Wednesday, January 28, 2026

Thick, spiked outer covering? / WED 1-28-26 / Score points in Pac-Man, say / Casting rod? / Number indicating position: Abbr. / Arctic fishing shelter / Article of furniture on which a plate of oats might be set? / Walk from one coop to another? / Commoner, informally / Teenager's response to a dad joke / Dirk Nowitzki's longtime team, to fans

Constructor: Kevin Curry

Relative difficulty: Easy


THEME: Animal "S" shift — familiar compound or two-part terms and phrases involving animals are clued as possessive phrases—that is, you have to mentally take the "S" from the front of the second part of the base answer and affix it (with an apostrophe) to the end of the first part. The wacky possessive phrases are clued wackily ("?"-style):

Theme answers:
  • HORSE'S TABLE (17A: Article of furniture on which a plate of oats might be set?) (from "horse stable")
  • DRAGON'S LAYER (23A: Thick, spiked outer covering?) (from ... the movie Dragonslayer?)
  • PIG'S KIN (37A: Relatives in a sty?) (from "pigskin")
  • CAT'S CAN (39A: "Throne" for a lion king?) (from "CAT scan")
  • CHICKEN'S TRIP (46A: Walk from one coop to another?) (from "chicken strip")
  • TURTLE'S HELL (56A: Being flipped on its back, e.g.?)  (from "turtle shell")
Word of the Day: DRAGONSLAYER (see 23A) —

Dragonslayer is a 1981 American dark fantasy film directed by Matthew Robbins from a screenplay he co-wrote with Hal Barwood. It stars Peter MacNicol in his feature film debut, Ralph RichardsonJohn Hallam, and Caitlin Clarke. It was a co-production between Paramount Pictures and Walt Disney Productions, where Paramount handled North American distribution and Disney handled international distribution through Buena Vista International. The story is set in a fictional medieval kingdom where a young wizard encounters challenges as he hunts a dragon, Vermithrax Pejorative.

It is the second joint production between Paramount and Disney, after Popeye (1980), and is more mature than most contemporary Disney films. Because the audience expected the film to be solely children's entertainment, the violence, adult themes and brief nudity were somewhat controversial, though Disney did not hold the North American distribution rights. The film was rated PG in the U.S. Like The Black Hole (1979), the version of the film broadcast on the Disney Channel was edited to remove two scenes.

The special effects were created at Industrial Light and Magic, the first use of ILM outside of a Lucasfilm production. Phil Tippett had co-developed an animation technique there for The Empire Strikes Back (1980) called go motion, a variation on stop motion. This led to the film's nomination for the Academy Award for Best Visual Effects, but it lost to Raiders of the Lost Ark, the only other visual effects nominee that year, whose special effects were also provided by ILM. Including the hydraulic 40-foot (12 m) model, the dragon consists of 16 puppets dedicated to flying, crawling, or breathing fire.

The film received generally positive reviews from critics, but it performed poorly at the box office, grossing $14.1 million worldwide against a production budget of $18 million. It was nominated for the Academy Award for Best Original Score, which went to Chariots of Fire. It was nominated for a Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation, again given to Raiders of the Lost Ark. (wikipedia)

• • •

If nothing else, this puzzle has inspired me to watch DRAGONSLAYER (1981). Despite being the target audience for this thing (12-year-olds who were into Dungeons & Dragons, Star Wars, and video games), I somehow missed it completely. It came out the same year as Raiders, so I was probably too busy seeing that five or six times. Anyway, 45 years later I think I am in exactly the right frame of mind to watch a movie featuring a puppet dragon called Vermithrax Pejorative. That's its surname! Pejorative! Amazing. Sounds bad! Anyway, thanks for the time travel, puzzle. Now I've got a new movie for my already extensive Watchlist. As for the rest of this puzzle, it seemed rudimentary and dull to me, and lacked a clear conceptual cohesiveness. Why animals? Why is one of the animals imaginary? Why is one of the animals (cat) not an animal at all in its base phrase (CAT scan), while all the other animals remain animals on both sides of the "S" switch? I kept waiting for the revealer that never came—give me a reason to be doing any of this. What's the gag? The whole "S"-shift thing feels very very Very old-fashioned. Like, I've seen variations of this specific kind of wackiness a lot before. Feels very '90s-coded, this kind of rudimentary wordplay. The clues are trying valiantly to make it all fun—toilets for lions, pig family reunions—but ultimately the wackiness all seemed pretty tepid. And then the fill was bland, with a tired short stuff—LOS LAS ORD ADE ECO EMO etc. The bottom is particularly grim, with a whole stack of things I'd rather not see (a turtle being tortured on top of AD FEES on top of a DESPOT). I would not say this puzzle is "SO LAME," but then I would never use that phrase since disabled people I knew got me to stop using "lame" as a general pejorative decades ago. Speaking of Pejorative, I gotta wrap this up so I can go watch DRAGONSLAYER! (Actually, I gotta work today, but later, for sure!)


