Restaurant chain with an avian mascot / SUN 7-28-24 / Negative Nancy words? / Letters after Lucasfilm / Cattle-driving dispute / Phenomenon allegorized in "The Crucible" / Raccoonlike mammal of China / Substance in a bagel-making "bath" / Rizal national hero of the Philippines / Teletubby with a repetitive name / Musical composition like the Gauri in Sikh tradition / Chain that offers obedience training classes / Spice Girl Chisholm, casually / Part of a woman's anatomy named for Dr. Ernst Gräfenberg
Constructor: Paolo Pasco
Relative difficulty: Easy (Ultra-Easy, maybe the easiest Sunday of all time)
THEME: "The Big Five-O"—a puzzle depicting the OLYMPIC FLAG (114A: This puzzle's subject) — Five olympic rings are represented by colored squares; every answer that forms a part of a ring has, as its first word/first part, the color of that ring:
BLUE:
-PRINT (36A: Detailed plan of action)
STATE (45D: Democratic stronghold)
"BAYOU" (79A: Signature hit for Linda Ronstadt)
-BIRDS (43D: Thy fly somewhere over the rainbow)
BLACK:
MAGIC (38A: Malevolent sorcery)
-MAILS (47D: Extorts from, in a way)
OLIVE (81A: Supreme pizza topping)
SHEEP (46D: Ostracized family member)
RED:
ROBIN (40A: Restaurant chain with an avian mascot)
SCARE (50D: Phenomenon allegorized in "The Crucible")
ALERT (82A: "Danger! Danger!")
PANDA (48D: Raccoonlike mammal of China)
YELLOW:
PAGES (59A: Obsolescent book)
BELLY (65D: Milquetoast)
CARDS (98A: Results of some fouls in soccer)
-STONE (63D: National park since 1872)
GREEN:
GIANT (60A: Brand in the frozen food section)
SALSA (69D: Dip made from tomatillos)
-HOUSE (100A: What has a lot of room to grow?)
RIVER (67D: Creedence Clearwater Revival song named after a place "where cool water flows")
Bonus themers:
RING BEARER (17A: Wedding role ... or a description of 114-Across?)
COLOR WHEEL (20A: Artist's diagram ... or one of five for 114-Across?)
Word of the Day: JOSÉ Rizal (28A: ___ Rizal, national hero of the Philippines) —
He was executed by the Spanish colonial government for the crime of rebellion after the Philippine Revolution broke out; it was inspired by his writings. Though he was not actively involved in its planning or conduct, he ultimately approved of its goals which eventually resulted in Philippine independence.
Rizal is widely considered one of the greatest heroes of the Philippines and has been recommended to be so honored by an officially empaneled National Heroes Committee. However, no law, executive order or proclamation has been enacted or issued officially proclaiming any Filipino historical figure as a national hero. He wrote the novels Noli Me Tángere (1887) and El filibusterismo (1891), which together are taken as a national epic, in addition to numerous poems and essays. (wikipedia)
• • •
This is a clever and seemingly intricate construction—what with so much theme content, and so much of it interlocking, plus the revealer and the two bonus theme answers—but as a solving experience, it was pretty ... hollow, I guess. I mean, it was slight. It was like a mini, blown up to maxi proportions. Lots of five-letter answers, all of them extremely easy to suss out. Once you grok the concept—and it ain't hard—then chances are you can immediately get all or most of the way to here (as I did):
I got [BLACK]MAGIC, thought "Oh, is that it?," kept solving like normal for a bit, then thought, "What the hell..." and tried to get every answer in every ring. And succeeded. I had to think for a second about [GREEN]HOUSE (100A: What has a lot of room to grow?), but otherwise, everything went right in. When you just hand readers the first part of That many answers, a lot of the fun and All of the challenge goes right out the door. This is a bright, shiny thing, a good-looking thing, a cute thing, but it's not much of a puzzle. I mean, its purpose seems to be primarily decorative. There's nothing really to figure out. Filling in the answers almost feels beside the point. Superfluous. Even the revealer feels pretty redundant. It's obviously the OLYMPIC FLAG. I can see that. You're describing the obvious. So while this is well made, it feels like it's made for a child's placemat. A precocious child, I guess. But still. There's no heft to this. I neither enjoyed nor unenjoyed it. I hardly had the time to work up any feeling at all.
So, yeah, the Olympic Games started this week in Paris, so the puzzle is at least timely. I'm really struggling to find anything to say about it. The bonus themers are pretty clever, as puns go? Uh ... I like the BRA clue? (1A: Word following "push-up" that anagrams to a word following "pull-up") (it's "pull-up bar," which I assume you've figured out by now) (they can't say "bar" because BAR is an answer elsewhere in the puzzle) (65A: Cheers, for one). I was just thinking today how great Cheers was. Actually, I was remembering what a huge crush I had on Diane as a kid. Actually actually, what I was thinking about was the 1982 movie Night Shift, and how much Bruce Willis, in the first season of Moonlighting (which I've started rewatching) often appears to be channeling the voice and mannerisms and occasionally exact expressions of Michael Keaton's character (Bill) in Night Shift (a 1982 movie about two guys—Keaton and Henry Winkler who decide to run a prostitution ring out of a morgue). And then I thought of Shelley Long because she's also in Night Shift (as the quintessential "hooker with a heart of gold"). And then I thought of Cheers. And then I did this puzzle. And here we are. If Star Wars was the most formative moviegoing experience of my childhood, Night Shift was the most formative movie-watching experience of my adolescence—can't say "moviegoing" because I only ever saw it on "laser disc," which were those giant, LP-sized discs that were precursors to DVDs. My dad was always an early adopter of gadgetry. I mean, we had a damned Betamax player. We eventually got a VHS player, like normal people, but mostly, in the early/mid-80s, we watched movies on laser disc, and we watched Night Shift over and over and over and over. I'm sure (quite sure) the movie is dated and politically ... uh, questionable on many, many levels. But Michael Keaton in that movie was ... just ... iconic for me. Bill Murray and Steve Martin were the obvious comedy heroes of boys my age, but for me, in terms of movie performances, it was Keaton in Night Shift. The gold standard. "Call Starkist." If you know, you know. Anyway, as I was saying: BAR ... is an answer in this puzzle.
Probably the most interesting answer in this puzzle is RANGE WAR (37D: Cattle-driving dispute). I like it because it's original and because it makes me think of old westerns, which I both love and love to hate (racism against Native Americans is *pretty* standard, as is rather cruel treatment of the stunt horses, but I love me some handsome dudes strutting around trying to outdude each other, especially if Angie Dickinson or Grace Kelly or Barbara Stanwyck or Joan Collins is nearby). I also like PAN-ARAB, TAKE THE BAIT, and "I'M HUNGRY!" (41D: What "Meow!" might mean) ("Kitties! I just fed you! You want more? OK. What? What is it, Ida? You want me to physically carry you to your food bowl? Hmm. Alright. Seems fair. Whatever you need"). Like I say, the puzzle is not poorly made. Not at all. It just didn't have any fight in it. I didn't know JOSÉ Rizal, but otherwise, there wasn't a single answer that gave me any real trouble. EAR CANAL, maybe a little, but that's it (83D: Channel that gets audio only?).
Not sure about that "only" in the EAR CANAL clue. I guess in the sense of "not video," then yes, audio only. But it can also get, I dunno, pain, in circumstances. And wax. Definitely gets wax ("cerumen," it's called, I just learned) (don't click on that link if you don't want to see earwax, yikes, definite trigger warning there). Speaking of canals, on tonight's episode of The Love Boat (the back end of a two-parter from early in season 4), the Pacific Princess sailed through the Panama Canal. So many locks! So exciting! Donny Most! Erin Moran! Charlene Tilton! Peter Graves! Debbie bleeping Reynolds! So much fun. Well, except when Gopher got left behind in a Panamanian prison because police mistook him for an illegal drug dealer because Doc sent him ashore on a (legal) drug-buying errand in order to get Gopher out of the way so that Doc could have more time alone with the two comically, exaggeratedly, performatively flirty ladies (Dawn Wells! Ann Jillian!) who were the judges in some kind of wedding contest (it was a group wedding cruise, don't ask). But more on that another time. Don't worry. Gopher's fine.
Explainers:
9A: Israeli desert (NEGEV) — this sometimes appears as NEGEB. Never commit to that last letter without a crosscheck, even though it's far more likely to be NEGEV (32 appearances in the Shortz/Fagliano Era, versus only one for NEGEB (back in 2008))
28A: ___ Rizal, national hero of the Philippines (JOSÉ) — OK, back to this guy. Whenever I see a name like RIZAL (i.e. short, belonging to an allegedly famous person, completely unfamiliar to me), I think "Why haven't I seen this name in crosswords before?" Well, if you solve only the NYT crossword, then the last time you saw RIZAL would've been [drumroll] 1953! I was gonna say "that's a longggggg time between appearances," but of course RIZAL didn't appear today. JOSÉ did. I wonder if we'll ever see RIZAL again. If you remember solving the puzzle with the one and only appearance of RIZAL, you have an amazing memory, especially for someone who is at least 90 years old, congrats.
22A: Multipiece furniture purchases (OTTOMAN SETS) — this answer felt normal to me but my wife insisted it was weird so I ended up looking up OTTOMAN SETS last night on my phone just before bedtime and ... I guess you buy matching ottomans ... as a set? But also there are chair and ottoman sets, so when you search "OTTOMAN SETS" you get a jumble of things. I did not know ottomans came in sets, though I guess if you have a space where multiple ottomans are called for and you like things matchy-matchy, it makes sense.
