosswords, and I feel like now its been endorsed by the Times themselves! Happy Wednesday, everyone!
Bullets:
- [Item of wear named after an island] for BIKINI — I was discussing monokinis with my friend, and that led us to wonder if bikinis were genuinely called that because they have two ("bi") pieces. (They are not, as this clue indicates.) This is, I believe, an instance of "rebracketing" where words are assumed to have a certain etymology (e.g., BI / KINI) and then altered according that (incorrect!) composition (e.g., MONO / KINI).
- [Bank statement abbr.] for INT — This really slowed me down because I know INT as an abbreviation in programming (for the integer datatype). I was thinking more along the lines of end-of-month or year-to-date.
- [Like Legos, originally] for DANISH — I thought this was kind of a funny way to think about the toy. I suppose it's referring to the fact that they were invented in Denmark? But at what point did they stop being Danish? Also, are we going to fight in the comments about whether the plural is "Legos" or "Lego"? Go forth, I suppose.
P.S. In the past, I've had people ask why my grid looks blue-- When I "check puzzle," it turns the correct letters blue. Anything I add between "check puzzle"-ing and successfully solving, stay black. (In this case, you can see my error was at TIMID-- I originally had "humid.")
[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]
[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]
123 comments:
How is lga misdirect-y?
Googling is only endorsed for newbie solvers in this puzzle, boo googling answers
Hi Malaika, thanks for the amazing fountain video and the BIKINI etymology observations. Re googling: I don't google to get answers (unless I've given up, which is pretty rare), but I often google answers gotten from crosses that are WTFs (== I don't recognize them)... it is highly educational.
A fun theme; I agree that I'D LIKE SOME HINTS is not a great on-the-money phrase. But what a nice debut by Ekua Ewool, and what a cool sounding name she has.
After my brother died, I kept in touch with his girlfriend and she always made LAVA CAKEs for my visits. She now has a new guy so fewer visits, and no more lava cakes. Miss them both. And the cakes.
One writeover on a fast solve: KMART before KOHLS. We used to have KMarts here in Canada, but they disappeared many years ago. Like Sears, but less missed. Never even seen a KOHLS.
[Spelling Bee: Tues 0... 1:23 (that's 83 seconds) to pg, and a little over 6 min to QB. Probably fastest ever!]
Hi Malaka,
I got my Mom a subscription to your weekly puzzle a while back and she loved it! Nice to see you out here with your warmth and wit! I guess I will have to check here on Wednesdays more often. I checked today to see if Rex savaged the constructor for leaving out Sat and Sun. And here you welcomed them, before gently pointing out these foibles and others. I think I can learn some lessons in civility from your approach. Cheers!
Hah. We were all once noob solvers. Fun to remember the trepidation building as the week progressed. I can remember sitting with a Saturday, writing in a couple of hopeful S’s here and there, and then calling it a day.
Malaika – add Brendan Emmett Quigley’s themeless Mondays for some more GOOGLE TIME.
Sure, I’ve seen the word temerity, but for the life of me I had no idea what it meant. I think I had “tired” and “tepid” before TIMID.
“Khols” written vertically in my grid lucked just fine, thankyouverymuch. @jae – you, too?
I don’t suffer from a fear of heights, but I’m perfectly content to view the Grand Canyon from the RIM and not one of those EVIL glass floor shelf thingies. I get dizzy even typing this.
BAR could be clued same as SET. Maybe. Sometimes. I think I’d rather, to quote David Sedaris, “shove upholstery tacks into my gums” than sit at a bar and listen to some guy talk about how he likes to people-watch, is good judge of character, can be a little stubborn, and has a crazy family. Isn’t anyone original anymore?
I kept thinking about WAVED. Greetings fascinate me. It occurred to me that you can (at least here in the US) smile and greet a stranger in passing, but if you WAVE to said stranger, then he will panic and wonder how he knows you. Weird. But. . . in the south you absolutely can WAVE from your car to strangers sitting on their porch. I’ll chew on this and get back to you.
DESERT – I heard recently on this nifty podcast, Stuff You Should Know, that a DESERT doesn’t have to have sand. It just has to have hardly any precipitation, if I remember correctly. Actually, most deserts do not have sand, and the world’s biggest desert is Antarctica. Put that one in your pipe and smoke it. I guess those camels really have to bundle up and wear serious HATs.
Hold your HAT and MELEE share the grid. I’m still processing and am exhausted, but let’s just say that we had about a bunch of police at school yesterday. I was mightily blocking my closed door to about 14 temeritous students who wanted in on all action occurring just on the other side.
When I first started doing the nytxw (back in ‘99 when we first move to the US), there was no Google so I’d solve it with a thesaurus and an atlas book next to me; everything else I didn’t know (quite a lot!) I’d make a mental note or write it down in a notebook when it was a recurring word (what later understood to be crosswordese).
It took me years to move confidently down the week, and a lot of persistence and self confidence (and googling, my favorite go-to teacher) to finally tackling Fridays and Saturdays. So, I relate to this puzzle and I like it a lot 👍🏽 😊
Medium-tough. The NE took some staring plus KEKE was a WOE and who before GOD didn’t help and @okanaganer neither did Kmart before KOHLS. Delightful, this reminded me of when I first started doing these back in the 2000 aughts. I wore out two crossword dictionaries and had google on speed dial. Great debut an quite worthy of the Xwordinfo POW. Liked it a bunch!
@lms - I got KOHLS right this time (after erasing Kmart) because GENOME.
Gladwell’s 10000 hour rule definitely applies to crosswords.
I liked the concept behind this theme. But not until reading LMS's and MexGirl's posts did I really think to reflect on my own solving journey. I'm 59 ½ years old and I started around age 10, helping my mom and grandfather do the TV Guide crossword. Shortly after, I moved on to Games magazine where most of the puzzles — crosswords, acrostics, logic problems, cryptic crosswords, etc — were initially way beyond my pre-teen ability. But I plugged away. Yes, those hopeful S's! And yes, the pre-Google reliance on the thesaurus and almanac and atlas! I think it was as much a part of my education as school was.
My puzzle-solving life is flashing before my eyes — crosswords, cryptics, Boggle, Mastermind, Jeopardy, Trivial Pursuit, Wordle, and so many others! And I got pretty damn good at all of 'em. And all of that led to a career as a professional namer (of products, companies, film and TV, etc). What a nice, unexpected trip down memory lane!
Thanks Malaika for another great write-up (and an opportunity for this late-night west coaster to get in on the commenting party!) 🤠
Thank you, Malaika, for the LGA video. Maybe it's not the hell hole it used to be. Maybe.
