Thoroughfare through N.Y.C.'s Chinatown / SUN 6-7-26 / Soda brand named for a volcano / Syntax-reversing rhetorical device / Union victory site of 1862 / Type of Thai red curry / Resident of the so-called "Nation of Poets" / North African fortress, in one spelling / Early Google algorithm for determining the importance of websites / Eighth Avenue express line in N.Y.C. / Like about 88% of U.A.E.residents / Red-haired hunter in Genesis / Country whose flag is known as "An Tridhathach" ("The Tricolor"): Abbr.
Sunday, June 7, 2026
Constructor: Adam Wagner and Simeon Seigel
Relative difficulty: Medium
Theme answers:
- GA TECH / ANGELIC / ENSURE (out of these three (unclued) "answers," you "make" the following two: GATE CHANGE and LICENSURE) (22A: With 23- and 24-Across, airport announcement / Requirement to practice, perhaps)
- SOLI / STENCHES / STABLES ("SO LISTEN..." and CHESS TABLES) (30A: With 32- and 35-Across, "Now, here's the thing..." / Some board game surfaces)
- MADRE / SPECTATED / INNER (MAD RESPECT and ATE DINNER) (48A: With 50- and 54-Across, serious props / Had an evening meal)
- CHIAS / MUSCLEMEN / TINES (CHIASMUS and CLEMENTINES) (87A: With 88- and 91-Across, syntax-reversing rhetorical device / Small peelable citrus fruits)
- THE REST / "I MEANT IT" / HEFT ("THERE'S TIME" and ANTITHEFT) (105A: With 106- and 108-Across, "No need to hurry" / Like some security measures)
- WASABI / TODDLES / SOFTEN (WAS A BIT ODD (!?!?!?) and LESS OFTEN) (115A: With 118- and 121-Across, didn't quite fit in, say / Not as frequently)
In rhetoric, chiasmus (/kaɪˈæzməs/ ky-AZ-məs) or, less commonly,[citation needed] chiasm (Latin term from Greek χίασμα chiásma, "crossing", from the Greek χιάζω, chiázō, "to shape like the letter Χ"), is a "reversal of grammatical structures in successive phrases or clauses – but no repetition of words".
A similar device, antimetabole, also involves a reversal of grammatical structures in successive phrases or clauses in an A-B-B-A configuration, but unlike chiasmus, presents a repetition of words. // Chiasmus balances words or phrases with similar, though not identical, meanings:
— Shakespeare, Othello 3.3
"Dotes" and "strongly loves" share the same meaning and bracket, as do "doubts" and "suspects".
Additional examples of chiasmus:
— Samuel Johnson, The Vanity of Human Wishes (1749)
— Mary Leapor, "Essay on Woman" (1751)
For comparison, the following is considered antimetabole, in which the reversal in structure involves the same words:
— Lord Byron, Don Juan (1824) (wikipedia)
Between parsing and unparsing and reparsing the answers and the unclued "answers" and then dealing with shorter fill that was not-at-all self-evident to me (HIST? EXPAT?), this one did not go particularly quickly for me. Sloggy. Not fun-tough. Fussy-tough. I think the PAGE RANK / TEASER RATE part was the slowest for me, mostly because neither of those terms is that familiar to me (I had SITE RANK or something like that, and then ... I don't know what kind of RATE I was considering, but it definitely wasn't TEASER. Maybe INTRO or something like that). I had to wait on the Dwarf because SLEEPY and SNEEZY have so many letters in common (102D: One of the Seven Dwarfs). I had no idea what was going on with ANY SIZE for obvious reasons, i.e. that is a terrible non-thing that should not be allowed to pass as a standalone answer (124A: What wristwatch straps are designed to accommodate). Though I enjoyed hardly anything in this puzzle, I weirdly enjoyed MOTT ST (95D: Thoroughfare through N.Y.C.'s Chinatown), largely because it's got this improbable phalanx of consonants at the end (TTST), and because it makes me think of the Rodgers & Hart song "Manhattan," specifically this lovely rendition by Blossom Dearie.
- 28A: America's largest labor union, familiarly (THE NEA) — Pronouncing this as one word now (THEE'-nee-ya) so that I can pretend that stupid definite article isn't there.