68A: Letters after Lucasfilm (LTD) — what an odd and hyperspecific way to come at LTD. I was not at all sure. And there's a bit of a tricky clue on one of the crosses: [It's not long.] for LAT. (i.e. "latitude," which is not long- ... itude).
73A: Round up at the start? (PRELIMS) — an excellent trick clue. "Round up" looks like a verb but no, "Round" is a noun, as in a round of a tournament. PRELIMS come early ("up at the start") of some tournaments.
81A: Supreme pizza topping (OLIVE) — hey, the allegedly "divisive" pizza topping (see Friday's puzz) is back! Non-divisively. Could also have clued ONION this way too, but the puzzle went with [Fried rice add-on] instead.
93A: Concerning egg cells (OVULAR) — no problem with this answer, though I do have a slight problem with duping "cells" in the clue (which already appears in the grid in FUEL CELLS (85A: Power sources for some electric cars))
106D: Negative Nancy words? (NONS) — Nancy is a city in France. "Noes" (the plural of "no") are "negative words." So "Negative words" in "Nancy" are NONS (the plural of the French word for "no"—"non"). Pretty creative clue for a pretty ugly answer.
75D: Spice Girl Chisholm, casually (MEL) — if you're going to be that specific, including the last name and all, the answer really should be MEL C. That is how she typically appears in the grid (seven NYTXW appearances), to distinguish her from her colleague, MEL B (two NYTXW appearances). Not sure why you wade into Spice World when the answer is just MEL. Lotsa plain-old MELs in the world.
57D: ___ Oyu, sixth-highest peak in the world (CHO) — should've made this the word of the day. Never heard of it. It's in the Himalayas, on the Nepal/Tibet border. CHO Oyu means "Turquoise Goddess" in Tibetan.
99D: "The ___ true for ..." (SAME'S) — I just have "oof" written next to this one. This is a thematically load-bearing answer, and there aren't a lot of good options. Still, oof.
95D: Part of a woman's anatomy named for Dr. Ernst Gräfenberg (G-SPOT) — trying to imagine some guy getting the "G" and going "Wait ... anatomy? Women's anatomy? ... I don't ... GRÄFE? ... is it GRÄFE? Do women have GRÄFEs? How did I not know this? GRÄFE?? What does it do? Honey!... Come here a minute. I have questions ..."
Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld
P.S. back to Love Boat for a sec—I just looked up Peter Graves and I am now the same age he was in Airplane! Howwwwwww? When it came out, I was the same age as this kid!:
If you solved in the app, as I did, the proliferation of colored squares made the experience truly horrible. I had no idea where I was, and there was no ability to get a holistic sense of progress in the middle.
Brutally hard to see, especially when done on the sofa at night, had no idea where I was. Yeah got the theme and pretty easy to fill in the whole center
I came to say this. I don’t m is what it looks like in print but on my phone I couldn’t tell where I was and so a lot of the words I’d filled in didn’t seem to go with the clue I thought I was on. Fun concept and an easy puzzle but filling it out was awful.
You're absolutely right it was horrible in the app. So many times I've had to go to the list of clues then go back to the grid and figure out where I was. Wasted a lot of time just trying to navigate. I found it.so annoying.
Yeah. I went to the options and turned the overlay off. Was annoying otherwise. Unfortunately, it was then a long time before I realized the color mattered.
Yes. At least half the solve time today was just spent trying to figure out where I was typing. The theme was easy to get early. The rest of the experience was no fun at all. Powered through to keep the steak going, but otherwise I would have been happy to skip this one.
For solving in the NYT app: Hit the settings button, scroll down to 'Other', then de-select "Show Overlays". This will make the colors appear as grey squares. And I agree, the colors made the puzzle garishly frustrating!
I had a worse experience. I printed the puzzle on a black/white printer and had to go look at the screen version to see the colors. Yellow and green were essentially white so solving BELLY and HOUSE were almost impossible, and I got them entirely from the crosses.
Leave it to Paolo to come up with something so creative for such a boring theme. I think the only time the Summer Olympics ever interested me was the year Dave Wottle ran. I like hockey and skiing and bobsled etc - always seemed to be too much drama in the summer.
Definitely easy as the big guy highlights - I finished in one long across + down pass. The color gimmick made it feel like a Highlights puzzle - not much thought involved. I did like the OCEAN - TERNS stack especially since I’m on my way to the beach for an early morning ride.
Apparently none of the whiz-bang designers of the digital version on the app actually ever tried to solve this on the NYTimes app. The colored-in squares make it impossible to follow the highlights indicating whether your direction is down or up. Amazingly frustrating. Hey NYTimes: Just because you CAN do something, doesn't mean you should (an admonition apparently utterly unknown to this generation of techies).
Exceptionally easy, but I’ll take it on a Sunday. After I finished filling in the rings, I was delighted to realize how close I was to the bottom. On most Sundays, that’s normally the point where I think “Will this ever end?”
Cute and breezy. Agree with so many 3-, 4-, and 5-letter answers, this went quickly despite a fair bit of PPP. I only got held up briefly by initially going with HEAVY instead of HEFTY at 100D.
I think the "audio only" concept in 83D means there's no video; perhaps Rex is overthinking things to state that cerumen, etc., can end up in the EARCANAL.
I cringed a little when we had to think back to the Teletubbies, trying to sing the theme song to come up with LAALAA. Our kids watched them over and over and over [ad nauseam]... Mesmerizing to the young brain.
Entertaining write-up! Puzzle, not so much. After Blue Bayou, I was able to fill in all the other theme answers pronto. Liked the clues better than you did, but Anita Baker is best described as a jazz singer, not a soul singer. Just like cluing Etta James as a jazz singer rather than a soul singer, which seems to have become the norm. Some crossover, sure, but still incorrect for both, in my view.
Pretty much agree with all of this. Interesting premise, and impressive construction, but it made for a REALLY quick solve. But given the weight of the theme, it was impressively clean, with not a lot of ugliness.
I also agree that solving in the app was horrendous given the colors. I kept losing track of where my "cursor" was.
And thanks, Rex - I now looked up Peter Graves and discovered that I'm OLDER than he was when he made Airplane. Now I need to go take a nap...
As a color-blind solver working the puzzle online this was an awful solving experience. As others have said it was very difficult for me to see which cell I had highlighted, but I would add that it was also really difficult to see what I had previously typed in some of the cells due to contrast. Cool concept Paolo but please don't ever do it again Joel.
Definitely a formatting gimmick taken too far - you can add my voice the growing chorus of solvers who felt that the color scheme actively hindered solving. Having sussed out the obvious function of the colored rings my brain wanted to pair the black ring clues with GRAY instead of BLACK ("what on earth is a GRAY SHEEP, is that a thing too?"), since that was the color they had to go with for practical reasons. The puzzle would have been more enjoyable if there had been no coloring at all and was only revealed (online at least) upon completion, perhaps using one of those "tada!" animations (grating, but at least not so in the way) NYT website is so fond of recently.
When I saw Paolo’s name atop the grid (I love his clever puzzles), and saw the grid itself – rectangular, colorful, and with what looked like a this-will-be-fun-to-crack complicated-looking network spanning the middle, I smiled with anticipation. Not just inwardly smiled, but the real deal.
That network turned out to be not so complicated, but I was already charmed, and the good mood held throughout the fill-in.
Paolo loves to wordplay in his clues. This is the man who once took an ordinary answer – HELMET – and made it extraordinary through his clue [Knight cap]. Today he did the same with RENT (clued “Number for a letter?”), GREENHOUSE (clued “What has a lot of room to grow?”), and NONS, (clued “Negative Nancy words?”).
That last one is SO clever. Sure, punning on the French city Nancy has happened aplenty in crosswords. But here, Paolo beautifully misdirects, because a “Negative Nancy” is a thing, like a Debby Downer and Doubting Thomas. So, Paolo’s clue double hides the Nancy pun – brilliant!
Fun to see ARCANA hiding in EAR CANAL, and lovely to see the gorgeous phrase TIME AND TIDE.
Good vibes all around. Paolo, this had to be a tough tough build. Thank you for putting in the effort, because it sure paid off for me!
I’m another one in the camp who has a touch of color blindness so it wasn’t any fun at all to try and discern the letters or even where I was in the grid. Fortunately, once you got the gimmick sussed out, you could drop in about half of the grid since most of the colored stuff was Monday-easy.
It’s kind of sad to see the NYT go in this direction. At one time, if they weren’t the Gold Standard, they were definitely top three. The stuff they are willing to publish these days makes me feel like I’m attending the CrossWorld equivalent of some type of a circus. Yea, it’s cute/fun for about three minutes - then it is loud and annoying.
Somehow I missed Night Shift completely (maybe because I’m older than Rex), but I was definitely going to many movies in those days. Looks like something I Must Check Out.
Huge Olympics fan and I watch as much as I can. The first TV I ever bought was a 12" black-and-white, bought solely in order to watch the Olympics (Los Angles, 1984).
Last I knew it was impossible to find Moonlighting reruns due to copyright issues with the music. I guess that’s been resolve and now I NEED to go find it.