Overwrites:
9A farm before SHoP before SHIP at 9A
wALL (thinking the Vietnam Memorial) before MALL for the D.C. tourist spot at 38D
And the lovely and talented kealoa as AM I before SO AM I at 40A
This was a bit cloying but a pleasant enough solve. I can’t say I ever thought any of those things as a new solver, with the exception of the first encounter with a Thursday rebus.
We've all been there (or are there) so this puzzle should be in everyone's wheelhouse. A great puzzle, and a debut to boot. Congrats, Ekua!
This had all the fun of a quote puzzle and less. That's two theme stinkers in two days. How awful the rejected puzzles must be.
Nice puzzle. Congratulations to the creator. I had "IRES" instead of "IRKS" for a long time. Otherwise I found it fairly easy, but fun.
I remember when I thought that nobody actually solved the Saturday puzzle, that perhaps some showoffs filled in the grid from answer sheets – maybe in pen – and walked around holding the newspaper with the puzzle showing. That it was all some kind of evil inside joke. Thoughts like that sprouted from my absolute inability to make even tiny inroads on the Saturday puzzle.
Time and persistence over years changed my outlook, but I’ve never forgotten those humble beginnings, and here, Ekua gloriously rekindled that newfer state of mind, brought me right back. Yes, there I was back then, huh-ing and what-ing, discouraged yet motivated, daunted yet refusing to buckle.
What a gift, this puzzle, to whoosh me into a former me, to exactly how it felt – and to make me smile all over.
The puzzle echoed the theme too. There was piece o’ CAKE Monday, I MIGHT Tuesday, TIMID Wednesday, EVIL Thursday, and ENIGMA Friday. There was the overarching framework: INNOCENT to ELITES. How do you get there? DO THE DO!
Oh, I did like passing through that unusually high count of five palindromes and three four-letter semordnilaps (EDAM, KITS, EVIL). But those and other sparks played second fiddle today to the sweet memories evoked by the theme, viscerally reminding me of the remarkable Crosslandia side trip that runs parallel to my life and continually enriches it.
Thank you so much for your puzzle, Ekua, and congratulations on your debut!
Malaika nicely explains why some answers in her grid are black and some are blue. But they are all blue.
Odd to clue “I Do” as “START of courtroom oath”? What is the rest of the oath?
LAT is like the NYT in that it increases in difficulty throughout the week and Sunday is a different type of grid altogether.
How do rate this puzzle “easy”, and post a time of 11 minutes, when you technically didn’t complete it? In my mind checking the puzzle is a DNF, at least from a time and difficulty perspective.
Cute - not too much pushback. I had more agita with WHAT IN HELL than ID LIKE SOME HINTS. I try to stay clear of GOOGLE. Adding the F to the recent BEE EATER is neat.
31a could just as easily be “trees”.
Couple of convenient plurals - no idea on KEKE. Another learning moment this week with HONDURAN.
INNOCENT When You Dream
Enjoyable Wednesday solve.
Curious about whether or not Wordle players use hard mode. I always do. 96% success rate, Avg. 3.9
Wordle 445 4/6
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨
🟨🟨⬜⬜🟨
🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
The clue on Lego is incorrect. First, the Lego Group will remind you (constantly) that they are Lego *bricks.* “Legos” May he commonly used, but it is incorrect. Lego is an adjective. Also Lego is still danish, so I don’t like how the “originally” implies that it no longer is.
Since the puzzle is in the NY Times, I don't have a problem that the puzzle is NY Times-centric. I really liked this puzzle. Fresh and fun theme. Congratulations, Ekua!
The LA Times weekly format is similar to the NY Times, except that the Friday puzzle is also themed. But Monday is the easiest and Saturday is the hardest. I believe the Washington Post only has an original puzzle on Sunday. The Post runs the LA Times puzzle the rest of the week.
Wordle 445 4/6*
🟦⬜⬜⬜🟦
⬜⬜🟧🟧🟦
🟦⬜🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
Given the progression this was about as good as possible.
Missed opportunity to have posted Howlin' Wolf's "Do the Do":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-4h3Ahzs6c
Nice self-referential theme that reminded me of being in high school, having to write a composition, and writing a composition about writing a composition, and I bet a fair number of y'all have done that too.
I could walt to a KOHLS from our condo, and it seems like they mail us a flyer every week announcing another sale, featuring X% off. I wonder if anyone shops there when there's not a sale. Seems like it would be hard to do.
Put me in the Senior Solver (Seasoned Solver? Veteran Solver?) group since I've been doing these for over fifty years, That means I agree with Anon 2:06 about googling, but I do not judge those who want to. It's supposed to be fun, after all, and definitions of fun are intensely personal.
Congrats on a fine debut, EE. Elegant Execution of an appropriate theme, and tanks for all the fun.
Malaika, why get “grumpy” because the constructor directed an NYT related theme to people who are literally doing the NYT puzzle? Seems like you are easily grumpied.
@Anon7:43: "solemnly swear ..."
Errata on my comment: Erase KITS from the semordnilap list (I was thinking "skit"). Sorry!
Delightful theme = delightful puzzle. Charming. Fun.
Right off the bat, "blogs" at 4A. REI won't stay in my head because I've never heard of it beyond these grids, never been to one, never seen one. Nevertheless, nice clue. A longer solve time than usual, and I'm not sure why. Maybe I was busy savoring the theme answers.
Malaika, thank you for that video of the fountain at Laguardia. Stunning! How do they DO that? Actually, as with magic tricks, I don't want to know. I like being dazzled.
I understand now why less experienced solvers sometimes comment about the condescending attitude of more experienced solvers.
Wow. That fountain. Thanks Malaika. In Denver we have a giant blue plastic horse with red eyes. Almost everybody hates it.
I would say, generally speaking, today's theme is correct, with one major exception -- for me everyday is Google time. No days are "I've got this." And the purpose of this blog is to answer all of my "What in (the) hells."
Another delightful solve with only a wee bit of help from Uncle G on Chlumsky. I am devastated they didn't clue it as "Elsa's sister," but apparently the NYTXW editors read this blog and have heard all the crying about Frozen.
I know Amy ADAMS, but double checked her last name. I would've needed help on KEKE, but crosses saved the day.
IRA for INT made GENOME tough to find. SHOP for SHIP obscured INNOCENT. I've never heard of ENOLA Holmes, so maybe I'll study up today. It's a great name.
I love having LAVA CAKE and BIKINI in the same puzzle and like them in real life too. BIKINI comes after GIZMO but before ENIGMA on my favorite words list.