- 26A: North African fortress, in one spelling (KASBAH) — lol is there another spelling? I saw "in one spelling" and thought "dear lord how the hell are they going to spell it today? QAZZBA?" But no, just KASBAH, the only way I even remember seeing it spelled. Although now that I'm looking at CASBAH, maybe *that's* the spelling I'm most familiar with. I already had the "K" in place when I looked at the clue, so maybe I'm just hallucinating KASBAH as the most familiar spelling. Anyway, there are at least three more spellings, in addition to the "K" and "C" spellings: QASBAH, QASBA, QASABA
- 41A: Former alliance of France, Italy, Japan, the U.S., the U.K. and West Germany (G-SIX) — there are so many "G" alliances that I'm not sure how anyone could keep them straight. I guess this clue gives you the opportunity to count, so, yes ... there are six countries you've got there. But you don't really need to count once you have the "G"—no other number is going to work but SIX. I mean, G-ONE would be pretty lonely, and G-TWO ... could be as bad as one, it's the loneliest G-group since the group G-ONE. Oh crud, I forgot about the G-TEN, that would've fit too. Never mind.
- 75A: Manufacturer's gross product? (SMOG) — that's a pretty clever clue for SMOG. But then SMOG crosses OPE 🙁 and all pleasure from the SMOG clue goes poof, just like that.
- 85A: Feature of an intersection that forces a turn (T-SHAPE) — had the "T" and thought "oh, what are those called ... T-STOPS? Three-way stops?" I would never in a million years have thought the answer would be something as dumb as T-SHAPE. It's just a "T." I guess you can't argue with the fact that a "T" is T-SHAPEd, but yeesh, that answer, not pretty. And crossing OPE! Rough patch there.
- 94A: Resident of the so-called "Nation of Poets" (SOMALI) — I have never heard Somalia so-called that. This was basically "Random resident of a country, good luck."
- 69D: Underworld boss? (HADES) — if you wrote in SATAN here, I understand, you are forgiven.
- 6D: Type of Thai red curry (PANANG) — good answer. Delicious answer. CURRY killed me on Quordle the other day because I had CUR-Y and had eliminated what I thought were all plausible letters that could go in that slot. And so I wrote in CURVY. D'oh! Forgot about the letters I already had in the word (namely, "R")! Rrrrrookie mistake.
- 36A: Musician who said "Reality leaves a lot to the imagination" (LENNON) — I wonder if "imagination" is supposed to be a subtle hint, since LENNON famously sang "Imagine." I think "Imagine" is kind of an insipid song, so here's something else.
[Follow Rex Parker on BlueSky and Facebook and Letterboxd]
=============================
❤️ Support this blog ❤️:
✏️ Upcoming Crossword Tournaments ✏️
- Westwords (Berkeley, CA, Jun. 14, 2026)
📘 My other blog 📘:
- Pop Sensation (vintage paperbacks)


















31 comments:
Never heard of CHIASMUS, had to look it up, and yesterday had my lifetime fill of the word. I found this this puzzle arduous and unpleasant, too.
“Split Second” comes from having to split the second word in the trio.
Easy-Medium. Medium until I got the gimmick, then easy. Basically what @Rex said.
* * _ _ _
Overwrites:
At 15D I thought the Wildcats might be Washington State (wSU). Nope. They're the Cougars. Kansas State (KSU) are Wildcats.
Didn't watch Schitt's Creek. Thought the eldest Levy might be ElaiNE instead of EUGENE (37D).
Before reading the clue, ACCEde before ACCEPT for the confirmation at 70D.
lgS before GES for the 78D microwaves.
My 79A worries were fretS before they were CARES.
PAGE link before RANK for the search algorithm at 96A.
Misread the 11D clue as "Learning type," so I had rote before ITAL.
I thought the epa might ban dyes at 122D, but no. It was the FDC.
WOEs:
Green Day's TRE cool at 17d.
CHIASMUS (part of the theme at 87A)
Medium-challenging for me, probably took me about 45 minutes altogether. But I loved the combination of the title, the themers, and the revealers. And some of the words (either the mashed up clued ones, or the unclued ones) were just really fun. I felt like the primo themers were at the end of the puzzle. GATECH is a bit rough... but MUSCLEMEN is lotsa fun. IMEANTIT and HEFT becoming ANTITHEFT. WASABI, TODDLES, and SOFTEN becomes WAS A BIT ODD and LESSOFTEN. Awesome! I had ARTMEET before ART TEST and so my TEASERRATE was a MEASERRATE for a long time and, while I knew that was wrong, I just couldn't quite figure out how to fix it.... finally saw my problem. Anyhoo, liked it a bunch more than OFL, at least ***.5 from me. And still no star wars, right???? and no GOT either. Nice work, Adam and Simeon, and thank you!!!! : )
I got started up in the north, was having as much fun as a recent root canal, read Rex to confirm my suspicions, and threw in the towel. Convoluted themes are not for me, and this one took it to a new level.
