Sunday, March 20, 2022

Word from the French for "high wood" / SUN 3-20-2022 / It lands on the White House's South Lawn / So-called "Father of Liberalism" / Academic journal with a "Breakthrough of the Year" award / Journalist who was the first woman to guest-host "Jeopardy!"

Constructor: Brad Wiegmann

Relative difficulty: medium (eight minutes here)



THEME: Exs and Nos — a series of bad puns involving dating various people (also, why are all these clues needlessly gendered? Just ๐Ÿ‘ use ๐Ÿ‘ the ๐Ÿ‘ singular ๐Ÿ‘ they ๐Ÿ‘ here ๐Ÿ‘ ffs.)

Theme answers:
  • HAD NO PRAYER ["It's tough finding the right person. My first boyfriend was a perfectly nice atheist, but he ..."]
  • DIDN'T WORK OUT ["So then I dated a fun couch potato, but he ..."]
  • CAME TO NOTHING ["Then my friend set me up with a recluse, but he ..."]
  • LET ME DOWN ["I dated my rock climbing instructor for a while, but he just ..."]
  • WOULD NEVER FLY ["Then I had a fling with a Pittsburgh Penguin, but I knew he ..."]
  • MISSED THE CUT ["I was in a serious relationship with a hippie, but he ..."]
  • DID THE TRICK ["Finally, I started seeing a charming magician, and he ..."]
Word of the Day: JELLO SHOT (Hard stuff that jiggles) —
A Jell-O shot, colloquially known as a jello shot, is a gelatin and alcohol mixture consumed as a shot. The shot is commonly made with vodka or other hard liqours, and is commonly associated with spring break. Shots made with non-branded or unflavored gelatin are sometimes known as jelly shots or gelatin shots.
... 
Modern jello shots originated in the 1950s when Jell-O was at the height of its popularity in the United States. Multiple sources attribute the creation of the modern jello shot to American satirist and musician Tom Lehrer, who claimed to have invented the jello shot as a way to circumvent a ban on alcohol at a navy base he was stationed at. According to Lehrer, he and a friend were barred from bringing alcoholic beverages to a Christmas party at a naval base, and so the two mixed orange Jell-O with vodka in cups so that the mixture could be smuggled into the party.
• • •
No...just, no. I imagine people's reactions to this will center on whether they found these clues charming, and this just did not hit the spot at all for me, so this was a slog of an eight minute solve (really, more like twenty, I had to pause the puzzle and walk away in the middle of it to compose myself, and if I didn't have to blog this, I would not have finished; life's too short to spend solving puzzles you don't enjoy, and I 100% give you permission to leave puzzles unfinished if they don't spark joy). 

Anyway, other than the series of dates here, there's no real tightness to this set—you can pick a profession and find a way to make a pun out of it. Hell, you could have just as easily dumped that charming magician, because it WASN'T IN THE CARDS, or said yes to the Penguin because they were #BAEGOALS, or...you get the picture. There's nothing tying these together other than the bad puns, which mostly just feel like long partial phrases in the grid and (more often than not) aren't funny to me. YMMV here, but with so many potential ways of making theme entries, I would've liked to see something tighter here, or at least funnier ones, rather than "yup, these fit symmetrically". But as it is, it's a lot of squares to fill in, and very little compelling reason to actually do so today.

elle king's "ex's & oh's" is such a banger (and the video ain't bad either)

At least the clues were (outside of the theme entries) more entertaining today than yesterday, for a variety of reasons; a sample of the ones I liked below:
  • TONGUE [One getting depressed during exams?] — as in getting pushed down, and not like the depression caused by *gestures vaguely around at everything going on*
  • MIN [The 1 in {1,2,3}: Abbr.] — yay for math!
  • LATS [They're found near traps] — I had a few different things here at first (raise your hand if you, too, had RATS for the longest time) but nope, we're talking about muscles
  • DUEL [Conflict taking a couple of seconds?] — as in the people that are the seconds for the people who are shooting at each other; also, obligatory comment about how "Hamilton" is overrated (which is not to say that it's bad! just overrated!)
  • ABACUS [You can't say it doesn't count] — yay for more math!
  • GENESIS [Book with a notable world premiere?] — "In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move."
Also some good long fill here, especially in the downs (LIKE HELL IT IS, MARINE ONE, TITLE BOUT, JELLO SHOT, ALL-STAR BREAK) but not enough to overcome the shortcomings of the theme. Anyway, Rex will be back tomorrow, and hopefully there will be a good puzzle waiting for him.

Olio:
  • ULAN (___ Bator, Mongolia) — No. This word should not be in the puzzle, nor in your wordlists if you're a constructor; the preferred / correct Anglicization is Ulaanbataar, one word, stop using the other spelling.
  • ETS (Superman and others, for short) — Also no. IMO there is only one ET (the title character of said movie) and the only valid cluing angles are the lawful good / lawful neutral ones from this chart.
  • DNA (Crispr material Also also no; CRISPR should be in all caps, regardless of what your house style guide says.
  • IRL (Happening offline, to a texter) — Surprised (but very pleased) to see this in the puzzle (and apparently this is the second time it's been in the Times) given Will's general aversion to modern slang (especially acronyms and initialisms); it stands for "in real life".
  • ORSON BEAN (Actor/comedian who was a regular on Johnny Carson's "Tonight Show") — glad to see we're continuing yesterday's trend of old-timey white dudes filling in nine-letter entries in the downs </sarcasm>.
  • PET (Something that all but three U.S. presidents have had while in office— specifically, James Knox Polk and two people who were impeached three times in total...so, uh, overall a pretty bad group of people to (implicitly) namecheck here. 
  • OSHA (Org. issuing vaccine standards starting in 2021— if you aren't already, get vaxxed, get boosted, full stop, no argument.
Yours in puzzling, Christopher Adams, Court Jester of CrossWorld

[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]


146 comments:

  1. Is it just me (clearly it is not Christopher Adams) or are the Sunday puzzles getting more interesting and more challenging of late?

    I found this one to be fun (if a bit corny) and less "fill-in-the-blank-ish" than so many Sunday puzzles.

    Thanks, Brad!

    ReplyDelete
  2. How do you know what each of the hypothetical dates preferred pronouns are?
    Each participant in a duel has a second, a person whose duty is, I would guess, to kill their persons opponent in the case they cheat.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Terrific! The write-up, I mean. The puzzle was tedious but Chris' observations were hilarious.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous12:58 AM

    So all the presumptive dates should be called "they"?
    Very anglo-centric of you to assume all are native English speakers. How about "sie" or "ils"? I realize it's an English-language puzzle, but that doesn't mean only English speakers should be included. Very narrow-minded of you.

    No, wait, you have to choose between "ils" and "elles". The only good solution here is to not refer to people at all in the xword.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Christopher, in a pleasant change from yesterday, I quite enjoyed your writeup. You had a bunch of criticisms of the puzzle, and expressed them quite wittily. (A bit grumpily, but in Rexworld, grumpy comes with the territory.) Aside from the wanting to walk away urge, I agree with almost everything you said: math, ULAN, ETS, CRISPR-in-caps-style-guide-be-damned, and of course get vaxxed all you Covidiots.

    I thought the theme was okay. Brad has some kinda funny notes on xwordinfo.com where he interviews himself. I like that the last date worked out.

    Re the rock climbing instructor: there is a great Provincial Park near me, Skaha Bluffs, which is a rock climbing mecca. Also fun hiking trails for the non-climbers (me!). I spent many hours watching the climbers, with their safety ropes, and they never fell. Until the day one did! His wife/girlfriend was rope tending (or whatever they call it), and do you know what she did when he fell? She laughed... he fell about six feet and was left hanging in space. Then she LET HIM DOWN. Yay for safety.

    [Spelling Bee: Sat 6:20 to pg, then QB later.
    Octordle: What a hoot! I promised not to post my results again but here is (spoiler alert!) a screen shot of my Sat.]

    ReplyDelete
  6. Liked this more than our host, but still awfully tepid. The NYTX is just too middle of the road to do humor well. Although LIKE HELL IT IS gives me hope that the NYTX has loosened its tie a wee little bit. What’s the over/under line on complaints about HELL today? Three? Four?