I imagine Division 1 players are ELITES to everyone except players in Division 2 Division 3 Division 4 Division 5 Division 6 dot dot dot.
Uniclues:
1 Elsa telling her sister she'll take care of the world's crossword needs.
2 Division 1 player telling her family what channel is interviewing her.
3 Redwings suck.
4 Soda CEO demands a new slogan.
5 WW participant's only wish.
6 My priorities, in order.
7 Still having most of your red blood cells.
1 "I'VE GOT THIS ANNA."
2 "ESPN. WISH ME LUCK."
3 RINKS CHANT
4 "REVISE 'DO THE DEW'."
5 EXEMPT LAVA CAKES
6 BIKINI. GOD. (~)
7 INNOCENT ANEMIA
By beef here is with the editor on clue 28D, since Bikini is an atoll not an island. Also a little overly heavy on entertainment names…
I watched the LaGuardia video briefly. All I saw was a waste of money.
Amy: very fresh and well put together puzzle. 5 theme answers and a Dad Joke (snail's turtle ride)! Clever clues. RIM reminded me of doing rim to rim to rim at the Canyon in 2019.
@Anonymous 8:38--No roses to go with your bread, huh?
@Lewis
That was a brilliant 4th paragraph. I totally missed that.
Temerity is just the opposite of timidity perhaps to the point of foolishness. Its usage seems mostly limited to a few stock phrases. Perhaps because it doesn't convert to an adjective or adverb. It does have a plural temerities which I've never seen or heard in the wild. Boldness? Temerities? I can imagine the reaction here.
JFK alternative? Did she mean political misdirection? RMN HHH?
Surprised there is anything new at LaGuardia.
Fun little meta-NYTCW. The NYT part going unmentioned bothered me not one iota.
Wordle 445 4/6
⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨
🟩⬜⬜⬜⬜
🟩🟩⬜🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
I don’t use “difficult” mode. I might try it tomorrow …
Thought the puzzle was cute. And agree with the comment upthread that given the puzzle is the NYT puzzle, more than reasonable to run the clues as relating to, well, the NYT puzzle!
Too many Hollywood names/refs but all easily ascertained from perps for me.
Yes, we're going to hash it out about the Lego clue.
It's not ever "legos". Ever. This is directly from the company themselves.
The plural of Lego is Lego. Or, if you must, 'lego bricks'.
I have a Lego set. The set contains lots of Lego bricks.
In fact, I have a whole room set aside for all my Lego.
Also, why "originally"? It's still a privately-owned located in Billund, Denmark. I just visited Lego House last month in Billund and saw the museum. 100% Danish even today (although they manufacture the pieces in several countries around the world now.)
@ Anonymous 8:35 am
It is both. Bikini is an atoll, but the largest island in the atoll is also named Bikini. It was on Bikini Island that most of the population lived prior to their removal.
So while it was in the lagoon of Bikini Atoll that the nuclear testing took place, it was Bikini Island that was the population center.
Think New York, New York
i'm with @Son Volt: what in the hell is "what in hell"?
@wordler. Yep, l also use Hard. But in any case it’s counterintuitive to me to also use 2 as a guess.
What an adorable idea for a theme! But even better than the theme phrases themselves is the fact that this puzzle follows that famous writer's dictum: "Show, don't tell". Because as we move from Monday to Friday, the puzzle gets notably harder -- at least it did for me. Not exactly Friday-hard at the bottom, but harder than it was at the top.
Since I mute all commercials -- or fast-forward through them when I've pre-recorded programs -- I don't know slogans like DO THE DEW. I didn't know KEKE either, so this was the hardest section for me. I assume the clue refers to Mountain Dew, but that's not what I thought of when the answer came in. Back in the day, "Duggan's Dew" was a low-priced alternative to Dewars Scotch-- quite possibly made by the same distiller and with a very similar taste, but not as smooth. It was something I tended to DO a lot. Yum.
I gather this is a debut puzzle. Very cute, very imaginative, very original. I suspect this constructor has a very bright future.
Thanos wasn’t EVIL so much as stupid. The problem he saw was real, but his solution would never work. And he was incapable of seeing that it couldn’t work.
Really, really did not like the theme today.
@Wordler 7:57. I stopped using hard mode after my only (to date) failure, in which I had four letters in the correct place after my first guess, and had seven possibilities for the last letter.
At a certain point just refuse to Google. Set the puzzle down. Walk away. Come back to it later. Suss it out. Googling is a DNF. We all know it. Believe in yourself and you will solve it. That’s how you leave Noobdom. And once you set that resolution for yourself you will get better at solving those Saturday challenges and BEQ Mondays and New Yorker Mondays and even Croce’s and Zawistowski’s challengers much quicker than you would by looking things up.
When did that point happen for me? Probably a good six or seven years into regularly doing the NYTX. But I think it could have been much sooner. My only exception to this is when the PPP gets excessive, when a puzzle has stopped being a crossword puzzle and become a crossname puzzle. Then I really don’t care that I have a DNF.
Corporate Hegemony can go to hell. “Lego Bricks” was shortened into the noun “Lego” decades ago and we can pluralize it any way we please. Same with Toyota holding a vote and then declaring Priï (Look Ma, three tittles, no hands!) the “official” plural of Prius. As if “Priï” was some corporate ad goon’s idea. No. Prius owners had already decided and Toyota was turning the joke into marketing. As if anyone ever should pay attention to the opinions of corporations. Ever. Besides, the plural of Prius is actually Priopodes. And the plural of Lego obviously has to be Legopodes.
Yikes!
Hey All !
Where in hell is the complaints about WHAT IN HELL,? Isn't it missing the "The?" WHAT IN THE HELL. Or even WHAT IN HELL IS THIS? To me, that's the term that needs adjustment. ID LIKE SOME HINTS is fine.
Anyway, neat theme idea. Would the answer for "Newbie crossword solver's thought on a Saturday" be - "Nancy's wall looks tempting"? 😁
Speaking of "solver's", is that correct? @LMS? Is it supposed to have the apostrophe? Or be just "solvers"? Or solvers'?
OOXTEPLERNON cousin today - SETBAR TETREI.
Enjoy your debut, Ekua, can I use either part of your name if I'm stuck on a piece of fill? Har
Nice Longs in NE/SW corners. Couple writeovers, V__I-ISAW, who-GOD.
Happy Hump Day, y'all.
No F's (I SAW none)
RooMonster
DarrinV
WHAT IN HELL is probably my least favorite in the grid, but otherwise it was a fun solve. Seemed like the puzzle was winking at the solver.
Nice debut puzzle, nice write-up!