A bit of a bizarre run with the NYT lately. I wish I could say it’s been hit and miss, but it’s really been more miss than hit though. It’s too bad, as it seems as though we had some momentum going over the past couple of weeks. Hopefully this is a bit of an anomaly, sort of like a ball player working their way through a batting slump.
Rex is correct in that "you can't argue with the fact that a "T" is T-SHAPEd," but you can argue that it "that forces a turn." If you approach the intersection from the top of the T you may proceed straight ahead.
Oh, well, I love these two constructors, who excel at entertaining with humor, artistry, skill, and often deviousness.
So, I was not surprised at my marvelous “Hah!” when I saw the theme’s gimmick; nor was I surprised at the fun type of thinking needed to crack the remaining theme answers.
But the pièce de résistance came upon reading the constructors’ notes. Adam and Simeon were not daunted when the computer spit out 40,000 theme answer possibilities. Many, I’m guessing, would have tossed the idea entirely at that juncture, or just randomly picked answers that worked.
But no, they narrowed the list to the cream, then narrowed it further to the cream of the cream.
That’s a ton of work in the pursuit of excellence. And a ton more devoted to high-quality cluing and grid design.
Again, I’m not surprised by it, knowing your work, Adam and Simeon. Thank you for what you do for Crosslandia, and for a most splendid outing today!
Today was the first time I noticed that CASABLANCA and CADDYSHACK have the exact same number of letters...
I liked this puzzle better than Rex and others, and thought the theme was OK. It must've been very challenging to come up with 3 words/phrases that could be "split" as they did. I had no issue with TEASERRATE, but only my brother (who is a tech-kind-of-guy) knew PAGERANK, which I had never even heard of. Agree on the less-than-desirable ARTTEST, TSHAPE (I know T junctions...).
Oops! - Just realized I Naticked on ANYSIZE (I had ARMSIZE, and wondered what are INORE and DME??).
I was initially reluctant to write in PANANG, since I thought this was in Malaysia (not Thailand). Penang is in Malaysia, yes... And the etymology of the name for the Thai curry may in fact be from Malay: "The word phanaeng (พะแนง) is believed from the Thai adaptation of the Malay word panggang, meaning “grilled.” " (Wikipedia)
I teach Latin (and sometimes Greek), so I appreciated what you shared about chiasmus and antimetabole. I have never heard chiasm or read anyone use that, or antimetabole , but maybe I just don't read enough. Be that as it may, I thought it was RIDICULOUS for chiasmus to appear in the NY Times Crossword. My students know what chiasmus is, and It's a lot easier to spot in Latin and is useful to know about as an aid in translating. To my mind, 'Fair is foul and foul is fair' is a much easier Shakespearean example to remember. As soon as I mentioned the quote from Macbeth, one of my students immediately thought of a chiasmus in Taylor Swift.
Crossing an unfamiliar term like RAGAS with the unclued GATECH was a choice. I put the tech school in Louisiana rather than Georgia, and would argue that lATECHANGE is at least defensible as an airport announcement, and RAlAS looked as right as RAGAS to me. Not exactly Natick, but pretty close.
I liked the theme better than Rex, but mostly because of the AHA moment when I figured it out after being lost at sea for most of the solve.
Did not like this as much as Rex did. It's rare, but occasionally a single word in a puzzle can ruin it, but today's as multiple candidates: LICENSURE, WAS A BIT ODD, ANY SIZE, ATE DINNER.
Normally, even if I did not like a puzzle, reading @Lewis's comments will give me an appreciation for qualities I may have missed. Today, reading Lewis made me dislike the puzzle even more. You had 40,000 possibilities and this is the best you could come up with? I can't imagine what some of the rejects were like.
Rex was too kind - STENCHES is apt fill for this highly unenjoyable Sunday morning solve.
TEASER and the Firecat
Know longer worried, noing your router is OK.
The theme here is perfectly clear: You see 2 longer answers across 3 shorter ones. OK, perhaps "3 out of 2" might be slightly more accurate. As in "You, the solver, must make 3 short answers out of 2 clues I'll give you for longer answers"?