    @Pete - I couldn’t help but notice that the male constructor wrote clues about his ex-boyfriends. So is it that the constructor and editor are sexist and can’t conceive of a woman in all these jobs? Or that they were afraid that making the exes women would risk doing something deeply offensive? Or that we’re just to imagine it’s a woman writing the clues in honor of Women’s History Month?
    At any rate, I’m with you and clapping hands for emphasis when saying something irrelevant is not recommended.

    ULAaNbaatar may be preferred, but there is no such thing as a “correct” Anglicization. There may be “wrong” ones, and sometimes what was preferred once is wrong now. But “correct?” Prescriptivist nonsense, especially when trying to represent a language in a different alphabet.

    As for Crispr v CRISPR - Radar or RADAR Lasik or LASIK Nato or NATO Ohsa or OHSA - and why not R.A.D.A.R. and N.A.T.O. - Oh look, absolutely no consistency on when an acronym is so in the language that we stop capitalizing and periodizing the abbreviation and just accept it as its own word. That’s why gof invented style guides. Do whatever the ruling style guide tells you to do.

    @JC66 - After the The River controversy yesterday I too was amused by the three THEs in today’s puzzle. De gustibus and all that, but THE MAGI is far worse to me than any “The River.”

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous2:35 AM

    Wow, what a hot take--I mean that Elle /King song was awful. Told my parents to turn the radio off whenever that came on as a kid.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous2:40 AM

    Wait, what was wrong with pres johnson?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Easy-medium. I got slightly bogged down in the SPINEL area but the rest went pretty smoothly. I actually found the “bad” puns amusing. Liked it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I thought the hippy missed the pot, but what do I know? A bit too much guesswork in the PPP areas...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Grayjing4:59 AM

    In 2022, when hip-hop is the most popular genre of music, identifying Dr. Dre as being of RAP instead of NWA is oddly exotifying and points out the NYTXW's overwhelming bent toward old (not even middle-aged anymore) whiteness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As an old white guy, even I was hoping that nwa was the answer.

      Delete

  12. Smooth and easy, with no overwrites other than typos. Didn't know that camphor was a KETONE. Agree with @Ken Freeland that the hippie could have missed a lot of things. I'm assuming the "CUT" in the answer refers to a haircut?

    Liked the puzzle a lot more than @Chris did.

    FYI, tomorrow's Wall Street Journal puzzle is a debut from Sam Buttrey. He's the Steve Martin doppelgรคnger who won the Jeopardy Professors' Tournament last year. Sam is my nephew.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Folks, why all the heteronormal assumptions about the closing? NYT published a puzzle wherein a male constructor offered clues related to HIS ex-boyfriend. Seems a notable occurrence to me.

    Also, the Times does use "they" upon request from the individual being quoted.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Well, HUMIDOR describes Brad well, one whose id is wrapped in humor. Three NYT puzzles so far, all Sundays, all accompanied by very funny interview-formatted constructor notes(In XwordInfo and WordPlay), and all with funny wordplay clues. Today:

    [Conflict taking a couple of seconds?] for DUEL
    [Book with a notable world premiere?] for GENESIS
    [One getting depressed during exams?] for TONGUE
    (Hi, @Christopher!)

    Not to mention the funny theme with the happy ending. It is a good time in the world for humor, bringing balm to the heart. This on top of a solve involving some satisfying work, and little details I liked, such as that PEP up, EASE down, DUEL/DUEL and wannabe MEWL, and PET/PEP/PEN in the northern region.

    You left me feeling good all over, Brad. Thank you greatly, and come do it again soon, please!

    ReplyDelete
  15. It was fine. The themers were fine. The fill was fine. Some clues were very good. The whole effect was, well, fine.

    But the review was terrific!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous7:14 AM

    Conflict taking a couple of seconds? clue works literally as well. The conflict in a duel does take just a couple of seconds.

    ReplyDelete
  17. OffTheGrid7:18 AM

    Much better than yesterday's and the theme was quite entertaining. I'm glad it took me a lot, lot, lot longer than 8 minutes.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Tom T7:23 AM

    SPINEL was new to me.

    Had some cleaning up to do in the south: hEEL/PEEL, Moan/MEWL, SiT/SET.

    I tried going out with a few crossword puzzle instructors but they didn't have a clue.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Cute puzzle!

    When I first saw "Yay for math!" in the commentary, I wondered if this was Rex writing. And also enjoying CRISPR and the journal SCIENCE. Then I saw the byline. Made sense.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Cute theme - maybe not deep enough to carry an oversized grid. Looks to me like the exes were specifically gendered - no issue there. The central LET ME DOWN summarized the story.

    Some oddball fill here and there - but mostly solid. Liked WHITE LIE, BULLPEN and ALL STAR BREAK. I’ve never seen Cars so backed into that and ARLO.

    I’ll have the gua BAO at Momofuku - they’re near perfect.

    Or to straighten out your life through the sincere testimony in the songs of The Revelaires - A MUST

    Enjoyable Sunday solve.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Thx Brad, just the way a Sun. puz should be; tough, but fairly crossed! :)

    Med++

    Very slow going, but no major hitches; just took lots of clear thinking.

    Started on the wrong foot with 'bloc' before CAMP, then had 'pencil' before TONGUE.

    Recall having STILL vs 'sparkling' recently, so that was a gift. Also knew Sebastian COE from back in the day (being a track fan).

    Son was so cute in his OSHKOSH B'Gosh overalls.

    Fun workout; liked it very much! :)

    @okanaganer ๐Ÿ‘ for 0 yd & exc Octordle.!
    ___
    yd pg: 20:47 / W: 3*

    Peace ๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ~ Compassion ~ Tolerance ~ Kindness to all ๐Ÿ•Š

    ReplyDelete
  22. I like a good pun. (Is that an oxymoron?) Of course "good" is entirely subjective, so when I say these themers didn't actually send me...so what? I appreciate the effort, and the fact that each themer had to be figured out separately. No writing rote rot.

    Where I think this grid shines is the fill. I've said this before about this constructor. He's had 3 puzzles in the NYT and they're all Sundays.
    I hope he tries doing some themeless - I bet they'd be smashers!

    Some of the cluing here is fresh and clever (you know which ones I mean. Hi, @Lewis!)

    Of course, there are the inevitable rough spots: THE MAGI (just weird with the THE) and I understand ULAN criticism, but have to admit it didn't bother me - for two reasons:
    (1) It's been around (in crosswords) for ages, and (2) ignorance. My specialty.

    Overall, it all averages out to just "O.K." for me.

    ๐Ÿง ๐Ÿง .75
    ๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰.5

    ReplyDelete
  23. I tried, waited a bit, and tried some more - I just could not get dialed in to this puzzle’s wavelength. There is just too much that was completely WoE to me. I can’t remember having multiple occurrences in a single puzzle where I filled in all the crosses and was convinced I had made a mistake - what the heck is a HUSSAR ? Then I got EPAULET (?) . . . I kept wandering around the grid and met up with SPINEL and METIER ! ! ! As if I wasn’t completely flustered by then, I bumped into ALOAOE - which if nothing else certainly looks like an auto-incorrect made it into the grid by accident. Yuk !

    So finding myself dazed and confused, I started questioning my answers - jokers are “CARDS”, jerks are “TOOLS” - seems plausible, but who knows at this point. I can barely remember what a KETONE is, and a SNO-cat seems like a plausible name for a snow mobile or something similar . . . And of course the theme entries became just an afterthought.

    So after a series of modestly successful Sundays in 2022, including a couple of unassisted finishes, this one left me humbled and pretty much shell-shocked (in the cruciverbalist sense).

    ReplyDelete
  24. Brian8:19 AM

    "Missed the cut" as it relates to hippie is really weak. Agree with Rex; this was unpleasant from start to finish.