I was proud of myself for getting LEX right off the bat—took me a long time, it seems, to get straight the Manhattan Avenues between 5th and 3rd. Also liked being reminded that LGA has a brand new look—looking forward to seeing it myself, though for years EWR has been my go-to airport for NYC, because that’s where the most Southwest flights land, and train transit into town is inexpensive and convenient.
I take exception to the implication that only newbs (noobs?) turn to GOOGLE on Fridays. After many years of solving I have come to know some of the short proper names that are “out of my wheelhouse” but are used commonly enough to have become crosswordese (Exhibit A: Issa Rae), but it’s still common for PPP clues to stump me, certainly more so in late week puzzles. I suppose I get more of them now without help because of greater facility in getting more cleverly clued crosses, but it’s a rare Friday or Saturday (or Sunday) that doesn’t send me a-googling. And I continue to aver (and avow) that this is nothing to be ashamed of. Much better, IMO, to be able to soldier on and be challenged by the word play (with which Google seldom helps, or is needed) than to give up because of gaps in factual knowledge of things I generally have no interest in (though I do sometimes learn something of interest from the googling). I justify myself in part by thinking that in many cases the constructors must have been equally ignorant and relied on received word lists or Google themselves.
LBJ?
All I could think of was "solemnly swear."
Outstanding idea for a theme! Amazing someone hasn’t thought of it before. Quite an impressive debut too. Congratulations Ekuwa! Sure hope you are busy constructing more. I’m looking forward to solving them.
KOHLS has been in the news a lot lately and sadly about another long established brick and mortar business struggling to survive. My first experience with the company was in their Madison, Wisconsin grocery store and I remember they had wonderful fresh sliced bread in their bakery. At that time, early 1980s, there was also one department store in the city, three today.
ANNA Chlumsky was adorable in her very early role as Vada with a young Macaulay Culkin in the film My Girl.
This was tough for me because my slowing brain doesn't think this way. If you say Where Many Hands Are At Work, I need the answer to coordinate with the At something. At Ship didn't occur to me.
Lava cake doesn't melt, the baking doesn't solidify it.
Bikini isn't an Island. It's a coral reef, and known from the nuclear testing days as Bikini Atoll.
But these are fine points in cluing that editing would solve, and with the theme I could feel a fun and lively mind at work and way more sparkle than you see on Tuesdays. Give us more like this on Tuesdays.
@Lewis, you nailed it today.
I'm willing to let the NYT Xword refer to itself without specifying that it is, and I'm willing to grant islanddom to BIKINI. Several articles of clothing are named for islands, but usually the island is adjectival: Bermuda shorts, Capri pants. I can't think of another stand-alone garment.
I used to do searches when I was learning. If I hadn't, I might never have found this blog. One way you know an answer is obscure is if your first hit starts "Rex Parker does the NY Times Crossword Puzzle." I won't do it for the NYT anymore, but I don't hesitate when facing some trendy pop culture clue in the New Yorker, AVC, or Inkubator. And when it comes to cryptics, I don't even feel that it's cheating.
@Loren, I live in New England, where we don't wave at strangers -- unless we're on a boat! To alter the old rule, "the ocean is an introduction."
I spent way too much time on Caesar's boast, wondering if it would be "veni" or "vidi" -- I even filled in the V, but then I saw ATV and realized my error.
That fountain is amazing! I had to change at LGA a few years ago, and even then it was much improved from its earlier years.
Gotta run. Getting a new kitchen stove delivered. The old one was disconnected from the gas line yesterday, so I had the fun of cooking a swordfish stead on a waffle iron. It turned out pretty well.
For the dyslexic it's the same difference.
Thx, Ekua; well done! :)
Hi Malaika, good to see you again; thx for your write-up! :)
Med, time-wise, but seemed harder.
Thot I might need SOME HINTS on this one.
New to me: LEX, KEKE, LES, HONDURAN, DANISH, KOHLS.
Enjoyed Millie Bobby Brown on 'ENOLA Holmes' and 'Stranger Things'.
Love Amy ADAMS; have watched a number of her movies lately, but not 'Enchanted'. Cued it up for later today on Disney+.
A most enjoyable adventure! :)
@stephanie (10:57 PM yd)
Excellent explanation re: repeat letters. I look for these HINTS/cues all the time in Duotrigordle. :)
___
Peace 🕊 🇺🇦 ~ Compassion ~ Tolerance ~ Kindness to all 🙏
@JD 10:09am
Bikini Island is the largest island and was the principal population center (before the removal and relocation of residents) on the Bikini Atoll.
Think New York, New York
Enjoyed the story that the grid tells and especially liked GOOGLE TIME. Wonder why the Sunday puzzle didn’t rate a response. For me, it would be something like “Oh, God, not this again.” Sorry, Sunday, but you’re usually just too much of a slog.
Not so with this Wednesday GEM. Fun and engaging. Congrats to Ekua on the debut.
Also loved the fountain video.
I thought the puzzle today was fun and even had a bit of crunch! Since I’ve been working the puzzle a number of years now I admit I’ve learned a lot about NYC (besides trips there) from the NYT crossword so no problem today with the NYC/NYT-centricity in my mind.
@LMS…you nailed it for me and the “hopeful s’s” when I started doing Saturday puzzles!
@Zed, me thinks you may be a bit tongue and cheek with your non-Googling stance. I mean, sure I mostly refuse to Google but if I’m in a sub-optimal mood or feeling rushed that day, I have NO guilt taking a DNF to “finish” a puzzle.
@anon 2:04…Malaika added a “y” to the end but yeah, I would think the only possible other alternative to JFK would be RMN.
As for the rim of the Grand Canyon, at the age of 23 my then boyfriend/now husband took me (with his brother and friend) on a 6 day backpack rim to rim hike. I had never backpacked. I think I charmed him with many things that trip. By first insisting I would sleep on top of a picnic table at Phantom ranch after having seen a rattle snake, some long yellow/black striped snake and finding out that one of the site’s rangers had just been helicoptered out due to a scorpion bite. After my husband pointed out that snakes could crawl up picnic tables, I proclaimed that even though it was hotter than hell, I would sleep IN the tent with the zipper closed. Last but not least, starting up the rim on the switchback trail the burros use before dawn, when we got to the “rest area” about halfway up I asked a ranger if I could rent a burro to go the rest of the way up. Having been told NO, I then semi-seriously asked my future husband what a helicopter ride up might cost. Well. I think you can see that he realized at this very point that I was a KEEPER!
@Zed's first paragraph is spot on. We have the same experience with words and names that don't instantly pop....Get up from your Lazyboy/girl chair, take a walk with your pups, feed them and then stare.