Easy answers, ridiculously difficult solving experience thanks to the design. The best thing about this puzzle was getting through it and hearing Linda Ronstadt, then, even better, the incomparable original by Roy Orbison (thanks, @Son Volt).
Awful solving experience in the multicolored portions of the grid when using the app. Would suggest using light gray circles (as used in other NYT puzzles)for the cells in the Olympic rings, and let the puzzler discover the colors that complete the answers. Might make the puzzle a tad harder, but should be more enjoyable. The app could then color them in at the end.
As mentioned already, the puzzle (the rings )was annoyingly such a PITA to solve in the app, kinda ruined everything. That combined with all the PPP keeps this far away from easiest Sunday ever. To me. But yes, it was easy.
But at least we got some Night Shift talk from Rex. Bill might be one of my favorite movie characters from my adolescence as well. “Take live tuna fish and feed ‘em mayonnaise. Oh, this is good. Call Starkist”
I need to stop reading this blog because it just crushes my self-esteem. I found this to be challenging and frankly quite annoying. I had OLYMPIC RING instead of OLYMPIC FLAG and because I haven't been studying my Chinese museum designers lately, I wasn't able to figure out that section. I'm also not 80 years old so I don't listen to Linda Ronstadt, and "range war" is not a thing.
I just knew that people would gripe about the colored rings in the grid. I confess I had an internal groan when I first opened the puzzle, quickly figured it was Olympics, but then opened my mind to solve. Yes, easy, but also turned out to be a lot of fun.
@Lewis… You are channeling @egs with DENIAL RIVER!
My local PETCO went out of business but I guess the chain still exists. I see that OLIVE did an encore as a pizza topping. Seems like a “supreme” pizza wouldn’t include a “divisive” topping…
OTTOMANSETS. Yep. They’re a thing. I briefly flirted with the idea of a set to provide extra seating when I host book club. I decided that one club skews old enough that some folks might not be able to get up (the other half and half) so I deep-sixed the idea. But…if I was in a younger crowd, I’d opt for use since they are more attractive than a folding chair!
@Anon 9:33 - I took it as a play on sublet (a person who sublets a property is called a "sublessor" or "subletter" ). I don’t know - there may be a better interpretation, but that’s all I’ve got on that one.
Hey All ! Although a nice puz concept, things got a bit hairy trying to follow the words through all the colors doing the puz online. Normally (on my NYTXW subscription place), the highlighted clue/answer appears as a nice shade of blue, but when you throw in the colors, the place you're at gets lost. Especially with multiple color answers. You're forced to look at the clue number, then squint to find it in the grid.
I'm betting @Nancy wanted no part of this. Even though she does it in the paper. Is there colored squares in the newspaper?
I did like Rex did, tried to get all the color ring answers, after figuring out that was what was wanted. Got most of them, then went through that whole center/ring/color/tough to see section to get that done first. A few Yowsers in there in the cluing. I understand you want to be creative in your cluing, but when it's tough to see where you're at, perhaps a few more straightforward clues are in order.
I do think it is a well constructed puz. To have the Ring Colors set in place, and Three additional Themers all crammed in, it's really tough (really) to get any semblance of clean fill. So kudos to Paolo for even thinking about, never mind making, this puzzle
I'm not going to TAKE THE BAIT and look for OTTOMAN SETS.
A truck carrying Lithium -Ion FUEL CELLS crashed on I-15 by Baker, CA, closing the highway this weekend. The batteries caught fire, and spewed toxic fumes everywhere. I-15 is the main artery twixt Las Vegas and Southern California. Nightmare traffic jams.
Who had THE OLYMPICS first? (It fits!)Go Team USA! Happy Sunday!
I enjoyed Rex's aside about Night Shift more than the puzzle. I loved that movie and had a huge crush on Michael Keaton. Also, I agree ottoman sets is totally weird.
Not much time this morning--we have a 6-letter Hidden Diagonal Word (HDW), the third in 4 days. It's the kind of word that would cause many of us to roll our eyes, but it checks out as a word in online dictionaries: AGREER (and, of course, the 5-letter AGREE, which appeared as an answer in yesterday's grid).
I'll give you the joy of finding it. (Hint: Alfred Hitchcock's 1959 film, North by Northwest.)
I may be conflating two episodes, but in my favorite CHEERS memory Cliff says he has worked out the numerology on all of the U.S. Presidents and can safely predict that the next one will be named Yelnac McWawa. And Frazier looks at him and says, "Tell me, Clifford. What color is the sky in your world?"
Every puzzle teaches you something -- and I had just found out that there's an ORANGE PANDA. Who knew?
I knew nothing about the ORANGE restaurant and decided to come back to it, but I'm pretty familiar with "The Crucible". And for the life of me, I couldn't think of anything about the play that was an allegory of something ORANGE.
An ORANGE ALERT? It's not impossible, although the one I'm most familiar with is R--
Hold on a sec! Could it be that this undeniably ORANGE color* was supposed to be....RED???!!!
The BLUE that also could have been PURPLE didn't faze me for a moment. It was halfway between the two colors, so I picked the one that worked best for the theme. No problem at all.
But no one on the planet could possibly have thought at first glance that the squares masquerading as REDs were anything but ORANGE.
Message to the NYTXW staff: If everyone in your department is completely color blind, stop publishing crosswords that have a color theme! Okay? Are we good?
*As the color appears in the magazine. How it looked on an app, I have no idea.
I did the print edition. The blue ring was a lilac colour and the black ring was a brown colour. The red ring was orange coloured. The gimmick needed to make sure the printers could pull this off. They didn’t. The editor should have pulled the plug on this one.
ok, take a 6 letter word and drop a vowel. you go from aweful to awful. basically this puzzle in a nutshell. not sure why the NYT likes to do these sorts of clues. bar/bra, Streep/strep, etc. they're dumb. and if you think "aweful" isn't a word,
I assure you if Mr. Darcy was not such a great tall fellow, in comparison with myself, I should not pay him half so much deference. I declare I do not know a more aweful object than Darcy, on particular occasions, and in particular places; his own house especially, and of a Sunday evening when he has nothing to do.
The best selling book in the Turkish Empire was "The Joy of OTTOMANSETS" which dealt extensively with the GSPOT.
The phonic dupe of SYNE brought memories of our traditional New Years Eve song:
Should old acquaintance be forgot And never brought to mind? Should old acquaintance be forgot In lieu of DOLLARSIGNS?
I hear they're making a sequel to No Country for Old Men. It's called NOLAN for Old Ladies.
I guess we now know why the star of Funny Girl was nicknamed Pull up/push up Streisand.
I agree that this wasn't the funnest solve ever, but I applaud the concept (thanks, Paolo Pasco) and the willingness to try different types of puzzles (thanks, Joel Fagliano).
Fun puzzle! I also got hung up on a few places in the bottom of the grid, but overall smooth sailing.
My only real complaint was 39D! As a rock climber, it’s always fun to see things referencing my hobby, but not so fun when the clue is just wrong! In rock climbing, the word “crag” refers to the area the cliffs are located, e.g. “yeah, I’m headed out to the crag this weekend,” not an individual climbing hold (e.g. crimp, jug, sloper, pinch). A little thing, but it stands out as something that could use a little more research, or even a quick google.
After reading a couple of complaints in the comments, I'm glad I decided to use my usual platform for solving and not the NYT app, though I was tempted upon seeing the colors in the NYT grid while I was using scraper to get the puz file.
However, knowing the Olympic rings were in the grid only helped in a couple areas until I finally had the AHA moment at BLUE STATE. Up until then, I was having trouble filling in the colored areas which were mere circles on my grid.
I have never seen "The Crucible" and was unaware of its allegorical reference to the RED SCARE although it's mentioned in the first Wikipedia paragraph about it. I've never been drawn to stories about the Salem witch trials and that's my excuse for such ignorance.
14A's clue had me wondering how LYE ever became part of food prep. Bagels and lutefisk.
While, yes, though it was easy, I enjoyed it. In the printout, the "color" squares were all grey so there was an aha built in. Why they added the colors in the app is beyond me... It removed the one challenge in the puzzle.
Given the theme, I'd like to have seen more Olympics references in the puzzle. Yes, there was some short fill: RUN, TIE, TOE, PRELIM, (yellow)CARDS, ERR, ONE. And 2 re baseball, which isn't in the 2024 games, but will be in 2028. But there coulda shoulda been more use of long fill. And since when is gray black? And pinkish-orange red? Yes, I know. It's a necessary cheat. But I initially found myself wondering what racoon-like mammal is pinkish-orange.
This was fun, creative & timely. I don't know if it was the easiest Sunday of all time, as I'm going back to look for my typo (ONCE AGAIN). I used to be lauded for being such a fast typist (back in the day) but now it works against me :( Thanks for a fun Sunday Paolo :)
I thought this puzzle was much, much too easy. I saw how off the colors were in the physical copy of the Times that I solve on, and went back to the actual Olympic flag to see that the one ring is black and not grey. But the first themed answer I got was so unambiguous ("they fly somewhere over the rainbow" can only be one thing) that the entire rings section just filled in so easily. I thought some of the clueing was very clever, as noted by some other commenters (I also thought "bugs, e.g" for VWs was fun) but overall this was done in a personal best time, to invoke a sports theme; but unfortunately that's not the thing I'm looking for in a puzzle.
I also want to say that it must be very hard for a constructor to gauge the difficulty or the experience of a person solving the puzzle. Respect to anyone that can construct one!