    ReplyDelete
  25. This was a sort of guilty pleasure. Most fill in the blanks story puzzles elicit groans. For some reason, I've always leaned into them. Top notch fun today. Happy Spring, everyone.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Anonymous8:57 AM

    "In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move." Oh, when I saw this I just cracked up. So witty; so unexpected. Hilarious and yet, at the same time, so, so....penetrating; so profound. After my initial mirth had subsided, I pondered the existential beauty of this insight, the very nullity of existence for a while and then contemplated, well, I won't say what I contemplated. But rarely have I been so moved by a crossword; well, by a crossword commenter really. Far out.
    Signed: Old-timey White Dude, Ulan Bator, Mongolia

    ReplyDelete
  27. Any puzzle with my hometown in it makes the cut.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Anonymous9:06 AM

    Puzzle was meh, but the write-up is truly awful. Hissy fits over language inclusivity, owing to a baseless assumption of heteronormativity, humble-bragging about your eight-minute finish, whine, whine, whine. I see that some commentators find this funny, but for me it’s insufferable. Christopher, you seriously need to lighten up.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Have we gone back in time fifty years? That hippie clue sure made me feel like it.

    Very choppy solve for me today. Most of the long answers needed a few crosses, so I was hacking away at a bunch of 3-, 4- and 5-letter words.

    There used to be a restaurant in London called The Gay Hussar … Hungarian food. They had a chilled wild cherry soup that was one of my five favorite dishes of all time.

    ReplyDelete
  30. "The Trouble with Hippies," as Bart Simpson read in a Mad Magazine article in an episode I watched last night, is that "They're always stepping on each others' toes." And then he does the "Mwah-huh" laugh.

    On the very first outing with my future wife, back in the olden days, she said she didn't like hippies. What the heck? Well, fun while it lasted, but our relationship HAD NO PRAYER. Then I looked at myself and saw I was in a yuppie bar in a decent suit and tie after work at a yuppie job (these were the yuppie days). I was wearing shoes and socks.

    As it turned out, I didn't like yuppies. So in the chemical sense, our equation balanced. And here we are, it has lasted, and all the JUMBLES of shedded snakeskins you could use to describe a life would make a pretty good collection of hiking boots.

    ReplyDelete
  31. spyGuy9:16 AM

    DNA left in your CRISPR will likely start ROTTING. Now THAT'S a corny line!

    Also, I am in no way a cigar guy, but why would your HUMIDOR be smoke-filled? I thought that's where you kept your cigars for storage. Are some large enough that you smoke them in there too? For an aficionado, wouldn't smoking in there taint the flavor of the other cigars? Or, was the puzzle being cute and filled with "smoke"s, as in cigars to use? I didn't like that one really. Plus, two cigar-centric answers? That was balanced for me with the three science ones, KETONE, DNA, and BEAKER. Not a pleasant solve, but not terrible.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Even though Sharp indicated he would be on vacation over a week, I really thought he wrote the write-up. Seemed to me very similar to his style. For better or worse. Others (see Brian at 8:19 AM) also seem to have been fooled (and seemed to have stopped reading the write up before the identification of the author). Hopefully no offense, Brian.

    I don't relate the clues to the sexual preference of the constructor, so that whole thing went over my head. All the better. In my world, crossword puzzles are something to get you away from the ubiquitous necessity of cramming a point of view into everything you do.

    So I kind of enjoyed the puzzle. Thought the themed clues were not hilarious, but enjoyed them anyway.

    Used to work for OSHA, not Osha. (My spell check thinks only the first way is correct.) Never thought about that. Wonder what Safire would have thought. (Skew me old.)

    ReplyDelete
  33. @Grayjing - Uh, there is almost unending proof that the NYTX skews old, white, and male. However, using one of the artists most identified with Gangsta RAP as a cross reference for RAP only shows that the NYTX skews old and male and is not in any way exotifying. Not that we won’t get exotifying comments about Dr DRE and RAP in these comments, but let’s be more precise about when it is actually happening. The NYTX will probably give you a chance sometime this week.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Anonymous9:43 AM

    Anyone wish to hazard a guess as to the breakdown by the thing we casually refer to as 'race' (i.e. 'white', 'black', 'Asian', 'Hispanic', other) and by age, of the people who regularly complete (or attempt to complete) the NY Times Sunday crossword?

    Here's my stab: White 70%, Black 4%, Asian 12%, Hispanic 14%.
    Under 30: 15%
    31-60: 35%
    60+: 50%

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are only 3 races:
      European(white)
      Asian
      Sub Saharan Africa (Black)

      Hispanic is not a race.
      They are a combination of all 3 including indigenous (Native American)

      Delete
  35. Super boring; took me almost double my normal time because I'm not a sports person and so ALLSTARBREAK and TITLEBOUT really shut me out.

    I'm pretty surprised that a theme set this incohesive got accepted. And, fill was uuuugggghhhh. EPAULET, SPINEL, ORSONBEAN crossing ARLO and SAHL really made for a slog.

    ReplyDelete
  36. I found this more amusing than Christopher Adams did. By solving randomly, it took a while to get enough crosses to see the first theme answer filled in, which actually was the last theme answer, DID THE TRICK. That answer told me we were getting a little story and I found that pleasing.

    I finished in the NW - the L of MODEL T made a DOOK and it took me a moment to see BULL PEN. Earlier in the solve, I had "canapes" for "Non-starters?" and was happy to have sussed that tricky clue out. BULLPEN is the better answer.

    I don't really get 104A, not being able to relate MISSED THE CUT to a hippie unless we're talking about long hair? Um, not funny. On the other hand, I loved the Pittsburgh Penguin who WOULD NEVER FLY.

    GENESIS, 56A, great clue!

    Thanks, Brad Wiegmann, this was a fun and chewy Sunday.

    ReplyDelete
  37. @Anon8:57 - Two things, Poe’s Law and Douglas Adams.

    @Birchbark - all the JUMBLES of shedded snakeskins you could use to describe a life would make a pretty good collection of hiking boots. ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿฝ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿฝ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿฝ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿฝ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿฝ

    @spyGuy - Cigars and cigarettes are sometimes referred to as “smokes” - an example of metonymy.

    @pmdm - Never seen Osha, and still see NASA more than Nasa. I wouldn’t be the least surprised to see some style guide to direct acronyms not capitalize all letter except for government agencies. Crispr is an unusual case in that it is so close to a different word that it looks like a typo, so CRISPR adds clarity. Interestingly, my autocorrupt only flags Crispr as “wrong,” and has no problem with Osha.

    @Anon9:43 - No, I wouldn’t want to hazard a guess.

    ReplyDelete
  38. "BAEGOALS". Hah,hah,hah, I get it. And internet abbreviations we can all guess at. Yes !
















    "A must,use on,tied on,https,muds..." Good Grief. new = full ?

    "BAEGOALS". Hah,hah,hah, I get it. And internet abbreviations we can all guess at. Yes ! Thanks, Christopher, for explaining the only one I knew.

    Don't let the door ...












    ReplyDelete
  39. Anonymous10:20 AM

    Hmm. The "in the beginning" remark in the review is in quotes, which is appropriate, as it comes from the Douglas Adams "Hitchhiker" book.

    The reviewer's last name is also Adams. It's a common surname, but I wonder if there's any connection.

    Also, I wonder if recognizing a quote from "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" is an old white man thing.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Moksha10:22 AM

    Will someone please retire Apps as ‘Starters, for short’. I’ve seen it multiple times in the past several weeks, and it’s way past its freshness date.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Whoops. Sorry about the paste and cut screwup. I'm old (among other things).

    Oh,and I forgot "the magi".

    ReplyDelete
  42. PaulyD10:38 AM

    @zed - Thank you. Thought I was the only one here who recognized the quote from The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Sadly for us, Christopher Adams is no Douglas Adams.

    The disdain in these writeups (whether from "Rex" or his friends), as well as many of the commenters, has become tiresome. It reminds me of the old joke:

    Q. Why are disputes between academics so vicious?

    A. Because the stakes are so small.

    Going forward, I'll gladly take the proffered advice from today's blog and stop reading when it's clear we're just being subjected to another rant from another wannabe embittered her/his/their/its tendentious worldview isn't appropriately reflected in a freaking crossword puzzle.

    Get a real life.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Hey All !
    Reviewer Christopher...
    Lots of No in your write-up. Dang, sensitive much? The stuff you didn't like, others did. So take your Nos and ooze back to your hole.