Like many of you, I only did the Sunday NYT puzzles. They would take me days to finish. I'd use a dictionary and one of those puzzle answer books. I learned words like ULU and OGEE and all about MEL OTT, how to spell OUTRE, the names of strange capital, lakes and mountains.....the list is endless. My little book was well worn and dog eared. Eventually I had the nerve to tackle Thursday, Friday, Saturday. I found this blog and it gave me encouragement. @Rex was a life saver...as were the bloggers here (especially @Lewis). Finally got up the nerve to toss out "My Little Book of Cheats" and try it on my own. With patients and some time, it can be done....I did it! I still struggle mightily on Saturday (especially with names)... but that's what I like.
This was a nice Wednesday puzzle. I didn't need any hints but I almost stared too long at ANNA and ADAMS. I'm still hoping for a nameless puzzle. My favorite Thursday retort is always WHAT IN HELL and then I come running to the blog.
Congratulations on your debut, Ekua (love your name)...I hope you make more funsies like this one.
Like most this puzzle had me going back over my own history with the NYTXW. I got into it back in the late 80s when I got into the firehouses. In Chicago we worked 24 hour shifts and there was a lot of time to kill between calls. The Tribune was the higher brow paper but it was the more tabloid Sun Times that carried the NYTXW. From the get go Mon-Wed we're boring-ly easy and I eventually did only Thu-Sat. The Sun Times did not carry the Sunday puzzle.
While I would usually get the late week puzzles they could be extremely difficult. The firehouse is a bit like prison and I was able to work on those puzzles off and on throughout the whole day. Of course there was no Google and I had no way to cheat. This forced me to develop my own methods of solving to work around things I had no way of knowing. I'm better than average with trivia and I soon realized that what I couldn't recall I could recognize with only a letter or two. Cracking a tough Saturday had a built in reward that was addictive.
The novelty wears off of everything and nowadays my puzzling has become much more focused on the SB however a good late week puzzle can still rekindle my crossword enthusiasm.
Today's solve was a bit below average for a Wednesday.
yd -0, dbyd -0, Sun -0
My favorite comment so far this morning. "How awful the rejected puzzles must be."
Minimum sparkle, half-baked theme, 29 Terrible Threes (the most I can remember). Ugh!
The DESERT/WINES cross makes me wonder if they are sweet wines without the sweetness.
OTOH, WHATINHELL crossing EVIL is demonic.
After watching Coco Gauff tonight, I wanted to ask @Nancy and the other tennis buffs whether you think Coco Gauff likes Coq au Vin.
Five palindromes seems unusual. I’m a left coaster, so @Lewis will beat me to this and may even find more than my cursory post-solve once-over revealed (ERE, ANNA, TET, DAD, EKE).
Great debut, Ekua Ewool. I liked following your oh-so-familiar progression through the increasing terrors of the puzzle as the week advances. Keep those puzzles coming, please!
Thanks @L. Réard. Google seems to be torn about that but you're right.
Hand up for saying What the hell over What In Hell. But What in Hell makes sense. Regional maybe.
Thank you for calling out the terrible, non-existent WHAT IN HELL.
Yer average masked crossword solver's thoughts about this here puz:
1. Fun theme. Like.
2. Luv that 9-D SNAIL clue!
3. 29 weejects, includin all of rows 6 & 10. Appreciate all them choices. staff weeject picks: (L/N/W)ES.
4. Editor's thoughts whenever gettin an M&A puz submission: REVISE. (Altho WHATINHELL often also applies.)
5. Newbie crossword solver's thought on a Saturday: EVIL?
6. Newbie crossword solver's thought on a Sunday: ENIGMA? … or … WAVED?
Thanx for the fun, Ms. Ewool darlin. And congratz on a primo debut.
Masked & Anonymo1U
**gruntz**
Very name-heav; put "KATE" before "KEKE."
EKUA: I just realized I misspelled your name in my earlier post. Sorry about that.
@pablo (8:04) “Does anyone shop at Kohl’s when there are no sales?” Good question. I’ve done it but it’s not as much fun as finding the bargains with my +30% off coupons. I have noticed that when they do a Kohl’s Cash promotion where the “cash” can only be spent during a specified window of time, the markdowns are not nearly as generous during that period.
@Beezer (10:51) Loved your Grand Canyon story. I think hubby was probably sold by your versatility and resourcefulness. 😄 Just seeing the rattlesnake would’ve been enough for me. My story is not nearly as exciting. My husband told me that he knew he wanted to marry me the first time I suggested we stay home and watch a football game on television instead of going out to eat. We had pizza and beer on TV trays in front of my 19” black and white TV and it turned out to be the first of many sporting events we took in together.
I liked the puzzle just fine. Cute theme. I won’t nit pick about if a phrase has to have a ‘the’ or leave out a ‘some’. It didn’t distract enough to detract from the solve, IMO. However, I did find the many ‘I’s a bit disturbing. There are a whopping 21 of them by my count. And three of those are as the personal pronoun “I”. I’ve got this. I’d like some… . So am I. I guess that rule of thumb is totally out the window these days. Pity. I also had no clue on most of the names and thought I might have to google, but crosses all bore out. I use Google my last resort, and I do consider it DNF when I do that, but when it’s names, I don’t feel so bad, since I’d still like less PPP in my grids, period. I am also working my way through the archives whenever I have the time, and it’s amazing to see the change/evolution in the Shortz era. Back in ’94 and 95’, say, there are second cousins of violin-makers, and brothers of 16th century Flemish painters galore! I rarely get past a Wednesday level on those without a google or two, even after years of crosswording. But, I tell myself that it’s a hobby for fun, so if I’m not too hard on myself for the googling, I can get enjoyment from it. Though I will admit that there is a definite boost of pleasure to get a grid, any grid, purely from gray cells.
So, yes, thanks Ekua Ewool , for s pleasant puzzle. I, like many other commenters, did enjoy the trip down memory lane of what it was like to dive into the NYTxw world. I will never forget the first word I learned from crosswords when I had hit the reveal button: YEGG. Definition: a safecracker. Try working that into casual conversation. Can't hardly do it without learning to ignore the sideways glances and eye rolls it elicits.
Ah, crosswordese! How I love you.
I feel like it's a misconception that late-week puzzles are hard because you don't know enough facts or hard words. More often, I find the challenge is figuring out what it's asking because there are misdirects or wordplay or because the clue is so short that you don't know what form of the word is meant. So Googling doesn't get you far - although maybe a newbie would think so :)
As for the brouhaha on Lego vs Legos, I have something I came up with to explain why Legos sounds wrong to many people. Firstly, Americans and Canadians say Legos, so at this point this is standard usage. Let LMS explain how the language changes and things that used to be wrong can now be considered correct.