I turned off the colors in the app because they were so distracting. Was over halfway done when I realized what was going on and boy did it become a heck of a lot easier when the entire middle stopped being nonsense.
Anonymous 1:11 About Negev Negev obscure? Hamas only last October attacked Israelis in the Negev! Not exactly a minor news item, which caused an ongoing war. Notice there weren’t a lot of complaints about it. Also as someone noted above, it has been in the Times puzzle dozens of occasions. We can’t know everything. So just because I don’t know something I don’t assume it’s obscure.
Like @pabloinnh, my puzzle was black and white so it offered a bit more bite. After solving I went online to see the colors - very pretty but glad I didn’t have the help.
Reading @Rex I see I DNF’d with NaGEV/aLLIE. Couldn’t decide how to spell NEGEV and ELLIE was a WOE. Considered the E but decided ‘Carl and aLLIE’ had a nicer RING. C’est la vie.
Hand up for 'the olympics' before OLYMPIC FLAG. Hi, @Roo - and congrats on your book!
No OLIVE wreath?
In the ancient Olympic Games there were no gold, silver, or bronze medals. There was only one winner per event, crowned with an OLIVE wreath made of wild OLIVE leaves from a sacred tree near the temple of Zeus at Olympia. -Wiki
Once again Across Lite rules! I saw the note so I took a screen shot of the web version to have on my other monitor; often this is a waste of time but not today as it was invaluable to getting the gimmick. (My only nit is the black ring is actually grey.) And except for a bunch of circles, there was nothing unusual distracting me from where in the grid I was typing. Best of both worlds!
OLIVE pizza topping again. Last night I had pizza with sliced black olives on top; honest.
I did the puzzle on my iPad using the NYT Games app for iPad. There were no colors, just gray squares. I had to infer the colors but that was not much of a problem.
95D: It would be more appropriate to say "Part of a FEMALE's anatomy..." instead of "Part of a WOMAN's anatomy..." because we're talking about biological sex here vs. gender, which is a sociological construct. In other words, not all people who identify as 'woman' would have 'female' genital structures.
Perhaps this post should have a trigger warning but here goes. The feminist movement in the late 60s and 70s confronted the many sexist ideas about women and sex. The false idea that women didn't feel desire as much as men did and that whatever gave men pleasure was what should give women pleasure too. The word clitoris became known. Women began asserting themselves in the bedroom. Then along comes Dr. G whose supposed discovery of the g-spot was an attempt to once again make heterosexual sex a phallic worship ritual.
There is a bridge in Seattle named for Jose Rizal, connecting Beacon Hill with the Chinatown/International District. I've biked across it a gazillion times, there is a long bike path that has a spur that connects to the bridge. So 28 Across was a gimme for me.
I'm with Lewis. I thought the puzzle great fun. And I did find it had bite There were times when I began to growl at certain clues. In fact I never understood 84A "number for a letter" until reading Lewis write up. He didn't explain, but it suddenly came to me that the amount of rent is a number and a renter is a letter. I growled at myself over not getting 100A until crosses filled it in. I mean really, gardening i my thing. True I dont have a greenhouse, but how could I not pop that one right in. I printed off from the NYT on line puzzle and did not have Nancys' problem with the red. But I did object to 38A "malevolent sorcery" being "magic" until I realized that grey was supposed to be black.
TLDR as texters apparently say. Unfortunately true for puzzle, Rex & commentariat today. Ugly display on iPhone didn’t help since finding the cursor among the the overlapping colors of the oversized grid was a step beyond the usual Sunday slog. Did the colors, glanced at OFL’s opening graphs and just came here to whine. Sorry, now I feel better
Anon 2:15 - Und is a german word that translates to "and" which is a conjunction (connector/connection) at Frankfurt Germany airport.
Anon 2:26 - If something is canted, it is askew or deviating from either the vertical or horizontal. Thus, it cants. Synonyms of 'canted': atilt, leaning, tilted, tipped.
As another color-blind solver, I’ll add my voice to the others. This was a terrible experience. Not only could I not see where I was in the puzzle, I didn’t get any of the higher-level wordplay.
I solve a PC using the NYT app. There were way more than five colors involved in the five squared rings. If I click on 36 Across, for instance, that square goes from a blueish color to an OLIVE drab. As I move the cursor to each subsequent 36A square, this blueish to OLIVE pattern repeats.
If I change the direction to 36 Down, the middle five white squares change to blue. But this blue is distinctly different from the blue in the squared ring. And as I move the cursor to each one of these now blue squares, it changes to yellow. Wow.
This now-one-color-now-another and "Where's my cursor?" continues throughout the entire squared rings section. I lost count of the different colors and would need an extensive COLOR WHEEL to name them all. To say it was off-putting would be an understatement. My hat's off to those who were able to navigate through this maze. For me it was an early "Um, bye".
Echo chamber here: admirable construction, easy to solve - except for nightmare city in the colored areas in the app. @Rex - thanks for explaining NONS. I totally feel for Negative Nancy. @Lewis - thank you for DENIAL RIVER! —Carola
That took some doing. Enjoyable but kinda tough seeing which squares needed attention with the colors. Worth the effort (probably), but on line-by-line review it's awfully gunky and has way too many oofs.
I saw multi-piece furniture and in my head I went to IKEA and became obsessed with kits. I kept wondering what an OTTOMAN kit would look like. Took forever to realize it was SETS.
1 Frodo's tool for redecorating Bilbo's pad. 2 Price to put your feet up. 3 Distribute devilish dodo. 4 Notice: Y'alls pizza down h'yar is divisive.
1 RING BEARER COLOR WHEEL 2 OTTOMAN SETS DOLLAR SIGNS 3 PRINT MAGIC ROBIN 4 BAYOU OLIVE ALERT
My Fascinating Crossword Uniclue Keepsake from Last Year: "Sit in a recliner and do a puzzle," and, "Offer your opinion of an opinion on Blogger" among others. GREAT ONE CREDOS.
OK here's the NEGEV NEGEB thing from an Israeli. Negev in Hebrew is spelled Nun-Gimel-Bet (the vowels are usually understood, although in literary texts and kids' books they appear under the letters) and so reading from right to left this is how the word looks in a vowelled text: נֶגֶב The three little dots arranged twice like inverted triangles under the first two letter (Nun and Gimel) give the sound "e" as in "egg." The last (leftmost) letter is the "Bet" (the 2nd letter of the Hebrew alphabet corresponding to the Greek "beta" and the English "b"). However, and here's the rub, when the "Bet" occurs at the end of the word (and in quite a lot of other circumstances) it is sounded not as a "b" but as a "v". Thus any unvowelled book or newspaper would simply write נגב In vowelled texts, the accented "b" sound of the "Bet" is indicated by a dot in the middle of the "Bet" (absent, like the vowels, in ordinary texts such as newspapers, etc., you just get used to reading without the vowels and the accents). Thus the classic three-letter word for a house ("bayit") (probably the source of the shape of the letter "Bet" by the way), looks like this (Bet-Yod-Tav): בַּיִת The vowelling has a little line under the "Bet" (the vowel sounds more or less like "u" in "hut") and a dot under the "Yod" that sounds like the "i" in "pin." But if you look carefully at the "Bet" of "bayit" you'll make out the dot inside it that tells to pronounce it "b" (accented) and not "v" (unaccented). Again in an ordinary text, the word is unvowelled and looks like this בית As you can now see, the "Bet" in "Negev" and the "Bet" in "bayit" look just the same in unvowelled texts. I'm not a linguist, but I note that academicians (typically confusingly) like to keep the accentuated "bet" when they transliterate to English and so "Negev" come out "Negeb" in academic writing, and that's why it occasionally appears thus in NYT crosswords But "Negev" it is in all spoken Hebrew; if you asked for a bus to the "Negeb" I don't think they'll know what you're talking about.
One of my male Rexblog pals mentioned that he perceived the squares that I saw as orange to be red, but that his wife, like me, also saw them as orange. I thought I remembered from reading it somewhere long ago that men are MUCH more prone to color blindness than women. So I looked it up just now -- and it's true. There's a BIG difference between the sexes. Here's what I found:
"Color blindness is more commonly expressed in men than in women. Nearly 1 in 12 men experience color blindness, while only 1 in 200 women experience colorblindness. This is a drastic gap between genders concerning color vision, and the reasoning behind it is genetics." Sep 21, 2020
I don't have a NYT subscription, I actually had to do the puzzle colorless (Anonymous @6:44) and it was still easy. I jumped to the bottom of the grid after getting RINGBEARER, and I actually had to work a bit for OLYMPIC FLAG since 1) without color, I didn't notice the five rings right away, and 2) I actually wasn't expecting an Olympics-themed puzzle but I really should have, everyone did it this week (LAT today, WSJ on Thursday, Universal on Friday).
The first theme answers I got were HOUSE (which I just shrugged at, not knowing that GREEN was missing) and CARDS which makes sense even without YELLOW. With (YELLOW)STONE, I saw what was going on and managed to finish in Easy time. Not as fast as July 14th (the palindrome theme), but only slightly slower, which says something about how easy it must've been for those who had the OLYMPIC FLAG shown to them from the get-go. I only had a bit of trouble around 73A where I saw through the "round" trick but blitzed out PREGAME from PR___M_.