    *Ahem*
    That DRIB bashing aside, my take (we all have opinions, and you know the saying associated with ANOs ๐Ÿ˜) was a funny, TONGUE-in-cheek puz. Liked the corniness.

    MISSED THE CUT, maybe a better clue could be "I was in a serious relationship with an incompetent surgeon, but he..." Yea? Nay?

    Had a slow solve today. Was stuck in each section by easy stuff. Kind of like missing easy words in SB. The declining of the brain hath begun. That would be a good book title. ๐Ÿ˜

    Stuck on OBEDIENT until the end. Last word in. Had O__DI_NT, and nothing happening with word recognition. Didn't help I had wIN in for MIN, giving me 29D as D_wONS. Actually wanted to change AMENDING to something else, as wanted OBEYsomething. Had thought for a bit OH I DIDNT. Har. Or DIDST. Finally erased the w, took DRIB on faith, and eventually saw OBEDIENT, and... Happy Music! Dang. And if that made absolutely no sense to you, welcome to the declining of the ole brain. Fun.

    Triple ING in the North Center area, with AMENDING, ROTTING, CAME TO NOTHING. Wanted BUll for BUNK until BULLPEN showed up. inuiTS-ALueTS-ALEUTS. Neat clue for JELLO SHOT. Wanted HAH or HAR for HEH. Had cOULD NEVER FLY at first, which cOULD fit the clue.

    Let me apologize for being a PALLOKA earlier in my post. That apology is for the commentariat, not Chris. HEH.

    yd -4, should'ves 1

    One F
    RooMonster
    DarrinV

    ReplyDelete
  44. @Anonymous 943am "All solvers matter."

    ReplyDelete
  45. Anonymous10:59 AM

    Question for the group:
    Is Mr.Adams smugness or his bizarre use of semicolons more annoying?

    Chris,
    Thanks for obviating style guides. When will we have access to yours?

    ReplyDelete
  46. Hee, Haw, Har, Hah, Heh
    Why must they do this to me?
    Damn them, naticks all

    ReplyDelete
  47. I approached this puzzle like a gold miner but it didn't pan out.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Anonymous11:06 AM

    What do you mean "needlessly gendered"? Why is it "needless"? What does it matter if they're gendered or not?

    ReplyDelete
  49. @TJS (10:04, 10:24) -- There was a kind of poetry in it. I imagined and acoustic base, improv trumpet, and brushed snare drum in the background.

    ReplyDelete
  50. The Joker11:14 AM

    I dated an out of work actor a few times but he couldn't perform.

    ReplyDelete
  51. On a plane headed for Tulum, where will be staying in a TEN HUT resort. Sorry, I’m trying to make you jealous.

    I enjoyed this cornball of a puzzle.

    One could riff for a while, I suppose, on the term WHITELIE, given the apparent makeup of NYT readers.

    Could a previously unknown sibling, tracked down through DNA testing be referred to as a GENE SIS? I didn’t think so.

    Thanks and ALOHA OE for a fun Sunday, Brad Wiegmann.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Anonymous11:18 AM

    Needless gendering anger at crossword clues (why does the constructor need to gender the way you want?), annoyingly using YMMV and yet being patronizing about the puzzle using IRL, saying Hamilton is overrated clearly just to be cool and contrarian, obnoxiously using the word “olio,” needless virtue signaling by making some random down with old-timey white dudes comment, arrogantly deciding which ETs are allowed on your list, and having to actually walk away from a puzzle to calm down. Someone seems to be taking they-self and life a little too seriously.

    ReplyDelete
  53. You hated it so much you couldn’t reference the clue numbers?

    ReplyDelete
  54. Ay Dios mรญo!...I began salivating for some bodacious authentic mouth watering Chalupas. The smells wafting my way were sumptuous ...but then I saw someone run across the street and grab some Taco HELL and I got served a transformed, ridiculously stuffed Menudo.
    I did enjoy the smell but some of the taste made me groan at first bite; the second bite dribbled down my chin...will I get some meat here? Oh..I did. But I'll be a monkey's tia when it came to trying to figure out why CAMP is a band of supporters. The hit or miss kept being shoved in my mouth.
    Did my mouth water in the end? you ask...Well...I did burn my TONGUE several times. I don't believe Menudo is a cure for a hangover and I want Chalupas delivered to me from Oaxaca.
    I will now switch restaurants because I really did MISS THE CUT....
    TITLE BOUT? que es eso?

    ReplyDelete
  55. OffTheGrid11:25 AM

    If I lived in Crossworld and @Rex asked me to guest-blog, I would decline due to the rudeness and intolerance of the commentariat(not all of it of course).

    ReplyDelete
  56. Anonymous11:28 AM

    Anon 9:43
    There is no such thing as race. Or men or women for that matter. That is until, there’s a grievance. Then all of a sudden, these categories—once only social constructs— are not only organically real, but of the utmost significance.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Beezer11:43 AM

    If this guest blogger of the last two days is the ”Court Jester” of Crossworld, I do NOT want to meet The Executioner! Slightly more balanced today but I’m really ready for @Rex to be back…[@Rex: “Yeah, I’ll show them…they think I can be nasty-ass…]. I will also be happy to get back to minimal internet abbreviations in the review (hi @TJS) and perhaps NO hand clap emojis. Are you 16 years old?

    This was a perfectly serviceable (and enjoyable) Sunday puzzle in my opinion. I WAS a bit surprised to see Orson Bean appear, and don’t get me wrong, I liked the man, I’m just not sure he holds up as a classic pop culture icon (for those of us younger than Boomer) and I’m ready to hear what others might say.

    @Southside, a SNOCAT is what Scatman Crothers drove up the mountain to The Overlook Hotel in The Shining to “rescue” the family. To be distinguished from the much smaller and nimble snowmobiles (they call those snow machines in AK). SNOCATS look like something you’d see at a construction site.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Loads of fun and so much here to like. My favorites among the themers were DIDN'T WORK OUT; LET ME DOWN; and the delightful payoff, DID THE TRICK. Even the weaker themers were fun to figure out, even when they're a bit of a stretch. I'm not sure that the most important trait of hippies, for example, is that they grow their hair or beards long -- but the answer DOES THE TRICK anyway.

    Some great non-themer cluing. TONGUE (45A) is fabulous. Such an interesting way to clue PET (38D). Loved BULLPEN -- I was looking for something like B TEAM or SUBS-something or even ENTREES for "Nonstarters".

    And I've identified another kealoa: ALEUTS/INUITS (49D). Here, I wrote in the "TS" and just waited.

    This is my kind of puzzle and I enjoyed it a lot. I also think the title is inspired.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Joseph Michael12:02 PM

    Who is this picky person who isn’t satisfied with anything? No, I’m not referring to the guest reviewer, but to the fickle date seeker of the theme. Did it ever occur to you that it might not be them but *you* who is the problem? Glad you finally found a magician to keep you amused, but don’t be surprised if one day you become the subject of a disappearing act.

    Liked the theme concept but have to swipe left on at least half of the themers, with MISSED THE CUT being the worst. I know puns are corny but they have to make at least a little sense.

    Favorite and most startling moment: LIKE HELL IT IS. It’s the first time a crossword puzzle has yelled at me.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Anonymous12:06 PM

    Gil
    If you will, please explain the menudo comment. I won’t defend my love of Taco Bell and my exposure to legit Mexican food is limited, but I thought menudo was soup.
    Taco Bell’s chalupas may be inauthentic. Maybe even not so good to some palates. But soup or soupy they’re not.
    Thanks in advance for the straight dope.

    ReplyDelete
  61. @Beezer - When I think of ORSON BEAN I also think of Johnny and Ed in plaid suits with wide ties. More famous people of the era have been forgotten. I’d go further and suggest that even Rowan Atkinson’s Mr. BEAN is dated, now. But what can we expect when 57 year old Dr. DRE, 65 year old Katie COURIC, and 72 year old Richard GERE are the fresh PPP answers.

    ReplyDelete
  62. My hippie MISSEDTHEbUs, stumped by the names at 77D and 77A.
    Unfortunately I also guessed the XW solving option in 4D was a PuN, and didn't know COHIBA, so missed OBOE with the French clue. I'm a bit slow this morning, it seems.