This is what I came up with after reading a huge thread on a grammar forum years ago. Let me tell you, people were very riled up about their opinion. Its true the Lego company chimed in and said Legos is wrong.
The posters on that thread kept trying to compare it to car brand names, but then someone else would poo poo that example. Here is the example: you are all familiar with TUPPERWARE, right? When you want to say you have tons of Tupperware bowls in your cabinet, you say " I have a lot of TUPPERWARE." Whether referring to one or many. We only say Tuppeware. If someone said Bring Me 5 Tupperwares, that would sound wrong. That's how using Legos sounds to Europeans. So Lego Bricks or Tupperware bowls. I say Legos, because I've always said that. I even marked a giant Rubbermaid bin on the basement with at least a million Legos as LEGOS. I was acutely aware when labeling it that I was embracing my American English. I recently noticed the use of Legos in a movie or TV show recently.
I just google Legos vs. Lego and it's never going to end. People want to poke their eyes out if you say Legos.
As she said, "ti" in timid is in black
Does anyone really say WHAT IN HELL (the answer for 50 Across)? It's What in THE hell, or What The Hell. It's never What in Hell. It may occasionally be What in Hell's name - I'll give you that - but it's never What In Hell. Don't believe me? Google it! lol
Yeah I remember in my newbie days I saw the same clue in another puzzle, racked my brains trying to think of 60s candidates for president and thought the answer must be LBJ or HHH for Humphrey. I learned and didn't make that mistake this time!
What the hell > What in the hell > What in hell
I was not on this puzzle's wavelength at all.
My 2 year old spend 30 min enjoying that fountain lol
There are trees in Bryant park all year long, not just winter.
@ JD (10:32)
Several of the atolls in the Marshall Islands share their name with the largest island on the atoll. So it is not uncommon to hear a Marshallese person say that they are from Wotje Wotje (Wotje Island on Wotje Atoll) or Jaluit Jaluit (Jaluit Island on Jaluit Atoll).
It sounds funny to American ears - until you point out New York, New York to them (though Marshallese omit the comma)
And unlike Google, they are never torn about this. ;)
@7:43
the bailiff states the oath as a question: "Do you ... yada" to which the witness says, simply, "I do".
@zed 9:23 I agree with that advice to just refuse to google if you want to improve and I wish I had seen that advice when I first started. The only advice I got was not to feel bad about using Google.
I started Feb. 2020 on doing these puzzles. I was using Google and I was making a list of words to learn. From that list, these are the ones I see a lot that I didn't know but I know now: ESAI (Morales) ODIN, ARARAT, EFTS, EDDA, ONEL, ERSE, ERATO, ASTA, OCHOA, ADEN, NORI, OBI, FRET (guitar), EWER, ROTI, OGEE, TREF, FALA, ETUI, AGRA, NENE, ACELA, MOA, SXSW, AGAR.
I know all those now, I still get confused about ISAO AOKI!
I decided to stop googling about 5 months into my solving hobby and was soon able to finish the Friday and Saturday, with no look ups, although it took me hours. I liked the good feeling and brain stretching I get from that. I do give myself a 3 hour limit before giving up. It's so much more satisfying than looking up answers. I put the puzzle down and come back. I am getting faster.
I have a letter from my grandmother to my parents in 1961. She was on the QE2 ship going to Italy. She wrote about how a young girl was wearing a bikini on the ship and she looked disgusting. She wrote that she wanted to say something to the teenager, but my grandfather told her to mind her own business. It was quite the scandal!
Re Googling crossword answers: As you know, I hate myself on those very rare occasions where I break down and do it, though I couldn't care less if other people do it. After all, it's your puzzle, your conscience, your ability to look at yourself in the mirror:)
But here's what I'm wondering: Would it be possible to create a puzzle in which not a single answer can be Googled? That would mean no names and probably no slam-dunk synonyms either.
If that could be accomplished, I'd consider it the equivalent of the perfect game* that Don Larson pitched in the World Series.
*A perfect game is one in which not a single batter reaches first base -- not on a hit, not on a walk, not even on an error.
boo for criticizing others without putting your name on your comment!
A psychiatrist, a podiatrist and a priest walk into a bar. The bartender looks up and says. "What is this, a joke?"
Again. If you are going to criticize, put your name on the post. Or post under the name "Troll", because that us what you are.
It's interesting that people are gnashing their teeth over WHAT IN HELL. (Isn't that a thing souls do in hell? Gnash teeth?) True, you hardly if ever hear it any more, but I'm pretty sure it was used plenty in the past. It definitely has an old-timey ring to it.
But if you think about it, it arguably makes more sense. Swap out "in" for another preposition, "to". We say "go to hell", not "go to the hell", much less "go the hell". (You *could* say "go to the hell" with the sense of "go to that particular hell", but it sounds a little funny because typically people with some sort of Judeo-Christian background think "hell is hell" and there's only the one.) Then, there's "get the hell out of here", which would be interesting to discuss, but I think "the hell" here is an intensifier and doesn't conjure up a place or state, similar to "get the fuck out of here".
Language!
I had a funny experience with "temerity" this morning. A good substitute by the way would be "gall". "He had the temerity to tell his mother-in-law how awful she looked". Anyway, I think I've always unconsciously linked the word "temerity" with "TIMID", that they have some sort of shared ancestry, even if it's hard to make sense of that. So much so that in my not fully awake mind this morning, I was for a moment sure that the NYT had made a grievous error, and was all set to say something about it. But then "duh" set in. And just to be sure, I looked it up and found the two words are not at all connected. Here then is the scoop on "temerity".
WIKIS by the way traces to Hawaiian wikiwiki, meaning fast.
Funny, I used to never GOOGLE doing crosswords. Now I do, at least once in a while, because I just don't want to spend a lot of time on crosswords any more -- too much else to do. Also, I used to do crosswords on paper with a felt-tipped pen, and you can bet your sweet bippy that I would make damned sure not to enter in a mistake. So Saturdays could take a very long time, or simply wouldn't get completed. In fact sometimes I would do about 3/4 of the puzzle in my head before entering a single answer, so obsessive was I about avoiding mistakes. Now it's online, and I try to go fast. So sad to see my moral decline!
JFK is another NYC area airport. As is EWR (Newark), so you have multiple options.