This one was fairly color-by-numbers, right from the jump, with the gimme AÇAI allowing me to toggle to Downs and tick them all off in order. Repeat same thing with MEDUSA. The only resistance today, outside the semi-wacky theme answers, was in the cluing for a handful of the short clues. POWER had a tricky "?" clue (13D: Outlet store?—because an "outlet" is where POWER is "stored"). For some reason CLIPS took me a few crosses to get (46D: Assortment to view on YouTube)—I think of myself as watching videos, not CLIPS (which, to me, are parts of larger filmed things), but ... fair enough. Had SLINK before SKULK (33D: Sneak around)—just glad I didn't write in SNEAK there. Seems like something I'd do, especially if I was going too fast and not really paying attention. Second ORD in the past week, so that's ... bad. Had to wait on the "N" in SNARFS since it could so easily have been SCARFS (44D: Wolfs (down)). But this is all ordinary difficulty—the kind of vagueness and misdirection you might find on any day. Very mild. Mostly this one just seemed boring. Not POOR. Just blah.


Bullets:
  • 5A: Monster whose gaze remained lethal after her death (MEDUSA) — I'd forgotten this. That 12yo who played D&D (but failed to see DRAGONSLAYER) probably knew this MEDUSA fact very well. I miss that kid.
  • 40A: Arctic fishing shelter (ICE HUT) — that's where I.C.E. should go—to the ICE HUT! And then, you know, stay there. Til summer.
  • 2D: Member-owned business (CO-OP) — yeah, I see you trying to make this a non-chicken answer, but this still looks exactly like "COOP," which is in your CHICKEN'S TRIP clue; I'd probably have tried to figure out a way to get rid of it (or, easier, just rewrite that CHICKEN'S TRIP clue (46A: Walk from one coop to another?)—there are way, way funnier ways to go at that one). 
  • 30A: Casting rod? (WAND) — I'm telling you, 12yo me would've been really into crosswords if he'd known there were MEDUSAs and DRAGONSLAYERs and wizards with WANDs!). Ooh, and Pac-Man!! (6D: Score points in Pac-Man, say). You could've sold me on your adult pastime pretty easy, I think. 

That's it for today. See you next time.

Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld

[Follow Rex Parker on BlueSky and Facebook and Letterboxd]
=============================
❤️ Support this blog ❤️: 
  • Venmo (@MichaelDavidSharp)]
=============================
✏️ Upcoming Crossword Tournaments ✏️
=============================
📘 My other blog 📘:

15 comments:

  1. Bob Mills5:55 AM

    Mostly easy, but I needed trial-and-error in the SE. I didn't catch the double meaning(s) of "Turtle's hell/TURTLESHELL" and the other theme entries, so it became a solve by the crosses throughout. Too early in the morning, maybe.

    ReplyDelete

  2. Easy-Medium. A little more resistance than our usual Tuesdays (solved without reading the theme clues). Liked it a bit better than @Rex did.
    * * * _ _

    Overwrites:
    I was close at 5A. With no crosses I put in gorgon instead of MEDUSA.
    pARk before CART for the food vendor's place at 39D
    ScARFS before SNARFS at 44D.
    Close again at 60A. tsa before PRE.
    Peon before PeEr before PLEB at 54D led to (briefly) keeping eArS on instead of TABS at 65A.

    No WOEs.

    My nominee for a funnier 46A: "Rhode Island Reds' single in the Top 40"

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good morning! Definitely at least medium and maybe medium challenging for me this morning. The western 2/3 fell right in, but the endings and the fill around them just took me much longer to see. Like @REX I was looking for something cat related.... until I saw it, then I was OK. Took me forever to see TURTLESHELL (wanted TURTLESkiLL at first???? what was I thinking?). Liked it a lot more than @REX... 4 stars from me. No need for a revealer, I thought the gag was fun enough. I think it just depends what floats your boat. Great puzzle from my end, Kevin! : )

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous6:35 AM

    I was so looking forward to 46A being more like "Part of a fight in the coop" being CHICKEN'S HIT, but alas, it was not to be. Otherwise I liked the theme better than @Rex but agree overall. Thought TURTLE'S HELL was the best of them, although CHICKEN'S HIT would have been even better.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It's very difficult to square the Peter McNichol in Dragonslayer with the one we get eight years later in Ghostbusters II, but he co-steals the show in each alongside the female lead with Caitlin Clarke in the first (RIP) and Sigourney Weaver in the second. In fact, in the case of the latter, I'd argue that McNichol's increasingly exasperated conversations with the film's primary antagonist-as-frumpy-medieval-tyrant-art saves the otherwise lackluster sequel whose finale, I must note, bears a striking thematic similarity to the conclusion of The Last Jedi, and where the power of NYC/Galactic Love is all ya need.

    But I digress. OFL errs. This was a fine puzzle, 3/4 stars on the cinematic Ebert Scale.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I thought the theme was pretty cute, especially PIGSKIN ans CHICKENSTRIP.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I’ll formally use the SO LAME descriptor - flat theme and goofy fill. It was on the trickier side midweek so there’s that I guess.

    VERA

    ICE HUT x SHACK is the highlight. The two long downs were throw ins - plenty of real estate but no meat. UNBIND, SNARFS, AD FEES etc just drag the whole grid down.

    Madame MEDUSA

    I liked the difficulty level - other than that it was a flat Wednesday morning solve.

    Sturgill

    ReplyDelete
  8. Absolutely loved DRAGONSLAYER, and I was a fair bit older than Rex's 12. It will not look like much today, but at the time those were cutting edge special effects.

    Very much enjoyed the S-shifting puzzle. I did not like the clue for SNARFS, as I always hear scarf down and snarf up.

    ReplyDelete
  9. In other news, tomorrow will be my NYT debut puzzle. I hope you enjoy it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Woo hoo! WTG! And a Thursday!

      Delete
  10. Routine Wednesday puzzle, at most Medium in difficulty. It didn't sparkle, but I found the theme mildly amusing and probably would add on an extra half-star to Rex's rating.

    This is the first time I've heard of the word LAME being frowned upon. I feel as if I USE that word all the time and nobody's ever SAID anything. I think I'll keep using it. I don't think people use the word LAME much to refer to the physically disabled, not anymore anyway, for this to be an actual issue of concern. For example, Trump and company continue to blame Biden for the current economy, but their blame is lame. I wouldn't bat an eye saying so.

    Only yesterday I felt the need to get clear on the distinction between a CAT SCAN (nowadays the preferred term is CT scan) and an MRI. It's a pretty big difference. A CT scan uses X-rays, a fairly strong (i.e. highly energetic) form of electromagnetic radiation, strong enough for genetic mutations to be a risk. An MRI uses magnetic fields and radio waves, which as electromagnetic radiation goes, are far less energetic and far less risky: the photons in that frequency range don't have enough energy to knock electrons out of their shells and thus won't damage DNA molecules. On the other hand, an MRI is a lengthier procedure. And I'm told they can be pretty loud.

    In addition to "slink" as an alternative to SKULK, there's also "stalk", which I almost put in.

    That'll be all for now. I think the snowfall has ended in my part of Connecticut, for the time being. Hope the weather hasn't been too bad for you, wherever you are.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Oh, bravo to the mind that came up with this wordplay theme – never been done before. I wouldn’t expect less from Kevin, whose {Pan in the butt] made 2025’s Clues of the Year list (answer in reply). Also, good choice to tighten the theme by limiting it to animals.

    Freshness in the grid as well, as every theme answer is not only an in-the-language phrase, but a NYT debut.

    I like the PuzzPair©️ of RELAY RACES and WAND, the lovely answers SKULK and UPSHOT, the rare-in-crosswords five-letter semordnilap (LOOTS), and how IT’S ODD contradicts its clue number. I also like the unintended airport code (ORD) sharing the box with the intended one (LAS).

    But mostly I like the play of words in the theme, a “Hah!”-heavy solve for me, the loudest coming at TURTLESHELL.

    Your mood elevator was greatly appreciated, Kevin. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  12. [“Help me, lord, to avoid the other way to interpret this answer”]



    BUGSPRAYER

    ReplyDelete