    I liked LIKEHELLITIS and DIDTHETRICK.

    Thanks Christopher, for the tone adjustment.

    ReplyDelete
  63. I found the puzzle quite amusing, likely because I love puns. I called a few of them bad, and my wife said “You just have to imagine Steven Wright saying it.”

    (For those who did not solve this in NY Times print version, in the blurb/write up the constructor specifically states the inspiration came from Steven Wright.)

    We paused our solving (took an ALL STAR BREAK?) to watch a few clips of Steven Wright. Then when we finished solving, my lovely wife took it upon herself to read aloud each theme clue and answer in a droning, vocal-fry-laden impression of Steven Wright. It was adorable and made me love the puzzle even more — though the hippie / “MISSED THE CUT” themer remained unforgivably bad, even when performed my by perfect and flawless wife.

    @Frantic Sloth: “A good pun” is *not* an oxymoron! When it comes to puns there are three variations: “Good good,” “good bad,” and “bad bad.” A “good good” pun is the sort that most people will unironically appreciate. A “good bad” pun is the sort of dad joke that pun aficionados will trade like illicit goods on a black market. And a “bad bad” pun is a toxic stinker that needs to be disposed of, as it can sour relationships and ruin parties.

    @Various Anons today: Who urinated in your corn flakes this morning? This blog is well known to be a progressive/liberal place. Why do you come here if it’s going to put you in a bad mood? I don’t go to Fox News op ed pages and complain about the right wing talking points I see there. Do yourselves (and a good number of us) a favor and just steer clear, please.

    @Christopher Adams: All week long I’ve been missing Rex Parker, mainly because his guest bloggers (though delightful!) most often go far too easy on the puzzle. It was refreshing to get that same Rex Parker vitriol and acidity today — well done.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Anonymous12:37 PM

    I imagine the last two guest bloggers are Rex wannabes.

    ReplyDelete
  65. A singular “they” is poor English. If you dated a Pittsburgh Penguin, you dated a man. This reviewer is as full of self righteous virtue signaling sound and fury as Rex, right to the end.

    ReplyDelete
  66. RichardH12:43 PM

    Was looking forward to some time without the resident curmudgeon. Didn’t know we would get a guest curmudgeon! I quite enjoyed this puzzle and the puns.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Has anyone seen a lonely-looking wavelength? I finished but took a lot longer than 8 minutes! Last letter in was the N of THE ULAN/OLIN cross.

    Wanted HAD NO faith but that DIDN’T WORK OUT. Nor did HAD NO future, which I thought was funny.

    Some nice clues, as Adams pointed out. I also liked the non-sporting clue for GOAT - Pan, in part. And What makes the short list? for ET AL.

    What is KET ONE and how did it get away with crossing MARINE ONE?

    MEW yesterday, MEWL today.

    No mewling here:

    Robert Shaw Festival Singers - O Serene Light from THE All-night Vigil (Vespers), Sergei Rachmaninov, 1873-1943

    Svete tihiy - the “hymn of light” – “an ancient Christian hymn that dates at least to the third century. The hymn originally accompanied the entrance of the clergy and the lighting of the lamp at sunset. The simple four-note motive of the Kievan chant is transmuted into a shimmering musical evocation of the Light Eternal. A solo voice lifts up a song of praise to the Trinity.” - from singersmca.org

    ReplyDelete
  68. Well, "Scintilla" must be "drop". "Not one drop of this will touch my lips."

    Hmm, that's weird. That doesn't work. It's DRIP?! Do people say "drip" instead of scintilla? Well, I guess they do!

    So, with a totally deadly P in what would come to be ObEDIENT, I ended up in an unsolvable NATICK // OLD FOGEY hell involving:

    - ARLO
    - ETES
    - LOEWE
    - ORSON BEAN

    And I could not rescue myself with these, which I couldn't get
    - MIN
    - AMENDING
    - DEMONS

    And I actually yelled in my living room. But even before this train wreck, I really didn't like this puzzle.

    And hey Chris? Your ๐Ÿ‘ sassy ๐Ÿ‘ identity ๐Ÿ‘ politics ๐Ÿ‘clapbacks ๐Ÿ‘ make ๐Ÿ‘ everyone ๐Ÿ‘ our ๐Ÿ‘ age ๐Ÿ‘ look ๐Ÿ‘ imbecilic. ๐Ÿ‘ We ๐Ÿ‘ are ๐Ÿ‘ going ๐Ÿ‘ to ๐Ÿ‘ lose ๐Ÿ‘ the midterms ๐Ÿ‘ because ๐Ÿ‘ of ๐Ÿ‘ you

    ReplyDelete
  69. I remember Orson Bean from his long stint as a regular panelist on the game show "To Tell The Truth." I suspect that that's where most of the people of my age would know him from -- assuming they know him at all. And I'm about to do you all who don't know what I'm talking about a really big favor:

    The big favor I'm doing is introducing you not so much to Orson, but to "To Tell The Truth". This long-running game show that began life in the late-1950s and has been around in decade after decade has probably given me more hours of pleasure than any TV show of all time. And it's all available now on YouTube.

    When the pandemic first hit, this became one of my guilty pleasure escapes. It's not only a superbly entertaining show -- especially for folks like us who enjoy solving puzzles (the show is one big puzzle about who you can believe and who you can't believe) -- but it will take you back to an era that was surely more innocent, less cynical, and (I would argue) in many ways quite a bit happier than the one we inhabit now. It's not at all a bad thing to teleport yourself back to the 1960's -- even if it's only for a half hour at a time. I highly recommend doing it. Nor would I be at all surprised if you were to get hooked -- at least as much as you're hooked on Wordle.

    PS -- Watch the episodes that are in black and white. The later shows that are in color have been dumbed down, alas.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Yet another uproariously hilarious review by the Court Jester of CrossWorld . Why would you have such an obviously biased reviewer fill in for you while you're on vacation? Oh wait. We're talking about Rex here. On the plus side, at least there was no slander involved today.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Favorite comment today: @Joseph Michael, 12:02.

    ReplyDelete
  72. How can someone finish this puzzle in 8 minutes and still have time to be offended by some of the fill? When I'm offended (which generally takes something a little more than a crossword puzzle) I like to savor the moment, work up a little righteous rage ... that takes time!

    ReplyDelete
  73. Anonymous1:32 PM

    Sanfranman,
    I’m guessing Mr.Adams did slander the constructor. It’s just that slander is spoken, all we have here are his written comments. Yesterday’s may have been libelous (written).

    ReplyDelete
  74. Anonymous1:36 PM

    Oceanjeremey,
    Nope. You’re not going to direct my actions.
    But I’m glad you acknowledge the obvious truth that this place is not neutral. Fact is the mods frequently spike my comments which are on the right side of cultural and political questions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is a blog of a *private* *individual.* Why would you expect it to be neutral?

      This is not a public square, a newspaper, a university, or any other venue where anyone is guaranteed free speech (except for the author and owner of the space, which is Rex Parker).

      That’s as ridiculous as if I showed up to a party at your house and got upset when you asked me to stop singing communist anthems and quoting Kropotkin. No one has ever claimed that Rex Parker, or the commenting community, are neutral. And there’s no reason that Rex Parker, or the commenting community, *should* be neutral.

      This is, in fact, exactly how free speech is supposed to work. If you don’t like this space you are welcome to create your own blog.

      Delete
  75. Anonymous1:39 PM

    George,
    Chris’s clapbacks do make your cohort look foolish. But that is not why you are going to lose the midterms.

    ReplyDelete
  76. Anonymous1:42 PM

    Dave,
    There’s no such thing as a singular they. At least not in English. Sure people use it incorrectly all the time. Be glad they do. It immediately marks them as, well, someone who doesn’t understand even something as basic grammar.

    ReplyDelete
  77. old timer1:50 PM

    NO, JUST NO! @Rex, if you ever take another vacation, please don't hire Christopher Adams. The puzzle was pretty OK for a Sunday, but the writeups today and yesterday just made me cringe.