My personal themers:
-- Mon: HOPEITSORIGINAL
-- Tue: OFTENMALIGNED
-- Wed: COULDBEANYTHING
-- Thu: IWANTAREBUS
-- Fri: MYFAVEPUZZLEDAY
-- Sat: HARDCHALLENGE
-- Sun: CANBEQUITEASLOG
@Nancy…interesting concept on the -impossible to Google-puzzle! Somehow, I can’t fathom that “experienced” Googler couldn’t find SOMETHING that would give a clue BUT I think it could be possible if the puzzle had mostly word play in the nature of a Cryptic. I know when do a Cryptic I either do it or dnf. Well, I could use an anagram solver but I don’t. At any rate, like you and @ Zed, if I find I’m stuck I will usually walk away from the puzzle for awhile and I find that usually this works wonders! If I DO Google I consider it a personal dnf. To me, the only OTHER alternative is to do “reveal puzzle” on my app OR go to @Rex and look at his puzzle. This is why I take no real stock in the “stats” on my NYT app. I don’t care about “streaks” and I really don’t care about my time.
Also thanks for your post yesterday about resting on you-know-what…
@Whatsername, I’m glad you got a laugh on my Grand Canyon story. It has made good conversational fodder for my husband and I over the years. I totally own up to being a big brat on the trip and it was the first time that dark side of me had popped out!
@Tim Carey:
Right back attcha. We Mice are explicitly identifiable to anyone who can read:
@anon/6:99
Most of you 'named' posters are just anons (so far as I can tell, don't have real names or addresses attached to your Black/Blue names, ya know) with a made up handle. Trolling is trolling.
@Nancy - Since Google has access to approx. 100% of reasonably common human knowledge and has a half-way decent understanding of language, I would say no fair crossword could could have everything un-googleable. You would have to either find a hole in Google's knowledge space, or pose the question in such a way that it couldn't figure out what to look for. For the hole in Google's knowledge space, that would be just a series of questions on the order of "what was Pete's first dog's name". In trying to stump Google with figuring out what to look for, that would involve some way of conveying information that would be clear to a human, but unclear to the best of the AI's languages, something I doubt exists at this time. I would guess that the AI behind Google would be less facile with a cryptic crossword than with a standard American crossword, but would still be able to do it.
I believed they tried something along those lines at the ACPT several years ago to try to beat Dr. Fill. They did the first year, failed the second year. I forget who developed and programmed Dr. Fill, but as good as he was, he probably isn't as good as the combined talent of Google.
@Gio 12:01 PM. I store my Legos in Tupperware!
@Pete:
No human beat Watson on Jeopardy!, IIRC.
Current AI isn't intelligent, as we humans understand the word: intelligence amounts to intuiting beyond the holder's knowledgebase. No AI engines does that, merely queries and regurgitates from its knowledgebase; typically faster than humans, of course; see Watson. Some AI engines claim to implement a bit of stat correlation analysis, but that's still not Intelligence. Useful if you're trying to figure out what, as yet unpurchased, items a grocery store should push to a card holder. Can cause problems, though. Target, according to legend (so far as I can find), about 2012 is alleged to have sent out baby stuff coupons to a teenage female, which same were found by said female's father who wasn't otherwise aware. The coupons gag was, again allegedly, generated by correlation analysis of said female's purchase history. AI does the same thing. So far.
@whatsername
I hope you and future hubby had some halftime entertainment.
So why some non-numbered avenues?
Park Ave used to be 4th Ave. But Park was eventually deemed to be a deemed ritzier name.
And Lexington and Madison didn't exist when the grid was originally mapped out.
Villager
@Pete:
Here's a slightly different way of thinking about the challenge of building a non-Googlable puzzle. Web search engines are designed to find the most obvious pages that people might want to see, which leads to (a) a certain directness between queries and results and (b) the goal of acceptability to large numbers of people.
Suppose we turn Nancy's suggestion into a more concrete challenge: enter the clue verbatim but without quotes (let's add "-crossword" as well, to eliminate crossword-specific solutions) and see if the answer comes up in the first 20 hits.
I think what we'd see in a puzzle under this rule is clues that require a little leap of intuition, a switch of context, or an unexpected association to get an answer that could still make sense to the solver.
I'd thought that one of today's clues, "What did the ___ say when it was riding on the back of a turtle? Wheeeee!" would be a good example, but no! The first Google hit says that it's a familiar Dad joke, for children.
But along similar lines, maybe a clue like this? "Slow animal to go bowling with" (five letters). I'm not a constructor, so this is pretty terrible, I know, but I'm guessing that a solver might try to connect a slow animal with bowling, remember that bowling balls have three finger holes, and think, "Oh, a three-toed SLOTH." Google doesn't have a clue, of course.
Maybe I'm wrong. But I think the idea is sound.
Re: GOOGLing, when I started doing xwords in the early 70's, I purchased a xword dictionary and had no issue with checking it to complete the puz. From the 80's on, I changed course and would only look at outside resources after the solve. If I dnfed, so be it.
@TTrimble (2:00 PM)
Pretty much the same method you employed when I first started doing the NYT's xwords back in the 90's. I added one additional element to make them even more devilish: after carefully plotting a course (which could take upwards of an hour on late weekers), I would make my first entry, ensuring that I had at least one or two promising crosses. Then any fill from that point would require crossing existing fill. I would relish in taking hrs, days, even weeks to complete a puz. It took me years before I could get thru a Sat. unblemished.
____
Peace 🕊 🇺🇦 ~ Compassion ~ Tolerance ~ Kindness to all 🙏
Nancy,
No need for a long discourse on Google’s gaps.
Just look up duck hunting in Great Bay New Jersey, 3:00 AM.
Search result will be 0. Guaranteed. Sure as shootin.
Anon 3:05,
Hear, hear. Some people who post here a lot e.g., Nancy Stark ( who loves parading around her signed letters to the editor) and Marc Zigertman (Z is similarly loud regarding his frisbee pursuits) are in fact easily identified.
But they are of course in the minority. Tim Carey? I say your critic is using an alias. He’s certainly not in any way identifiable. But even if he were, that’s hardly an argument for allowing only those who fully identify themselves to comment. And that’s not my take. That’s Rex’s . After all, he could make fully disclosed identity a requisite for commenting.That he hasn’t tells you just how bankrupt Tom Carney’s or is Thad Carey”s or Tiberius Constantine’s position is.
My favorite etymology that is constantly rebracketed is for “helicopter.” It’s been bastardized into words like heli-pad and heli-vac, but it’s not heli / copter. It’s:
helico / pter.
Neat.
LEX will be called Barack Obama Avenue or Donald Trump Avenue or Google Avenue or Apple Avenue soon enough. Sigh.