Enjoyed it. 3.5 stars, so there.
First time in forever I checked on Rex after about 10 minutes. No fun at all, just a slog.
Definitely got a chuckle. "Said to be", as some say.
It’s a bad sign when after about ten minutes I’m annoyed & just want to look things up. All that plodding & head-scratching for a painfully dull conceit.
This may have inspired me to finally cancel my subscription. The puzzles get worse and worse almost each and every day. Why do I pay for this BS? Not no more.
Ingenious construction does not equal fun to solve. Couldn’t wait to be done with this baby.
Wow. Worst / least enjoyable Sunday puzzle in a long, long time.
Sorry for this question if it is naive. Newbie crossword puzzle solver here.
Do all crossword creators use AI and computer programs to come up with themes/answers? Was this always the case? Again not knowing anything about how a puzzle is created, this seems kind of weak to me and I had assumed the creators thought up their puzzles by themselves. I know that yesterday’s puzzle used AI to figure out a grid shape and that seems more palatable to me but using AI to come up with actual answers seems wrong. But I’m sure I’m wrong on this! So please educate me!
Hey All !
Time running up on the solve, stuck in sections with no hope of getting answers, so cheating commenced! Came here to look at Rex's grid for the PHOEBE/PANANG/HIGHCS unknown trifecta. Also a few spots in SE/SCenter. Oh well
Interesting idea, kind of odd in execution. Liked that all the have-to-combine-thingies are real words.
Not my cuppa this morning. Sorry gents, I'm sure this was fun to make.
Hope y'all have a great Sunday!
Five F's
RooMonster
DarrinV
Slogged all the way through this one, and not sure why I bothered. I knew CHIASMUS but took forever to parse [ball pit]. Not knowing many college sports teams kept KSU hidden (so many possible state universities). That made SOCKET the finish line for me, and even then, I had to sit with it for a minute before it dawned on me: Hip joint. Shoulder joint. Trailer hitch. So many ball-and-socket combos.
For a moment I thought the musician being quoted was Annie LENNOx.
This took me about twice as long as a normal Sunday. I could keep it short and refer you to Rex, what he said, everything he said. Anyway, it took me quite a while to get into, i.e., to see what was going on, and although it eased up a fair amount once I got past that point, it felt tortured and awkward nonetheless. And it felt like a slog, landing at the starting point of one horizontal entry after another, only to hear a voice say, "if I told you once, I told you a thousand times: you need to go back to the clue which you will find for the entry which starts the triplet of the line you are currently in -- understand?"
To try to be charitable: the theme idea looks like a promising one, but it's probably also pretty ambitious. I've seen Adam Wagner's name before and I think also Simeon Seigel's name, so these are not rookie constructors. So my guess is that s-t-r-e-t-c-h-i-n-g it out to span all the way across, SIX times, is harder to pull off well than you might think. The bed of Procrustes metaphor leaps to mind. But it still seems like an idea worth trying.
My inner snark is humming, "I don't want you, I don't need you, and there ain't no way I'm ever gonna love you." It feels a little mean, but now that you put that Meat Loaf ear worm in my head (TWO OUT OF THREE ain't bad), something else inside took over and I disclaim any further responsibility.
Let me find something else to do now.
MOTTST in July is associated with STENCHES in my book and a reason to get out of Manhattan for the summer.
I'm glad at least one person shares my take on IMAGINE. It is an anthem popular for reasons other than its merit as a piece of music.
I got stuck solving it while falling asleep, then my brain worked in the morning. Didn't mind the puzzle, admired the themers, which reminded me of long versions of what @egs does here regularly. Computer generation takes a little bloom off the rose...
I came here to say the exact same thing
"one of my students immediately thought of a chiasmus in Taylor Swift" <-- well, what is it? Inquiring minds would like to know.
💯
I hadn't read Lewis's comment before I read yours. So that must be it: the powerful siren song of AI seduces again.
It's not a good direction we're headed in. It's really not.
@Anonymous 8:03
Most constructors--with very few exceptions, I'd wager (I think Anna Shechtman still does a lot of unassisted constructing)--use computers and likely AI for construction. Before these innovations, it was (obviously) done without this sort of assistance, but dictionaries and other references were used instead. If constructors aren't using AI, they are certainly using computers, databases, and the like the craft their puzzles.
That's Shakespeare? I always thought Earl Weaver said it, complaining about an ump.
Post a Comment