    Yesterday's contained the most inane complaint in blog history. If you want to talk about Italy's longest river, you simply can't put in PO. Everyone knows all entries in a puzzle must contain at least three letters. Well, everyone but Mr Adams, it seems. You pretty much have to say THEPO, unless you opt for PORIVER, which is IMO ugly.

    ReplyDelete
  78. is there anything sadder than an even-more-butt-hurt rex? maybe get a hobby that doesn’t infuriate you. you guys are such snowflakes and virtue signalers. you must be fun at parties.

    ReplyDelete
  79. Harold2:01 PM

    Anon 1:42 First, we've been using the singular they for a thousand years. You went from plural to singular and finally either. And how about the sentence "No matter who called me an asshole, they had no right to do so in a public place"? A perfectly fine use of the singular they. Wait wait, damn, you're right. Everyone does, so it has to be plural.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Surely two white dudes born in the 1920s (ORSON BEAN and SAHL) crossing each other is a NATICK.

    ReplyDelete
  81. @anon (1:32pm) ... My bad. Thanks for correcting me. I always get slander and libel confused. One of these days, maybe it will sink in, but I rather doubt it. I don't use either word all that often and haven't managed to get them straight after nearly 63 years.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Loved demons as possessive types…

    @anon 9:43 Grievance doesn’t spring out of nowhere. It starts with inequity.

    ReplyDelete
  83. Anonymous2:06 PM

    So yesterday, according to the blogger, the NYTimes was at fault for not allowing the personality of the constructor to shine through?

    So today, according to the blogger, the NYTimes was at fault for allowing the personality of the constructor as he pretty much shouted - "Hey, I'm a dude & I date dudes" and should have used a gender neutral pronoun?

    ReplyDelete
  84. @Anony 12:06
    If we had ever sat down and had a conversation that actually makes (coming from me)... you would see that my mind wanders and is often filled with piddling tripe....(Menudo) Most people don't understand my ingredients nor do they care. That's OK...my grammar also sucks and I happen to LOVE Chalupas - but only if THEY are authentic...Make any sense?

    Are we seriously going into the grammar discussion? Please don't. Do you want to see a serial cryer on your hands? I got enough English bashing from my Nana who called me her little heathen...I have scars to prove it. Just ask me the difference between us/we....I think I figured out that chickens lay eggs.

    ReplyDelete
  85. Late to the party as I was providing some music for church this morning, so I have a righteous excuse, at least. And then at the first themer I run into an atheist. Of course. We did a number in my singing group called "The Atheists Ain't' Got No Songs", so at least that was fun to remember.

    Plodded on to the finish, because it's Sunday, and it's what I do on Sunday's, but I really never got a rhythm going. This was like cross-country skiing where you keep hitting bare patches and have to take your skis off. Not really a lot of fun.

    Agree with everyone who found the "hippie" clue hopelessly dated. I haven't heard "Get a haircut" in, well, I can't remember the last time. That long, thank goodness.

    Also, I of course forgot to take my own advice to print out the Large Print edition, and decided to try better reading glasses instead. Mixed success.

    So, a Sunday. OK, BW, but for me no Big Whoop. As Groucho once said, I've had a lovely time, but this wasn't it. Thanks for some fun, at least.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Anonymous2:20 PM

    @Nancy: To Tell the Truth was revived on ABC in 2016 and has been running there since. If you think the 1970s syndicated color episodes were dumbed down, the latest 21st century incarnation makes them look brilliant.

    ReplyDelete
  87. If anyone gets the Minneapolis StarTribune, today they will find a delightful crossword puzzle co-constructed by George Barany and Christopher Adams in the magazine the Strib puts out quarterly.

    ReplyDelete
  88. Anonymous2:29 PM

    Sanfranman,
    Well, now I feel bad. I confess. My comments were actually directed at Mr.Adams.
    Hell, I make mistakes all the time and shouldn’t have called you out. I apologize.
    I like your comments. Don’t care much for Mr.Adams’s.

    Wright-young,
    Sometimes grievances are the result of wrongs. Sometimes not.

    ReplyDelete
  89. Anonymous2:38 PM

    Gill,
    Thanks for the info. Makes perfect sense. I’m gonna make quesadillas tonight. I’m guessing they would horrify you.
    As for English grammar lessons, well, English isn’t your native tongue. It is Chris Adams’s.
    When I suspect I’m speaking ( in English) with a non native English speaker, I absolutely judge them. And the adjudication is a.ways the same: Wow! How amazing that this person can speak a second, or third etc., language so well. It is, invariably, humbling.
    Which brings me back to Mr.Adams. I feel confident after reading him for the past two days that. Mr.Adams could use some humility.

    ReplyDelete
  90. Sharon AK2:59 PM

    @Anon 12:58 Agree.

    I found this puzzle surprisingly difficult. I just wasn't on the wavelength. But a number of the clues were very clever and amusing. And I liked most of the pun/answers.
    But I just don't get the Hippie one and I didn't think the first one really worked.

    ReplyDelete
  91. @Anon 2:20 -- I know that; I saw one or two of those newest episodes and was beyond appalled. They're absolutely the pits. I wonder how ABC got the rights? Goodson and Todman must be turning over in their respective graves. (And they're surely dead by now: after all, I went to school with Mark Goodson's daughter.)

    ReplyDelete
  92. I'm in the same CAMP as @Nancy 11:50: lots of fun, lots to like; I'd just add CAME TO NOTHING to my favorites. I also enjoyed the tricky clues (agree with others about the DEMONS; also GENESIS and TONGUE) and a bunch of the other entries: METIER, WHITE LIE, PSYCHE, PALOOKA, EPAULET, HUSSAR, JUMBLES. Overall, an unusually good Sunday, I thought.

    Do-over: MISSED THE CUe. Help from previous puzzles: LATS as clued. No idea: COHIBA.

    ReplyDelete
  93. @sanfranman (2:04)-- I've just dreamed up a mnemonic, of sorts, to help you remember the difference between slander and libel:

    The S in Slander = the S in "says". Slander is when someone SAYS something defamatory.

    The L in libel = the L in "letters". Libel is when someone WRITES something defamatory about you.

    Hope that helps.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Nancy 3:27 @Sanfran 2:04

      I thought SFM was replying sarcastically to the anon, but my mnemonic has always been, "Slander is spoken, libel is a label."

      My mother graduated from Dalton in 1947, having skipped first grade because she could already read.

      Delete
  94. Such histrionics. "I had to walk away to compose myself." Hahahaha. The clap emoji thing reminds me of Richard Dreyfuss in The Goodbye Girl barking "I Don't. Like. The Panties. Drying. On. The Rod." as he pulled them down one by one. Love your idea of using "they" exclusively – it's like "don't ask, don't tell" 30 years later.

    I think the Recluse themer is pretty funny. The Rock Climbing Instructor and the Hippie are the weakest two – Film Director would have better for MISSED THE CUT, imo. I couldn't figure out if the Hippie didn't go to his appointment at the barbershop, or if he was nostalgic to get his hair cut short. Some old white dude should write a song about it.

    Orson Bean was in "Being John Malkovich", by the way, if that renders him any more palatable. Lots of gender zaniness there.

    ReplyDelete
  95. When should I use the singular “they”?

    "Writers should use the singular “they” in two main cases: (a) when referring to a generic person whose gender is unknown or irrelevant to the context and (b) when referring to a specific, known person who uses “they” as their pronoun.

    When referring to a generic person whose gender is unknown or irrelevant to the context, use the singular “they” as the pronoun. For example, if you use nouns like “person,” “individual,” or “everyone” or phrases like “every teacher” or “each nurse” in a sentence, use the appropriate form of the pronoun “they” as needed." (APA - American Psychological Association

    Singular 'They'

    Though singular 'they' is old, 'they' as a nonbinary pronoun is new—and useful.