Absolutely horrible solving experience. Couldn’t read the clues, the numbers or follow the progression with the colors. As someone above said, NYT just because you can doesn’t mean you should.
First time I've walked away from a Sunday puzzle. And my better half did as well.
NYT - ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION TO YOUR SUBSCRIBERS?! Evidently not. Stop with the gimmicks! Especially something like this that takes over the entire real estate!
Overall, I liked the puzzle. I always work the NYT crossword on paper so the colors showed well, except for the black/gray ones, and maybe the orange vs red ones. The thing I was most appreciative for was that the puzzle didn't dwell on various names of the different Olympic sports!! That can be very annoying sometimes, especially if we have to associate the names of the athletes to them. Once I figured out "Blue Bayou", things went pretty quick!!
In school 60 years ago I learned the significance of the colors, green for the forests of Europe and blue for Australia and Oceania. The rest is obvious, and totally stupid
I’m old school I guess, I print the puzzle, so I never saw the colored squares, they were all just gray when printed from the website, I agree it was fairly easy anyway but I was thinking some of the answers were missing parts. On the other hand, I’ve often heard ‘(blue)print’ shortened to ‘print’ and I thought (black)sheep could also refer to (lost) sheep. ‘Salsa’ ,‘cards’, and ‘alert’ made sense without a color. I was pretty sure the Linda Rondstat hit was ‘Blue Bayou’ but not a big enough fan to be certain of the title.
Also I don’t pay attention to the Olympics, so I couldn’t tell you what order the colored rings are in. Totally agree that if I’d seen the colors it would’ve bedn too easy for a Sunday, but without them it was only a bit easier than normal.
After the themeless challenges of Friday and Saturday, a fun puff piece is welcome. The timing for us in Syndiland is not the opening, but the closing of the 2024 Olympiad, highlighted by Team USA's thrilling 67-66 victory over host France for women's basketball gold. WTG, ladies! You are all co-DODs here!
Kudos to PP for this densely themed--and pretty!--puzzle. Easy to solve; most likely much harder to construct. A bit more resistance would've made this an eagle; birdie for sure.
In syndiland here, I was given the rings all in grey. I thought part of the puzzle was to recall the location of the various colored rings. @rex on 81A — black onion was a consideration for you?!?
This is a very rare case where I found the puzzle actually improved in syndication because it couldn't be fully reproduced. At least on the Seattle Times site, they couldn't show the colors, so the color-themed answers were simply shaded. It was left to the solver to figure out that the shade represented colors and what colors they were. Made the solve more challenging and the revealer much more interesting--oh, they're not just answers preceded by colors, they're colored RINGS! Nice!
The CCR clue made everything fall into place. For those unhappy app solvers maybe go out and purchase the Sunday paper ? And Rex - connect the colors with circles, not squares ! Olympic Boxes is an oxymoron. Excellent Sunday puzzle IMHO !
If you solved in the app, as I did, the proliferation of colored squares made the experience truly horrible. I had no idea where I was, and there was no ability to get a holistic sense of progress in the middle.
ReplyDeleteTrue!!!
DeleteBrutally hard to see, especially when done on the sofa at night, had no idea where I was. Yeah got the theme and pretty easy to fill in the whole center
DeleteI came to say this. I don’t m is what it looks like in print but on my phone I couldn’t tell where I was and so a lot of the words I’d filled in didn’t seem to go with the clue I thought I was on. Fun concept and an easy puzzle but filling it out was awful.
DeleteYou're absolutely right it was horrible in the app. So many times I've had to go to the list of clues then go back to the grid and figure out where I was. Wasted a lot of time just trying to navigate. I found it.so annoying.
DeleteYeah. I went to the options and turned the overlay off. Was annoying otherwise. Unfortunately, it was then a long time before I realized the color mattered.
DeleteYes. At least half the solve time today was just spent trying to figure out where I was typing. The theme was easy to get early. The rest of the experience was no fun at all. Powered through to keep the steak going, but otherwise I would have been happy to skip this one.
DeleteFor solving in the NYT app:
DeleteHit the settings button, scroll down to 'Other', then de-select "Show Overlays".
This will make the colors appear as grey squares.
And I agree, the colors made the puzzle garishly frustrating!
The colours were also present on the website: I agree they made solving harder.
DeleteIt made my eyes hurt. I haaaaaated it
DeleteI had a worse experience. I printed the puzzle on a black/white printer and had to go look at the screen version to see the colors. Yellow and green were essentially white so solving BELLY and HOUSE were almost impossible, and I got them entirely from the crosses.
DeleteLeave it to Paolo to come up with something so creative for such a boring theme. I think the only time the Summer Olympics ever interested me was the year Dave Wottle ran. I like hockey and skiing and bobsled etc - always seemed to be too much drama in the summer.
ReplyDeleteThe original
Definitely easy as the big guy highlights - I finished in one long across + down pass. The color gimmick made it feel like a Highlights puzzle - not much thought involved. I did like the OCEAN - TERNS stack especially since I’m on my way to the beach for an early morning ride.
Not much for me here.
Linda also covered this one - Dallas ALICE
Apparently none of the whiz-bang designers of the digital version on the app actually ever tried to solve this on the NYTimes app. The colored-in squares make it impossible to follow the highlights indicating whether your direction is down or up. Amazingly frustrating. Hey NYTimes: Just because you CAN do something, doesn't mean you should (an admonition apparently utterly unknown to this generation of techies).
ReplyDeleteWell, how can you not love a puzzle whose 13th column begins with DENIAL RIVER?
ReplyDeleteExceptionally easy, but I’ll take it on a Sunday. After I finished filling in the rings, I was delighted to realize how close I was to the bottom. On most Sundays, that’s normally the point where I think “Will this ever end?”
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteYes, the puzzle was both timely and clever, but it felt like it belonged in People magazine.
For starters, maybe the editors could have left out the colors.
tc
My sentiments exactly... Hope Gary posts his gunk gauge today... We may have a new winner!
DeleteCute and breezy. Agree with so many 3-, 4-, and 5-letter answers, this went quickly despite a fair bit of PPP. I only got held up briefly by initially going with HEAVY instead of HEFTY at 100D.
ReplyDeleteI think the "audio only" concept in 83D means there's no video; perhaps Rex is overthinking things to state that cerumen, etc., can end up in the EARCANAL.
I cringed a little when we had to think back to the Teletubbies, trying to sing the theme song to come up with LAALAA. Our kids watched them over and over and over [ad nauseam]... Mesmerizing to the young brain.
Citius, Altius, Fortius!
Entertaining write-up! Puzzle, not so much. After Blue Bayou, I was able to fill in all the other theme answers pronto. Liked the clues better than you did, but Anita Baker is best described as a jazz singer, not a soul singer. Just like cluing Etta James as a jazz singer rather than a soul singer, which seems to have become the norm. Some crossover, sure, but still incorrect for both, in my view.
ReplyDeletePretty much agree with all of this. Interesting premise, and impressive construction, but it made for a REALLY quick solve. But given the weight of the theme, it was impressively clean, with not a lot of ugliness.
ReplyDeleteI also agree that solving in the app was horrendous given the colors. I kept losing track of where my "cursor" was.
And thanks, Rex - I now looked up Peter Graves and discovered that I'm OLDER than he was when he made Airplane. Now I need to go take a nap...
As a color-blind solver working the puzzle online this was an awful solving experience. As others have said it was very difficult for me to see which cell I had highlighted, but I would add that it was also really difficult to see what I had previously typed in some of the cells due to contrast. Cool concept Paolo but please don't ever do it again Joel.
ReplyDeleteDefinitely a formatting gimmick taken too far - you can add my voice the growing chorus of solvers who felt that the color scheme actively hindered solving. Having sussed out the obvious function of the colored rings my brain wanted to pair the black ring clues with GRAY instead of BLACK ("what on earth is a GRAY SHEEP, is that a thing too?"), since that was the color they had to go with for practical reasons. The puzzle would have been more enjoyable if there had been no coloring at all and was only revealed (online at least) upon completion, perhaps using one of those "tada!" animations (grating, but at least not so in the way) NYT website is so fond of recently.
ReplyDeleteWhen I saw Paolo’s name atop the grid (I love his clever puzzles), and saw the grid itself – rectangular, colorful, and with what looked like a this-will-be-fun-to-crack complicated-looking network spanning the middle, I smiled with anticipation. Not just inwardly smiled, but the real deal.
ReplyDeleteThat network turned out to be not so complicated, but I was already charmed, and the good mood held throughout the fill-in.
Paolo loves to wordplay in his clues. This is the man who once took an ordinary answer – HELMET – and made it extraordinary through his clue [Knight cap]. Today he did the same with RENT (clued “Number for a letter?”), GREENHOUSE (clued “What has a lot of room to grow?”), and NONS, (clued “Negative Nancy words?”).
That last one is SO clever. Sure, punning on the French city Nancy has happened aplenty in crosswords. But here, Paolo beautifully misdirects, because a “Negative Nancy” is a thing, like a Debby Downer and Doubting Thomas. So, Paolo’s clue double hides the Nancy pun – brilliant!
Fun to see ARCANA hiding in EAR CANAL, and lovely to see the gorgeous phrase TIME AND TIDE.
Good vibes all around. Paolo, this had to be a tough tough build. Thank you for putting in the effort, because it sure paid off for me!
Explain why “Rent” is the answer to the Clue “Number for a letter?”
DeleteSomeone who rents is a letter (renter) as in sublet. Number is used to mean amount. Therefore, “Amount for a renter”.
DeleteDidn't even bother finishing this one, b/c it was tedious as all get-out, and visually atrocious. NEXT!
ReplyDeleteI’m another one in the camp who has a touch of color blindness so it wasn’t any fun at all to try and discern the letters or even where I was in the grid. Fortunately, once you got the gimmick sussed out, you could drop in about half of the grid since most of the colored stuff was Monday-easy.
ReplyDeleteIt’s kind of sad to see the NYT go in this direction. At one time, if they weren’t the Gold Standard, they were definitely top three. The stuff they are willing to publish these days makes me feel like I’m attending the CrossWorld equivalent of some type of a circus. Yea, it’s cute/fun for about three minutes - then it is loud and annoying.
For those who like seeing the rectangular grid, take a look at two rectangular grids on steroids by Kevin Der:
ReplyDelete• https://www.xwordinfo.com/Crossword?date=4/15/2012
• https://www.xwordinfo.com/Crossword?date=3/27/2011
(These show the grids with the answers. If you haven’t done these puzzles and wish to, you can find them in the archives: 4/15/2012 and 3/27/2011.)
Somehow I missed Night Shift completely (maybe because I’m older than Rex), but I was definitely going to many movies in those days. Looks like something I Must Check Out.
ReplyDeleteCall Starkist link isn’t working!
Huge Olympics fan and I watch as much as I can. The first TV I ever bought was a 12" black-and-white, bought solely in order to watch the Olympics (Los Angles, 1984).
ReplyDeleteAnd my earliest Olympic memory is watching Olga Korbut at Munich.
Last I knew it was impossible to find Moonlighting reruns due to copyright issues with the music. I guess that’s been resolve and now I NEED to go find it.
Easy answers, ridiculously difficult solving experience thanks to the design. The best thing about this puzzle was getting through it and hearing Linda Ronstadt, then, even better, the incomparable original by Roy Orbison (thanks, @Son Volt).
ReplyDeleteFun. Lots of head scratching until I got the theme. I print the puzzles on a B&W printer. Haha.
ReplyDeleteYes, in the printed version, the theme answers were shaded, but not colored.
DeleteMonday comes to Sunday. I miss the days when the Sunday puzzle made you think.
ReplyDeleteAwful solving experience in the multicolored portions of the grid when using the app. Would suggest using light gray circles (as used in other NYT puzzles)for the cells in the Olympic rings, and let the puzzler discover the colors that complete the answers. Might make the puzzle a tad harder, but should be more enjoyable. The app could then color them in at the end.
ReplyDeleteAs mentioned already, the puzzle (the rings )was annoyingly such a PITA to solve in the app, kinda ruined everything. That combined with all the PPP keeps this far away from easiest Sunday ever. To me. But yes, it was easy.
ReplyDeleteBut at least we got some Night Shift talk from Rex. Bill might be one of my favorite movie characters from my adolescence as well. “Take live tuna fish and feed ‘em mayonnaise. Oh, this is good. Call Starkist”
I need to stop reading this blog because it just crushes my self-esteem. I found this to be challenging and frankly quite annoying. I had OLYMPIC RING instead of OLYMPIC FLAG and because I haven't been studying my Chinese museum designers lately, I wasn't able to figure out that section. I'm also not 80 years old so I don't listen to Linda Ronstadt, and "range war" is not a thing.
ReplyDeleteCan anybody explain the "number for a letter" clue? Makes no sense to me.
ReplyDeleteLetter being someone renting an apartment
DeleteTHANK YOU!
DeleteI just knew that people would gripe about the colored rings in the grid. I confess I had an internal groan when I first opened the puzzle, quickly figured it was Olympics, but then opened my mind to solve. Yes, easy, but also turned out to be a lot of fun.
ReplyDelete@Lewis… You are channeling @egs with DENIAL RIVER!
My local PETCO went out of business but I guess the chain still exists. I see that OLIVE did an encore as a pizza topping. Seems like a “supreme” pizza wouldn’t include a “divisive” topping…
OTTOMANSETS. Yep. They’re a thing. I briefly flirted with the idea of a set to provide extra seating when I host book club. I decided that one club skews old enough that some folks might not be able to get up (the other half and half) so I deep-sixed the idea. But…if I was in a younger crowd, I’d opt for use since they are more attractive than a folding chair!
@Anon 9:33 - I took it as a play on sublet (a person who sublets a property is called a "sublessor" or "subletter" ). I don’t know - there may be a better interpretation, but that’s all I’ve got on that one.
ReplyDeleteHey All !
ReplyDeleteAlthough a nice puz concept, things got a bit hairy trying to follow the words through all the colors doing the puz online. Normally (on my NYTXW subscription place), the highlighted clue/answer appears as a nice shade of blue, but when you throw in the colors, the place you're at gets lost. Especially with multiple color answers. You're forced to look at the clue number, then squint to find it in the grid.
I'm betting @Nancy wanted no part of this. Even though she does it in the paper. Is there colored squares in the newspaper?
I did like Rex did, tried to get all the color ring answers, after figuring out that was what was wanted. Got most of them, then went through that whole center/ring/color/tough to see section to get that done first. A few Yowsers in there in the cluing. I understand you want to be creative in your cluing, but when it's tough to see where you're at, perhaps a few more straightforward clues are in order.
I do think it is a well constructed puz. To have the Ring Colors set in place, and Three additional Themers all crammed in, it's really tough (really) to get any semblance of clean fill. So kudos to Paolo for even thinking about, never mind making, this puzzle
I'm not going to TAKE THE BAIT and look for OTTOMAN SETS.
A truck carrying Lithium -Ion FUEL CELLS crashed on I-15 by Baker, CA, closing the highway this weekend. The batteries caught fire, and spewed toxic fumes everywhere. I-15 is the main artery twixt Las Vegas and Southern California. Nightmare traffic jams.
Who had THE OLYMPICS first? (It fits!)Go Team USA! Happy Sunday!
Two F's
RooMonster
DarrinV
Yep - kept THE OLYMPICS in for far too long!
DeleteI enjoyed Rex's aside about Night Shift more than the puzzle. I loved that movie and had a huge crush on Michael Keaton. Also, I agree ottoman sets is totally weird.
ReplyDeleteNot much time this morning--we have a 6-letter Hidden Diagonal Word (HDW), the third in 4 days. It's the kind of word that would cause many of us to roll our eyes, but it checks out as a word in online dictionaries: AGREER (and, of course, the 5-letter AGREE, which appeared as an answer in yesterday's grid).
ReplyDeleteI'll give you the joy of finding it. (Hint: Alfred Hitchcock's 1959 film, North by Northwest.)
I may be conflating two episodes, but in my favorite CHEERS memory Cliff says he has worked out the numerology on all of the U.S. Presidents and can safely predict that the next one will be named Yelnac McWawa. And Frazier looks at him and says, "Tell me, Clifford. What color is the sky in your world?"
ReplyDeleteEvery puzzle teaches you something -- and I had just found out that there's an ORANGE PANDA. Who knew?
ReplyDeleteI knew nothing about the ORANGE restaurant and decided to come back to it, but I'm pretty familiar with "The Crucible". And for the life of me, I couldn't think of anything about the play that was an allegory of something ORANGE.
An ORANGE ALERT? It's not impossible, although the one I'm most familiar with is R--
Hold on a sec! Could it be that this undeniably ORANGE color* was supposed to be....RED???!!!
The BLUE that also could have been PURPLE didn't faze me for a moment. It was halfway between the two colors, so I picked the one that worked best for the theme. No problem at all.
But no one on the planet could possibly have thought at first glance that the squares masquerading as REDs were anything but ORANGE.
Message to the NYTXW staff: If everyone in your department is completely color blind, stop publishing crosswords that have a color theme! Okay? Are we good?
*As the color appears in the magazine. How it looked on an app, I have no idea.
You can let (rent) an apartment, so the “number for the letter” is the amount you are paying in rent.
ReplyDeleteI just loved this ! Sunday fun breezy and different…thank you Mister Pasco!
ReplyDeleteFun Sunday ! Thanks Paolo ! Glad I bought that color printer !
ReplyDeleteI did the print edition. The blue ring was a lilac colour and the black ring was a brown colour. The red ring was orange coloured. The gimmick needed to make sure the printers could pull this off. They didn’t. The editor should have pulled the plug on this one.
ReplyDeleteThis old timer agrees. The colors in the Magazine were way off. Though obviously black cannot actually be black.
DeleteFrogman
DeleteAbout color (American spelling!)
Exactly!
Colors all wrong. Choppy fill. No zip or zing. A veritable dog’s breakfast. Sundays can and should be better than this!
ReplyDeleteWell, my amazing earlier post didn't make it. Recap:
ReplyDeleteDid it in black and white which made it lots harder but also lots more fun.
I celebrate the return of Hall of Fame Name YMA Sumac.
Pleasantly Perplexing.
The end.
OTTOMANSETS seems contrived.
ReplyDeleteok, take a 6 letter word and drop a vowel. you go from aweful to awful. basically this puzzle in a nutshell. not sure why the NYT likes to do these sorts of clues. bar/bra, Streep/strep, etc. they're dumb. and if you think "aweful" isn't a word,
ReplyDeleteI assure you if Mr. Darcy was not such a great tall fellow, in comparison with myself, I should not pay him half so much deference. I declare I do not know a more aweful object than Darcy, on particular occasions, and in particular places; his own house especially, and of a Sunday evening when he has nothing to do.
Zippy
Yep easy. No erasures and JOSE and CHO were it for WOEs.
ReplyDeleteAn impressive feat of construction, clever, timely, and fun, liked it.
A breezy solve every now and then is a good thing.
The best selling book in the Turkish Empire was "The Joy of OTTOMANSETS" which dealt extensively with the GSPOT.
ReplyDeleteThe phonic dupe of SYNE brought memories of our traditional New Years Eve song:
Should old acquaintance be forgot
And never brought to mind?
Should old acquaintance be forgot
In lieu of DOLLARSIGNS?
I hear they're making a sequel to No Country for Old Men. It's called NOLAN for Old Ladies.
I guess we now know why the star of Funny Girl was nicknamed Pull up/push up Streisand.
I agree that this wasn't the funnest solve ever, but I applaud the concept (thanks, Paolo Pasco) and the willingness to try different types of puzzles (thanks, Joel Fagliano).
Fun puzzle! I also got hung up on a few places in the bottom of the grid, but overall smooth sailing.
ReplyDeleteMy only real complaint was 39D! As a rock climber, it’s always fun to see things referencing my hobby, but not so fun when the clue is just wrong! In rock climbing, the word “crag” refers to the area the cliffs are located, e.g. “yeah, I’m headed out to the crag this weekend,” not an individual climbing hold (e.g. crimp, jug, sloper, pinch). A little thing, but it stands out as something that could use a little more research, or even a quick google.
After reading a couple of complaints in the comments, I'm glad I decided to use my usual platform for solving and not the NYT app, though I was tempted upon seeing the colors in the NYT grid while I was using scraper to get the puz file.
ReplyDeleteHowever, knowing the Olympic rings were in the grid only helped in a couple areas until I finally had the AHA moment at BLUE STATE. Up until then, I was having trouble filling in the colored areas which were mere circles on my grid.
I have never seen "The Crucible" and was unaware of its allegorical reference to the RED SCARE although it's mentioned in the first Wikipedia paragraph about it. I've never been drawn to stories about the Salem witch trials and that's my excuse for such ignorance.
14A's clue had me wondering how LYE ever became part of food prep. Bagels and lutefisk.
Thanks, Paolo Pasco, this was fun.
While, yes, though it was easy, I enjoyed it. In the printout, the "color" squares were all grey so there was an aha built in. Why they added the colors in the app is beyond me... It removed the one challenge in the puzzle.
ReplyDeleteGiven the theme, I'd like to have seen more Olympics references in the puzzle. Yes, there was some short fill: RUN, TIE, TOE, PRELIM, (yellow)CARDS, ERR, ONE. And 2 re baseball, which isn't in the 2024 games, but will be in 2028. But there coulda shoulda been more use of long fill.
ReplyDeleteAnd since when is gray black? And pinkish-orange red? Yes, I know. It's a necessary cheat. But I initially found myself wondering what racoon-like mammal is pinkish-orange.
This was fun, creative & timely. I don't know if it was the easiest Sunday of all time, as I'm going back to look for my typo (ONCE AGAIN). I used to be lauded for being such a fast typist (back in the day) but now it works against me :(
ReplyDeleteThanks for a fun Sunday Paolo :)
I thought this puzzle was much, much too easy. I saw how off the colors were in the physical copy of the Times that I solve on, and went back to the actual Olympic flag to see that the one ring is black and not grey. But the first themed answer I got was so unambiguous ("they fly somewhere over the rainbow" can only be one thing) that the entire rings section just filled in so easily. I thought some of the clueing was very clever, as noted by some other commenters (I also thought "bugs, e.g" for VWs was fun) but overall this was done in a personal best time, to invoke a sports theme; but unfortunately that's not the thing I'm looking for in a puzzle.
ReplyDeleteI also want to say that it must be very hard for a constructor to gauge the difficulty or the experience of a person solving the puzzle. Respect to anyone that can construct one!
Ditto stop the gimmicks there tedious
ReplyDeleteIt’s not griping - solving on the app truly was painful, literally. As in, headache. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteEasy, yes...provided the solver realizes that the color is part of the answer. It took me a while to get that. Very creative effort.
ReplyDeleteI turned off the colors in the app because they were so distracting. Was over halfway done when I realized what was going on and boy did it become a heck of a lot easier when the entire middle stopped being nonsense.
DeleteI guess I need to brush up on Israeli geography as I got natick’d guessing NaGEV/aLLIE
ReplyDeleteAnonymous 1:11
DeleteAbout Negev
Negev obscure?
Hamas only last October attacked Israelis in the Negev!
Not exactly a minor news item, which caused an ongoing war.
Notice there weren’t a lot of complaints about it.
Also as someone noted above, it has been in the Times puzzle dozens of occasions.
We can’t know everything. So just because I don’t know something I don’t assume it’s obscure.
Like @pabloinnh, my puzzle was black and white so it offered a bit more bite. After solving I went online to see the colors - very pretty but glad I didn’t have the help.
ReplyDeleteReading @Rex I see I DNF’d with NaGEV/aLLIE. Couldn’t decide how to spell NEGEV and ELLIE was a WOE. Considered the E but decided ‘Carl and aLLIE’ had a nicer RING. C’est la vie.
Hand up for 'the olympics' before OLYMPIC FLAG. Hi, @Roo - and congrats on your book!
No OLIVE wreath?
In the ancient Olympic Games there were no gold, silver, or bronze medals. There was only one winner per event, crowned with an OLIVE wreath made of wild OLIVE leaves from a sacred tree near the temple of Zeus at Olympia. -Wiki
Once again Across Lite rules! I saw the note so I took a screen shot of the web version to have on my other monitor; often this is a waste of time but not today as it was invaluable to getting the gimmick. (My only nit is the black ring is actually grey.) And except for a bunch of circles, there was nothing unusual distracting me from where in the grid I was typing. Best of both worlds!
ReplyDeleteOLIVE pizza topping again. Last night I had pizza with sliced black olives on top; honest.
I did the puzzle on my iPad using the NYT Games app for iPad. There were no colors, just gray squares. I had to infer the colors but that was not much of a problem.
ReplyDelete95D: It would be more appropriate to say "Part of a FEMALE's anatomy..." instead of "Part of a WOMAN's anatomy..." because we're talking about biological sex here vs. gender, which is a sociological construct. In other words, not all people who identify as 'woman' would have 'female' genital structures.
ReplyDeletePerhaps this post should have a trigger warning but here goes. The feminist movement in the late 60s and 70s confronted the many sexist ideas about women and sex. The false idea that women didn't feel desire as much as men did and that whatever gave men pleasure was what should give women pleasure too. The word clitoris became known. Women began asserting themselves in the bedroom. Then along comes Dr. G whose supposed discovery of the g-spot was an attempt to once again make heterosexual sex a phallic worship ritual.
Deletewhat rgbruno said. completing online was atrocious. couldn't tell where i was in the colored rings.
ReplyDeleteThere is a bridge in Seattle named for Jose Rizal, connecting Beacon Hill with the Chinatown/International District. I've biked across it a gazillion times, there is a long bike path that has a spur that connects to the bridge. So 28 Across was a gimme for me.
ReplyDeleteI don't understand UND for the "Connection at Frankfurt Airport?" clue
ReplyDeleteAND is used as a function word to indicate connection or addition, and in German, AND is UND
DeleteI'm with Lewis. I thought the puzzle great fun. And I did find it had bite There were times when I began to growl at certain clues. In fact I never understood 84A "number for a letter" until reading Lewis write up. He didn't explain, but it suddenly came to me that the amount of rent is a number and a renter is a letter.
ReplyDeleteI growled at myself over not getting 100A until crosses filled it in. I mean really, gardening i my thing. True I dont have a greenhouse, but how could I not pop that one right in.
I printed off from the NYT on line puzzle and did not have Nancys' problem with the red. But I did object to 38A "malevolent sorcery" being "magic" until I realized that grey was supposed to be black.
Good puzzle
I totally agree with Mrs. Rex about the weirdness of OTTOMAN SETS.
ReplyDeleteWould someone be kind enough to explain 6 Down? Sloping surfaces = cants?
ReplyDeleteTLDR as texters apparently say. Unfortunately true for puzzle, Rex & commentariat today. Ugly display on iPhone didn’t help since finding the cursor among the the overlapping colors of the oversized grid was a step beyond the usual Sunday slog. Did the colors, glanced at OFL’s opening graphs and just came here to whine. Sorry, now I feel better
ReplyDeleteAnon 2:15 - Und is a german word that translates to "and" which is a conjunction (connector/connection) at Frankfurt Germany airport.
ReplyDeleteAnon 2:26 - If something is canted, it is askew or deviating from either the vertical or horizontal. Thus, it cants. Synonyms of 'canted': atilt, leaning, tilted, tipped.
As another color-blind solver, I’ll add my voice to the others. This was a terrible experience. Not only could I not see where I was in the puzzle, I didn’t get any of the higher-level wordplay.
ReplyDeleteThanks!
kj (Bardfilm)
I solve a PC using the NYT app. There were way more than five colors involved in the five squared rings. If I click on 36 Across, for instance, that square goes from a blueish color to an OLIVE drab. As I move the cursor to each subsequent 36A square, this blueish to OLIVE pattern repeats.