To deservedly earn a Chen POW! on your debut puzzle is remarkable.
Congrats Ekua Ewool!
As a newbie, I have yet to find a puzzle that makes me say:
I'VE GOT THIS
I'll probably get there eventually...
This is the first time I read a Malaika piece. Nice to meet you! I also liked those curvy tendrils of blocks, especially because the word WAVED is right in the middle of the shapes
-Israel
Crossword Humor
What the hell is "REI" (30 Across)??
@Anon 5:10 - I'm glad I'm taking up that much space in your head, but you would be better served by using that time to increase your reading comprehension. Wake up time != start time. As I carefully explained, we got up, dressed, loaded the car, drove to our launching spot, launched the boat, loaded the boat, boated out to the bay, found a spot, dropped the decoys, camoflauged the boat, all prior to well before the 1/2 hour before dawn. Also 3:00AM was a stab in the dark memory from 50+ years ago. Might have been 4.
I remain concerned for your mental health.
@REI is a chain of stores selling outdoors gear - camping, hiking, climbing equipment - that kind of thing. Tents being one of those.
@Metrognome 6:44
REI is a very large national outdoors brand. They used to be a coop for mountain climbers in the Seattle area, but they are now truly all over the country. Very similar to LL Bean or EMS. And not unusual to see them appear in a NYTXW puz. But if you're not a hiker or a climber, I could see where this might be a little esoteric.
I love seeing people on this forum telling others the "proper" way to learn how to do puzzles. The more I think about it, the more it makes me laugh.
As I was reading/skimming the blog I was thinking "Wow, rex must be on some new medications because his tone is really much lighter than usual and it's actually quite refreshing." Then I went back and saw that we had a guest blogger today, which quickly explained everything. I thought today's puz was just fine.
@Lewis
ENOLA ALONE
And I almost made your exact mistake with SHIP PISH.
What in the name of Hell
What in Hell's name is this
What in Hell is this
are all good, but so is WHAT IN HELL...
The good ole dot dot dot which indicates an awe filled confusion where your mouth hangs agape and your confusion is total. Can't even finish the phrase.
EKE crossing KEKE just below ECO, WHAT IN HELL indeed.
My first post was suppose to read: Boldnesses? Temerities?
I was sure I typed it that way, but it did not auto-correct this time so I guess I didn't.
GOOGLE enough to enjoy the puzzle. Probably remember it better than if you look at the answer. Yes you might get better faster if you just keep at it, but it will be slower relative to the hours you spend on it. Time is pretty valuable too. Or you could just finish all those puzzles in heaven.
I just noticed GOOGLE is GO OGLE. Nongooglable clue?
Search for bare bosoms?
Why is the clue Alternative to J.F.K.? Doesn't that point to R.M.N. or H.H.H. (in the primaries) and not to L.G.A.?
@albatross -- Great catch with ENOLA!!!
@Albie
If you're flying in to or out of NYC you have 3 choices:
1. JFK - John F Kennedy International Airport
2. LGA - LaGuardia Airport
3. EWR - Newark International Airport
@Albatross Shell…that is why Malaika said the clue was “misdirect-y”. Anymore, I tend to think of JFK Airport so thought of LaGuardia (LGA)…I could NOT remember Newark was EWR. Other than THAT my only other alternative (that I know) would be the presidential race which would be RMN.
@albatross:
I'm a Vikki Dougan fan myself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikki_Dougan
"In 1961, her backless dresses and "callipygian cleft" were celebrated in the song "Vikki Dougan" by The Limeliters "
Let's take my favorite clue of the past year: "Free movie starring yourself."
You certainly wouldn't find the answer on Google.
Now suppose you could make every clue that clever and offbeat. Well, then you'd have an un-Google-able puzzle.
Of course, it would be nearly impossible to come up with something that clever and offbeat for every clue. And that's why I use the analogy of pitching a perfect game.
Oh, Hell! WTH are people complaining about? Hell if I know. Give 'em hell, anyway. I used to live near Hell, Michigan, and there's no "The" *there*. It seems like there's hella confusion, here.
JimG
Several commenters in the Lego/Legos kerfuffle above, site as conclusive the fact that the company itself insists that "Lego" is always an adjective, and that "Lego bricks" is the correct plural. I believe those commenters misunderstand why the company insists on those words. It's not for any common usage reason. It's not because they believe everyone will stop using "Lego" as a noun or "Legos" as the plural.
They do it for legal reasons only. In almost all cases, in order to protect a trademark, it must be used as an adjective and not a noun. If you Google "trademark adjective noun" you'll see many articles on the topic. A clear example is Band-Aid brand. While people often refer to Band-Aids, J&J will always insist that they are "Band-Aid Brand Adhesive Bandages." Look on any box of Band-Aids and below the word "Band-Aid" you will ALWAYS see the words "Adhesive Brand Bandages." Far from being dipositive, a company's insistence that its product's name is not a noun happens precisely because the public uses it as a noun. The insistence that it's not a noun arises from the company's fear of losing its trademark and nothing else.
So unless you're ready to start calling them "Band-Aid Brand Adhesive Bandages" you can't expect other folks not to say "Legos."
Such a fuss over nothing! Okay then, they're Legopodes. Move on.
Nice theme idea; I agree that the weekend is unaccounted for, but also that a five-themer 15x15 can breathe. Another open grid to work in.
Almost committed to WHAT Is fiLL for the Thursday one. I like hers better. This would've been a solid birdie but for the EKE sighting. Par it is.
Wordle par that should've been a second eagle in a row. Rats!
Had Kmart before KOHLS. And yes, there is a bit of iffy fill and cluing like for 1D which should not be plural but (that’s on the editor), but overall it was a very enjoyable solve. So HATs off to a GEM of a debut puzzle by Ekua Ewool.
PS - Got the Wordle in four today. Warning: It is quite EVIL.
BAR NONE
I’DLIKE to DOTHEDEW, yet
IMIGHT choose GIN for ME,
and WINE’S WHAT keeps my tongue WET,
now I’VEGOTTHIS urge to PEA.
--- ANNA ADAMS
@Anonymous 7:58am :
I took the clue to mean that originally they were only to be found in Denmark.
@Anonymous 8:35am :
Well, if you're going to get nitty, then Hawaii isn't made up of islands, but consists of volcanoes, some active, some dormant.
Oh my. Lego my ECO Eggo.
Seemed like a Mondayish Wednesday, which, from me, is a compliment.
Diana, Lady-in-Waiting for Crosswords
LEGO of it some of you.
Wordle par, but a struggle.
Post a Comment