    Update: This sense was added in September 2019:

    "One common bugbear of the grammatical stickler is the singular they. For those who haven’t kept up, the complaint is this: the use of they as a gender-neutral pronoun (as in, “Ask each of the students what they want for lunch.”) is ungrammatical because they is a plural pronoun." (M-W)

    "They is taking on a new use, however: as a pronoun of choice for someone who doesn’t identify as either male or female. This is a different use than the traditional singular they, which is used to refer to a person whose gender isn’t known or isn’t important in the context, as in the example above. The new use of they is direct, and it is for a person whose gender is known or knowable, but who does not identify as male or female. If I were introducing a friend who preferred to use the pronoun they, I would say, “This is my friend, Jay. I met them at work.”" ((M-W)

    "In an 1881 letter, Emily Dickinson wrote "Almost anyone under the circumstances would have doubted if [the letter] were theirs, or indeed if they were themself." People have used singular 'they' to describe someone whose gender is unknown for a long time, but the nonbinary use of 'they' is relatively new." (M-W: Words We're Watching)

    If they're still not convinced there's this: A brief history of singular ‘they’ from (public.oed.com).Peace ๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ~ Compassion ~ Tolerance ~ Kindness to all ๐Ÿ•Š

    ReplyDelete
  96. fly on the wall4:21 PM

    I love coming here occasionally to see that Rex's grumpiness has bred a comment section even more vitriolic and hateful than he is. No wonder I've long since stopped making this a daily stop. Bless your hearts.

    ReplyDelete
  97. Anonymous4:39 PM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  98. Anonymous4:42 PM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  99. Got right into the goofiness. Laughed aloud over the recluse (CAME TO NOTHING). Never heard of SPINEL and spent way too much time hellbent on making garNEt work. Didn't get "Take place?" = SET. Setting places at the table? Then why "take"? Or pulling up a chair at your place at the table? Then why SET and not SiT? Had no idea that the SHEKEL is the modern-day currency of Israel. Would have said it was strictly Biblical. Wiki tells me the SHEKEL is divided into 100 agorot -- I hope that word comes soon to a puzzle near me. Except that I'll probably forget it sooner. Was driven crazy by a hidden error at the end. Got so desperate that I was "correcting" what was right. Turned out to be the missing A in my version of eRLo/eMENDING. Oh, well.

    But I really came here to Express my admiration for @Birchbark's 9:10 post, the second and third paragraphs. Brilliant!

    ReplyDelete
  100. This puzzle's theme was awful, but I didn't know until today that Elle King's father is Deuce Bigalow

    ReplyDelete
  101. I can’t decide which is more schadenfreude inducing, stealing from Shakespeare while claiming singular they is poor English, claiming one’s comments are deleted because of one’s politics when everyone knows it has nothing to do with politics, or coming here to insult others for being vitriolic. I can’t decide so here’s a poll.

    Sorry, this is a democratic poll so you can only vote once, which means you’ll have to sign in to google to vote. I promise not to spam you much. ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿคฃ

    ReplyDelete
  102. Just as I don't read Rex, I didn't read Chris Adams yesterday or today until just now*. But the discussions about his unpleasantness both days made me go back and take a look.

    Here's what most annoyed me today:

    "Life's too short to spend solving puzzles you don't enjoy, and I 100% give you permission to leave puzzles unfinished if they don't spark joy."

    Gee, that's mighty generous of you, Chris. Actually, I've been giving myself the exact same permission for... like what, 35-40 years? But it's reassuring to have your permission thrown in for good measure. I'll sleep much better tonight knowing that I have it. The problem is that we obviously don't agree on puzzles at all. This one I loved and I'm thinking that it's quite possible that you might love some of the ones that I dropped like a hot potato. Without a shred of guilt, let me hasten to say.

    *Mostly I don't read any analyses of puzzles by the blogmeisters: not Rex's, not Rex's stand-ins, not Jeff's, not Deb's, not Rachel's, not Caitlin's. And it's not because I don't like the way they write because some of these people are excellent writers. It's because they explain far far more about the puzzle than I need to have explained -- and life is short. I only read them when there's something about that day's puzzle that I don't understand. And once I understand it, I stop reading.

    ReplyDelete
  103. MFCTA: 4:39 and 4:42

    @Barbara, “Take place” I took to mean a movie SET, where any number of “takes” might be required to get just the right scene.

    @GILL, think “I’m in CAMP @Lewis.” I almost used the idiom yesterday but had already written too much. Something like “I joined up with camp iBn, but steered clear of the Tiber clan.”

    @Zed from yesterday - admirable move, with sympathies on having to triple your letter-count. At least we’re still bookends. Also, “let’s be more precise about when it is actually happening.” Wry. Now to check out your poll.

    Hey, gang, does Rexword require proof of age? Thinking about the “guest curmudgeon’s” “ffs” usage. (Hi, @RichardH!)

    ReplyDelete
  104. Anonymous5:26 PM

    Re: The poll.
    I didn’t see a box to cache I Z as most annoying.
    Can someone remedy this?

    ReplyDelete
  105. Anonymous5:28 PM

    Tlaerance for all. Well not for folks who say the word is exclusively plural. But tolerance for everybody else.

    ReplyDelete
  106. @Gill -- Your supporters are in your CAMP (maybe originally military reference?)

    ReplyDelete
  107. Anonymous5:30 PM

    I’m not going to take usage advice from the APA. I’ll stick with Fowler.
    Peace. Tolerance. Grammar for all.

    ReplyDelete
  108. @Barb

    On a movie set where they do the takes ๐ŸŽฌ

    An anon beat me to my date with the shrink... drove me nuts.

    Someone left their towel on the floor.

    ReplyDelete
  109. Anonymoose5:40 PM

    @fly..... I think you're on to something.
    4:21

    ReplyDelete
  110. Nancy: Seems to me most of the "classic" quiz shows have been dumbed down, whcih I guess makes the viewers feel smarter. Maybe not Jeopardy! but many of the clues have gotten much cutesier. At least you can watch many of the old shows on You Tube.

    ReplyDelete
  111. Anonymous5:58 PM

    Gender๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป is ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป a ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป real ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป thing ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป. Live ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป it ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป love ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป it ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป embrace ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป it ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป accept ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป it ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป.

    ReplyDelete
  112. Rex is too grumpy at times, but this guest contributor takes it to new and unwelcome depths. The puzzle was so-so. The write-up was insufferable.

    ReplyDelete
  113. Re: Singular they:

    In 2015, Fowler's Dictionary of Modern English Usage calls this "the now outmoded use of he to mean 'anyone'", [69] stating:[70] stating:

    "From the earliest times until about the 1960s it was unquestionably acceptable to use the pronoun he (and him, himself, his) with indefinite reference to denote a person of either sex, especially after indefinite pronouns and determiners such as anybody, ... every, etc., after gender-neutral nouns such as person ... [but] alternative devices are now usually resorted to. When a gender-neutral pronoun or determiner ... is needed, the options usually adopted are the plural forms they, their, themselves, etc., or he or she (his or her, etc.)" (Wikipedia)
    ___

    Peace ๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ~ Compassion ~ Tolerance ~ Kindness to all ๐Ÿ•Š

    ReplyDelete
  114. Anonymous6:34 PM

    Anon 5:58
    Tell that to ESPN, The WaPo etc. Everyone but the three women who finished 2nd, 3rd and 4th at the NCAA 500 meter freestyle championships last week.
    Remember what Lincoln said.
    He asked a group how many legs a dog has if you count the tail as a leg.
    The group answered five.
    Lincoln gently corrected them. A dog has four legs. Calling a tail a leg doesn’t make it one he reminded them.
    Gender is real. So are men and women. And women don’t have penises. Men don’t have vaginas.
    But you know that. You’ve know that since before you went to kindergarten. We all did.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:22 PM

      @Anonymous 6:34 You just don't watch the correct alternative porn.

      Delete
  115. @A, @Smith
    DOH! (And that's a wrap.)

    ReplyDelete
  116. @Barbara S (4:55) -- Many thanks --

    ReplyDelete
  117. Coincidentally today on NPR they had a show called Throughline that talked about a woman/genderless person in the late 1700s named Jemima Wilkinson. Google her. Or try to catch the podcast of Throughline. It was very interesting

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I just discovered that the Throughline podcast called Public Universal Friend Was first broadcasted on March 5, 2020. So if you wanna listen to it you’ll have to search for it on their website.

      Delete
  118. I can't stand the singular they, so I'm glad it wasn't used.