ReplyDeleteIf I change the direction to 36 Down, the middle five white squares change to blue. But this blue is distinctly different from the blue in the squared ring. And as I move the cursor to each one of these now blue squares, it changes to yellow. Wow.
This now-one-color-now-another and "Where's my cursor?" continues throughout the entire squared rings section. I lost count of the different colors and would need an extensive COLOR WHEEL to name them all. To say it was off-putting would be an understatement. My hat's off to those who were able to navigate through this maze. For me it was an early "Um, bye".
Echo chamber here: admirable construction, easy to solve - except for nightmare city in the colored areas in the app.
ReplyDelete@Rex - thanks for explaining NONS. I totally feel for Negative Nancy.
@Lewis - thank you for DENIAL RIVER!
—Carola
That took some doing. Enjoyable but kinda tough seeing which squares needed attention with the colors. Worth the effort (probably), but on line-by-line review it's awfully gunky and has way too many oofs.
ReplyDeleteI saw multi-piece furniture and in my head I went to IKEA and became obsessed with kits. I kept wondering what an OTTOMAN kit would look like. Took forever to realize it was SETS.
Propers: 16
Places: 3
Products: 8
Partials: 15
Foreignisms: 10
--
Gary's Grid Gunk Gauge: 52 (36%)
Recipes: 3 (beta)
Funnyisms: 4 😕
Tee-Hee: BRA. G-SPOT.
Uniclues:
1 Frodo's tool for redecorating Bilbo's pad.
2 Price to put your feet up.
3 Distribute devilish dodo.
4 Notice: Y'alls pizza down h'yar is divisive.
1 RING BEARER COLOR WHEEL
2 OTTOMAN SETS DOLLAR SIGNS
3 PRINT MAGIC ROBIN
4 BAYOU OLIVE ALERT
My Fascinating Crossword Uniclue Keepsake from Last Year: "Sit in a recliner and do a puzzle," and, "Offer your opinion of an opinion on Blogger" among others. GREAT ONE CREDOS.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
OK here's the NEGEV NEGEB thing from an Israeli. Negev in Hebrew is spelled Nun-Gimel-Bet (the vowels are usually understood, although in literary texts and kids' books they appear under the letters) and so reading from right to left this is how the word looks in a vowelled text:
ReplyDeleteנֶגֶב
The three little dots arranged twice like inverted triangles under the first two letter (Nun and Gimel) give the sound "e" as in "egg."
The last (leftmost) letter is the "Bet" (the 2nd letter of the Hebrew alphabet corresponding to the Greek "beta" and the English "b").
However, and here's the rub, when the "Bet" occurs at the end of the word (and in quite a lot of other circumstances) it is sounded not as a "b" but as a "v". Thus any unvowelled book or newspaper would simply write
נגב
In vowelled texts, the accented "b" sound of the "Bet" is indicated by a dot in the middle of the "Bet" (absent, like the vowels, in ordinary texts such as newspapers, etc., you just get used to reading without the vowels and the accents). Thus the classic three-letter word for a house ("bayit") (probably the source of the shape of the letter "Bet" by the way), looks like this (Bet-Yod-Tav):
בַּיִת
The vowelling has a little line under the "Bet" (the vowel sounds more or less like "u" in "hut") and a dot under the "Yod" that sounds like the "i" in "pin."
But if you look carefully at the "Bet" of "bayit" you'll make out the dot inside it that tells to pronounce it "b" (accented) and not "v" (unaccented).
Again in an ordinary text, the word is unvowelled and looks like this
בית
As you can now see, the "Bet" in "Negev" and the "Bet" in "bayit" look just the same in unvowelled texts.
I'm not a linguist, but I note that academicians (typically confusingly) like to keep the accentuated "bet" when they transliterate to English and so "Negev" come out "Negeb" in academic writing, and that's why it occasionally appears thus in NYT crosswords But "Negev" it is in all spoken Hebrew; if you asked for a bus to the "Negeb" I don't think they'll know what you're talking about.
One of my male Rexblog pals mentioned that he perceived the squares that I saw as orange to be red, but that his wife, like me, also saw them as orange. I thought I remembered from reading it somewhere long ago that men are MUCH more prone to color blindness than women. So I looked it up just now -- and it's true. There's a BIG difference between the sexes. Here's what I found:
ReplyDelete"Color blindness is more commonly expressed in men than in women. Nearly 1 in 12 men experience color blindness, while only 1 in 200 women experience colorblindness. This is a drastic gap between genders concerning color vision, and the reasoning behind it is genetics." Sep 21, 2020
I don't have a NYT subscription, I actually had to do the puzzle colorless (Anonymous @6:44) and it was still easy. I jumped to the bottom of the grid after getting RINGBEARER, and I actually had to work a bit for OLYMPIC FLAG since 1) without color, I didn't notice the five rings right away, and 2) I actually wasn't expecting an Olympics-themed puzzle but I really should have, everyone did it this week (LAT today, WSJ on Thursday, Universal on Friday).
ReplyDeleteThe first theme answers I got were HOUSE (which I just shrugged at, not knowing that GREEN was missing) and CARDS which makes sense even without YELLOW. With (YELLOW)STONE, I saw what was going on and managed to finish in Easy time. Not as fast as July 14th (the palindrome theme), but only slightly slower, which says something about how easy it must've been for those who had the OLYMPIC FLAG shown to them from the get-go. I only had a bit of trouble around 73A where I saw through the "round" trick but blitzed out PREGAME from PR___M_.
Me: Wow, that was a fun and clever puzzle and I found it not too bad! Took me about 20 minutes, let's see what Rex has to say!
ReplyDelete*reads Rex's comments about it being ultra easy and fit for a chid's placemat, maybe easiest Sunday ever constructed*
Well screw me, I guess I'm just a moron.
Worst sloppiest puzzle yet!
ReplyDeleteThis is Chuck to remind bill to shut up.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely horrible solving experience. Couldn’t read the clues, the numbers or follow the progression with the colors. As someone above said, NYT just because you can doesn’t mean you should.
ReplyDeleteFirst time I've walked away from a Sunday puzzle. And my better half did as well.
NYT - ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION TO YOUR SUBSCRIBERS?! Evidently not. Stop with the gimmicks! Especially something like this that takes over the entire real estate!
Overall, I liked the puzzle. I always work the NYT crossword on paper so the colors showed well, except for the black/gray ones, and maybe the orange vs red ones.
ReplyDeleteThe thing I was most appreciative for was that the puzzle didn't dwell on various names of the different Olympic sports!! That can be very annoying sometimes, especially if we have to associate the names of the athletes to them.
Once I figured out "Blue Bayou", things went pretty quick!!
In school 60 years ago I learned the significance of the colors, green for the forests of Europe and blue for Australia and Oceania. The rest is obvious, and totally stupid
ReplyDeleteI’m old school I guess, I print the puzzle, so I never saw the colored squares, they were all just gray when printed from the website, I agree it was fairly easy anyway but I was thinking some of the answers were missing parts. On the other hand, I’ve often heard ‘(blue)print’ shortened to ‘print’ and I thought (black)sheep could also refer to (lost) sheep. ‘Salsa’ ,‘cards’, and ‘alert’ made sense without a color. I was pretty sure the Linda Rondstat hit was ‘Blue Bayou’ but not a big enough fan to be certain of the title.
ReplyDeleteAlso I don’t pay attention to the Olympics, so I couldn’t tell you what order the colored rings are in.
Totally agree that if I’d seen the colors it would’ve bedn too easy for a Sunday, but without them it was only a bit easier than normal.
To let means to rent.
ReplyDeleteAfter the themeless challenges of Friday and Saturday, a fun puff piece is welcome. The timing for us in Syndiland is not the opening, but the closing of the 2024 Olympiad, highlighted by Team USA's thrilling 67-66 victory over host France for women's basketball gold. WTG, ladies! You are all co-DODs here!
ReplyDeleteKudos to PP for this densely themed--and pretty!--puzzle. Easy to solve; most likely much harder to construct. A bit more resistance would've made this an eagle; birdie for sure.
Wordle bogey.
ANITA AND RITA SIN
ReplyDelete“I’MHUNGRY, CANT WAIT,
AND CAN WE ADVANCE?”
“YES, RUN, TAKETHEBAIT,
TIME FOR CANs over CANTS.”
--- ALICE NOLAN
Hard to get the color deal in B&W, and gray. Thanks for (BLUE)BAYOU.
ReplyDeleteWordle par.
In syndiland here, I was given the rings all in grey. I thought part of the puzzle was to recall the location of the various colored rings. @rex on 81A — black onion was a consideration for you?!?
ReplyDeleteThis is a very rare case where I found the puzzle actually improved in syndication because it couldn't be fully reproduced. At least on the Seattle Times site, they couldn't show the colors, so the color-themed answers were simply shaded. It was left to the solver to figure out that the shade represented colors and what colors they were. Made the solve more challenging and the revealer much more interesting--oh, they're not just answers preceded by colors, they're colored RINGS! Nice!
ReplyDeleteThe CCR clue made everything fall into place.
ReplyDeleteFor those unhappy app solvers maybe go out
and purchase the Sunday paper ?
And Rex - connect the colors with circles, not
squares ! Olympic Boxes is an oxymoron. Excellent
Sunday puzzle IMHO !