    ReplyDelete
  119. Anonymous8:49 PM

    the knuckleheads, i.e. the Red Staters, choose to ignore what's happening in UK, Europe, Singapore, Hong Kong, and (not too surprising) China with BA.2/pi, and will (I haven't parsed the comments yet, so likely in a long line of similar) scream that Covid is over and only Blue Snowflakes make a big deal out of 'a bad cold'.

    ReplyDelete
  120. Anonymous8:50 PM

    @2:40????

    the first one. destroyed the Union victory, for one.

    ReplyDelete
  121. Anonymous9:07 PM

    @8:57
    your assuming that there's only one Universe??? contemporary cosmology has settled on the Multiverse.

    @9:16
    at risk of being redundant, a cigar is often referred to as a "smoke". HUMIDOR is where you keep your smokes. if your serious about your smokes.

    @11:28
    tell that to the neo-Confederates who still want to enslave the darker people.

    @oceanjeremy:
    thank you. at the cost of siloing.

    @1:36
    hardly. a couple of days ago, there were multiple 'anti-choice' comments allowed to stand, but not the rebuttals.

    @Wright-Young:
    hardly. The Trumpster has unbalanced grievance to levels previously unknown.

    @7:22
    well... some do. chicks with dicks are so much better lookin. just sayin.

    ReplyDelete
  122. I enjoy reading OFL's xword critiques along with the occasional guest bloggers' and get a kick out of reading the comments. (I do skip the political and the Rex bashing ones.) Along with the puzzles, they are all part of the great crossword world MOSAIC.

    These kinds of puns in today's offering are often hit and miss and can lead to a mixed solving experience. I feel this theme would have worked better in a weekday 15X15---no themer is over 12 squares long---where the best four could be used.

    As a American of mostly European descent I resent seeing 80D WHITE LIE. I think that's a slanderingly libelous defamation of my people and wonder how such a blatantly racist entry got an editorial stet.

    ReplyDelete
  123. I got ORSONBEAN on the _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A N. im 62, loved the Carson show

    ReplyDelete
  124. Brad,
    I respectfully disagree. Great puzzle. Loved the fill, as you did. But I also thought the theme and theme answers were legitimately witty, and a big improvement over recent weeks. And how can I argue with a puzzle that rewards a Boomer's long memory for Orson Bean and Loewe of Lerner and Loewe. Do stream My Fair Lady, still one of the best musicals, thanks to Bernard Shaw's genius script. And Brad. Don't be such a grump. Cheers.

    ReplyDelete
  125. Typical lame Sunday IMO.

    I Agree the Hippie clue was bad and couldn't she see his hair before dating him?

    Didn't know:
    BAO
    SPINEL
    DRIB

    Didn't like:
    BEAT TIME
    HUSSAR
    SET

    Didn't know:
    ARLO AND JANIS
    LIZZIE FROM CARS

    Didn't Get:
    ARAL

    Liked:
    BULLPEN
    DEMONS
    GENESIS

    ReplyDelete
  126. Burma Shave10:45 AM

    CAMETONOTHING

    Ms. COURIC IS A SASSY SENIOR femme
    who MUST have HADNOPRAYER TO pick.
    It DIDN'TWORKOUT TO MODEL for them,
    she almost NEVER DIDTHETRICK.

    --- LEO LOEWE

    ReplyDelete
  127. Medium? LIKEHELLITIS! Eight MINUTES? I flat out don't believe it. It is just humanly impossible to finish this puzzle in eight minutes. And I'll even let you deduct the time when you "walked away" from it. This was, row by row, column by column, the hardest one I've ever seen--including Saturdays.

    The cluing was absolutely tortuous, wherever it could be. Many of the answers still don't make sense to me, even after--miraculously--I got it done. What does a hippie have to do with missing the cut? How many hippies do you know that played golf? Okay, maybe Alice Cooper. What's a DRIB? Not sparkling = STILL?? I could go on and on, but "Not sparkling" is a good place to stop.

    Yeah, triumph points...but what did I win? Two tickets to a GENESIS concert? (Second prize was four tickets.) I really don't know how to score this. My brain's too tired.

    ReplyDelete
  128. Steve z4:27 PM

    Ten hut is NOT a thing. I’m sorry, it’s just not.

    ReplyDelete
  129. Anonymous8:16 PM

    Was today's guest blogger's rant full-on 100% sarcasm, or a beta testing of the brand new RP2022 emulator?!?!

    ReplyDelete
  130. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  131. My heart was broken and I thought all hope were lost, I never believed I will get back my man again until Dr Oman brought back him within 24 hours with his powerful love spell,  He is reliable for positive result contact the spell caster for love spell, if you want know more about him  watch his YouTube channel;;;;;   https://youtube.com/channel/UCnteU-u8GutKdjxc_NIlVewor write to him on his email address: miraculoussolutionhome@yahoo.com 
      A BIG THANKS TO DR OMAN FOR PUTTING A SMILE ON MY FACE AGAIN.

    ReplyDelete
  132. My heart was broken and I thought all hope were lost, I never believed I will get back my man again until Dr Oman brought back him within 24 hours with his powerful love spell,  He is reliable for positive result contact the spell caster for love spell, if you want know more about him  watch his YouTube channel;;;;;   https://youtube.com/channel/UCnteU-u8GutKdjxc_NIlVewor write to him on his email address: miraculoussolutionhome@yahoo.com 
      A BIG THANKS TO DR OMAN FOR PUTTING A SMILE ON MY FACE AGAIN.

    ReplyDelete
  133. My heart was broken and I thought all hope were lost, I never believed I will get back my man again until Dr Oman brought back him within 24 hours with his powerful love spell,  He is reliable for positive result contact the spell caster for love spell, if you want know more about him  watch his YouTube channel;;;;;   https://youtube.com/channel/UCnteU-u8GutKdjxc_NIlVewor write to him on his email address: miraculoussolutionhome@yahoo.com 
      A BIG THANKS TO DR OMAN FOR PUTTING A SMILE ON MY FACE AGAIN.

    ReplyDelete
  134. It's a privilege to share this miraculous testimony to the world. My name is Peace Gold, My husband divorced me 9 months back and I have been filled with remorse for I didn't know what to do to amend issues with my husband. I searched for help on the internet on how I could get help in my marriage and I discovered great testifiers about DR JOHN SOCO who has been progressive with his spells. I got in touch with him and behold, DR JOHN SOCO, told me that he will prepare a spell for me that will bring back my husband. I was skeptical but I had no other option but to work with him. 3 days later, my husband called me that he's coming back home and from that day till this moment, we have been living peacefully. He is back now with so much love and caring. today i am glad to let you all know that this spell caster has the power to bring lovers back and the most surprising thing is that our love is very strong now, every day is happiness and joy. and There is nothing like being with the man you love. I will highly recommend DR JOHN SOCO to anyone one out there who needs help whatsoever. If you have any problem contact DR JOHN SOCO, i give you 100% guarantee that he will help you!!. Email: Drjohnsoco@gmail.com or whatsApp number: +1(803) 820-2671 ..

    ReplyDelete
  135. It's a privilege to share this miraculous testimony to the world. My name is Peace Gold, My husband divorced me 9 months back and I have been filled with remorse for I didn't know what to do to amend issues with my husband. I searched for help on the internet on how I could get help in my marriage and I discovered great testifiers about DR JOHN SOCO who has been progressive with his spells. I got in touch with him and behold, DR JOHN SOCO, told me that he will prepare a spell for me that will bring back my husband. I was skeptical but I had no other option but to work with him. 3 days later, my husband called me that he's coming back home and from that day till this moment, we have been living peacefully. He is back now with so much love and caring. today i am glad to let you all know that this spell caster has the power to bring lovers back and the most surprising thing is that our love is very strong now, every day is happiness and joy. and There is nothing like being with the man you love. I will highly recommend DR JOHN SOCO to anyone one out there who needs help whatsoever. If you have any problem contact DR JOHN SOCO, i give you 100% guarantee that he will help you!!. Email: Drjohnsoco@gmail.com or whatsApp number: +1(803) 820-2671 ..

    ReplyDelete
  136. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  137. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete