Storybook baddie / TUE 7-22-25 / Utah ski resort / Hollywood icon Hayworth / Company whose business is picking up? / "Come again??," casually / Purple smoothie berry / Planetary body, to poets / Informal hangout at which attendees may jam or gossip
Tuesday, July 22, 2025
Constructor: Jeremy Newton
Relative difficulty: Easy
The ice-cream answers (I'm not gonna type these out vertically—just consult the grid, above, for the full visual effect):
- VAT (1D: Big winery fixture)
- "I LOVE YOU SO MUCH" (13D: Words that express a deep-felt affection)
- GROOVED (24D: Shook it to the beat)
- GOES CUCKOO OVER (8D: Enjoys immensely)
Rita Hayworth (born Margarita Carmen Cansino; October 17, 1918 – May 14, 1987) was an American actress, dancer, and pin-up girl. She achieved fame in the 1940s as one of the top stars of the Golden Age of Hollywood, and appeared in 61 films in total over 37 years. The press coined the term "The Love Goddess" to describe Hayworth, after she had become the most glamorous screen idol of the 1940s. She was the top pin-up girl for GIs during World War II.
Hayworth is widely known for her performance in the 1946 film noir Gilda, opposite Glenn Ford, in which she played the femme fatale in her first major dramatic role. She is also known for her performances in Only Angels Have Wings (1939), The Strawberry Blonde (1941), Blood and Sand (1941), The Lady from Shanghai (1947), Pal Joey (1957), and Separate Tables (1958). Fred Astaire, with whom she made two films, You'll Never Get Rich (1941) and You Were Never Lovelier (1942), once called her his favorite dance partner. She also starred in the Technicolor musical Cover Girl (1944), with Gene Kelly. She is listed as one of the top 25 female motion picture stars of all time in the American Film Institute's survey, AFI's 100 Years...100 Stars. For her contribution to the motion picture industry, Hayworth received a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame at 1645 Vine Street in 1960.
In 1980, Hayworth was diagnosed with early-onset Alzheimer's disease, which contributed to her death in 1987 at age 68. The public disclosure and discussion of her illness drew attention to Alzheimer's, and helped to increase public and private funding for research into the disease. (wikipedia)
I made some pretty predictable mistakes today, all easily fixable. I also typo'd ACHY as ACHE (fingers have a mind of their own sometimes) (35A: Sore, as joints) and had to search for my error at the end. Had the "U" at 45A: Company whose business is picking up? (UBER) and wrote in USPS (?). Right next door to that, I wrote in ROAMS before ROVES (of course) (42A: Wanders here and there). For 51D: Kept ___ on (monitored) (TABS), I (again, of course) had EYES. But that's really it for SCREW-ups, and those SCREW-ups were all very minor. The puzzle basically put up no resistance—not unusual for a Tuesday, I guess, but I wish the puzzle had had at least a little fight in it, or some surprise or cleverness beyond the theme. It really needed ... something more. No matter how clever your theme, the bulk of the solver's time will be spent filling in non-theme answers, so that part of the puzzle should really do a little something more than just sit there taking up space.
A few more things:
- 65A: Hollywood icon Hayworth (RITA) — making RITA Hayworth my Word of the Day really solidified for me the fact that I get RITA Hayworth and AVA Gardner hopelessly confused. They're basically the same person to me, despite the fact that one of them is in two of my favorite movies, and the other ... isn't. They're both brunette bombshells, Hollywood royalty of a certain era—the exact same era, in fact. Their careers were solidly mid-century. In fact, their lives are almost coterminous (Hayworth 1918-87, Gardner 1922-90). I thought RITA Hayworth was married to Mickey Rooney at one point, but that was AVA Gardner (who was also married to ARTIE Shaw (also of crossword fame) and Frank Sinatra). RITA Hayworth, on the other hand, was married to Orson Welles, as well as Prince Aly Khan (and a few other guys as well). RITA's career was, to my mind, the more enviable one, if only because she was in Gilda (1946) and Only Angels Have Wings (1939) (though that's really Jean Arthur's movie, as far as female stars go). Gardner got an Academy Award nomination for Supporting Actress Mogambo (recommended only for Grace Kelly completists like my '90s self), and she starred opposite Burt Lancaster in Robert Siodmak's great The Killers (1946), but still, gotta give the acting edge to RITA. Maybe I'll be able to keep them straight in my head now. More likely, not.
- 32D: Vampire bat feature (FANGS) — sticking with the movies for a minute ... and speaking of vampires ... I watched The Lost Boys (1987) yesterday for my weekly Movie Club, and it was So Much Worse than I remembered. The shallowest characterization you will ever see in any movie. No one has any motivation. It's basically an extended late '80s MTV music video, not nearly dark enough to be scary, and not nearly as funny as it thinks it is. If you are a big fan of the Cor(e)ys, if you found their on-screen antics hilarious, then boy is this the movie for you. If you want to see great actors (Dianne Wiest!) absolutely wasted, shoved into roles that are beneath them, this is the movie for you. Kiefer Sutherland and Corey Feldman had both been in the truly great Stand By Me just one year earlier. Talk about a come-down. Actually, if you just wanna do a memory lane thing to your teendom (my teendom) then, OK, I get it, this *is* the movie for you. It definitely is ... of a time. But as a movie, it is Ter-ri-ble (note: none of my Movie Club agreed, they all seemed to enjoy it; I just sat there silently watching them all talk, stunned that I had once respected these people and counted them among my friends ...).
- 7D: Planet whose evening temperatures plunge to -200ΒΊF (MARS) — wanted to write in earth, largely because I was freezing last night—the house is set up for summer sleeping, windows open, bedding down to just a sheet, but last night temps went way down and I had to get up in the middle of the night in search of something to make me warmer (a nearby hoodie did the trick).
- 56D: Father of Thor in both myth and the Marvel Universe (ODIN) — why in the world does any part of this clue following "Thor" exist??? He's the father of Thor. That's it. Unless Marvel is paying you for product placement, there is absolutely no reason to mention their stupid universe. So weird how they choose *this* clue to be (unnecessarily, uninterestingly) longer, when there are so many other terse clues that could've used spicing up. There is limited cluing real estate. You gotta use it better than this.
[Follow Rex Parker on BlueSky and Facebook]
=============================
❤️ Support this blog ❤️:
✏️ Upcoming Crossword Tournaments ✏️
- Boswords (Boston) (Sun. July 27, 2025)
- Lollapuzzoola 18 (NYC) (Sat., Aug. 9, 2025)
- Midwest Crossword Tournament (Chicago) (Sat., Oct. 4, 2025)
π My other blog π:
- Pop Sensation (vintage paperbacks)
92 comments:
Monday-level easy. The only hard part for me was figuring out the theme. Thanks, Rex.
I disliked SPUR, spurs are not ‘part of a…boot’ they are an accessory, just like a watch is not part of your wrist.
Monday easy. And at least to me any gimmick which I don't notice until after I finish, or more like today when Rex mentions it, is uninteresting to me. Why bother?
Enjoyed the cranky write-up more than the very meh puzzle. And thank you for the new-to-me word: coterminous. Love it.
I looooove ice cream, but this puzzle left me cold.
Preach!
Unlike Rex I don’t get upset by easy puzzles because I’m generally a very slow solver so the occasional whoosh is a happy event. Had to do two quick rewrites on this: immediately typed in Saywhat for say again? And GOESCrazyOver for you-know-what. The first got fixed by the crosses, but I still like it better than SCUSEME, and of course Crazy came up short for letters so had to rethink. Figuring out the theme was way beyond me…good thing it was not needed for the solve.
I seriously doubt Cicero ever said 'silence is one of the arts of conversation.' Someone made that up and attributed it to him. Apparently Hannah More wrote or said something similar.
Whee? wHee? Wth is wHHHee?
The idea of stacking Os on a V to represent ice cream cones isn't even new: https://rexwordpuzzle.blogspot.com/2019/09/org-with-world-factbook-wed-9-4-19.html
I only considered the theme briefly and thought it had something to do with making coffee.
This puzzle has the stamp of quality. A fun visual theme, excellently presented, amidst a just-right Tuesday answer set and clue level. From start to end, I felt as if I were in the hands of a craftsperson.
Not to mention that this is the perfect puzzle to counter the heat of a very hot summer. A pick-me-up.
Theme echoes all over: EAT ME, BEACH, ORB, MENU, and even I LOVE YOU SO MUCH and GOES CUCKOO OVER.
SHINE in the box as well, with the lovely HAVOC, ONYX, GNAW, and TALL ORDER.
This is the second day in a row with a terrific theme, after yesterday’s GOTTA CATCH ‘EM ALL, and Jeremy is all about theme – not a themeless among his 29 Times puzzles.
Joy in the box today, and a splendid outing. Thank you, Jeremy!
Agreed on Monday level easy and left me wanting more. My fastest Tuesday in the last few months
Saw the first reveal (TALL ORDER) and thought maybe they were going for a beverage. By the time I got down to the south I was just plugging and chugging and didn’t even notice the second reveal - so I finished thinking the V-things were supposed to represent some type of a drink.
It’s probably not a positive development that it is becoming more and more frequent that (a) a lot of us don’t bother with the theme and just wait for Rex’s explanation, and (b) reading Rex’s write-up is more enjoyable than solving the puzzle.
John Stewart's opinion of the NYTXW in the first 30 seconds of this clip. https://bsky.app/profile/thedailyshow.com/post/3lujk6biaps2s
Hey All !
Grumpy Rex returns! Must've been the cold night. π
I believe we've seen ICE Cream Cone puz(s) like this before, no? The ole brain is trying to tell me yes, but I can't prove it.
Another high Blocker puz, 44 today. Normal max is 38, NYT submission rule. Although, it does say (something like) "can be changed at the discretion of the editor."
I liked the puz overall, rare to have Down Themers with a regular symmetric grid, usually it's left/right symmetry. Got puz done quick, with NO PROB.
Is TEA MUSA a PEKOE blend? Har.
Enough CROCK from me, have a great Tuesday!
Three F's
RooMonster
DarrinV
I guess they're ice cream cones in those shaded squares? I spent too much time trying to interpret the Os and Vs as letters before it occurred to me. I think this one needed both of the two revealers, since each is a bit allusive. I think I like it, but I need to give it some more time.
My only problem with this one was reading 46 Down as 36 Down and wondering how Ivory or Dove could be considered SDRUBS, which seemed very far-fetched. The real answer was moo-cow easy as we live near a big medical center and you're likely to see folks in SCRUBS just about anywhere.
Other than that I missed thinking of the V's as cones, which is my bad, but most of the puzz was on the drab side and I just wanted to be done with it.
Unlike OFL, I thought SCUSEME was the highlight of the grid.
Kind of an interesting visual trick, JN, Just Not enough other sparkly stuff to make for an interesting solve. Thanks for a baby scoop of fun.
My experience precisely.
Nice follow-up on yesterday's banana split.
The puzzle was very easy, as expected on a Tuesday. This is good because I am horrible at crossword grid art and I simply could not see the Os as ice cream scoops and could only see the Vs as arrows pointing down. Compound that with the fact that once SCOOPEDUP revealed itself, the only thing I could think of was scooping up/out a kitty litter box. [insert eyeroll + D’OH]
How to distinguish Hayworth from Gardner: Rita danced in a lot of movies, Ava only once in a full-blown musical scene (Barefoot Contessa).
Unless I misheard him, that’s his opinion of the LA Times crossword! Which, given his career-long ‘NYC is the best at everything’ schtick, implies his… ah, I see what you mean.
Lost Boys has no motivation?? Michael is trying to impress the girl, Sam is trying to protect Michael, David is trying to make Star happy, the Frog brothers are trying to get rid of vampires, Lucy is trying to survive as a single mother (y'know, find work and love, keep her kids happy)....so....who exactly has no motivation??? Sorry brah, seems like the problem is you on that one. I'm not saying the movie is GREAT...but it's not a bad as you want it to be.
Also...I've only heard the term 'completionist'. Not only is it clearer and rolls off the tongue just a little better....the definition is also more in line with what you're saying! (Completist: an obsessive, typically indiscriminate, collector or fan of something (Oxford). Completionist:
someone who is determined to finish something entirely. This could be finishing a game, collecting every item in a series, or seeing every movie an actor has made. (AI Overview.) )
Vampire bats do not have fangs!!!!! No sucking involved.The lap up the blood from wounds they cut into their prey.
I came back in the hope that some of you are marine biologists, and can clear up my doubts about ORCAS as "deep sea predators." Orcas spend most of their time in coastal waters, not the deep sea, but there is at least study that tracked a dive of 700+ meters. But to me the clue suggests something that lives down deep -- which by definition would not be a mammal.
Yes they do. They may not be the long long, pointy things that are prevalent in fictional accounts, but they do have sharp incisors and canines (which is basically the definition of FANGS) intended to create a wound for blood consumption. Hell, there are even some spiders that have FANGS.
Nice mini theme with EATME SCREW ILOVEYOUSOMUCH dominating the left coast.
The first half of the alphabet is ATOM.
Always up for a SCOOP or three, especially in summer. Thanks, Jeremy Newton.
Literally WHY? Why Star (who is Star?) why Laddie (!?!?) why follow the biker dudes on your bike or for any reason? who is Jason Patric? who is anyone who are the boys what is their relationship to the leader why does it feel like a bad “horror” version of GOONIES etc etc there is literally ZERO characterization, none, nada, the family just shows up in town and all of a sudden vampires … the end. you should rewatch and get back to me it does Not hold up. Thank you ~RP
lol “AI Overview” no wonder you’re Anonymous
Ugh “brah” why did this mid online anon guy even get his comment published. People need to learn to disagree without being dicks about it.
Boom!!!
I'm a marine biologist, but must have been absent that day. Have no idea.
Respect for the thematic five-scoop “looooove”
Had no idea those were ice cream scoops until Rex pointed it out, but it didn't really matter as the puzzle was easily completed as a themeless. We've had ORD, NEONS, and EAT ME a lot lately...ho-hum.
I agree with Rex both in that the constructor gets points for trying something different, but also that the execution was not great.
I enjoyed this, a casual vibe throughout. Tuesdays are easy every week.
I liked this puzzle. Agree that ScuseMe was a great answer. How is it spelled wrong? Completely missed the puzzle art, which I often do. Too much into the words. Glad to see Rex is back.
Yes! Trying to figure which movie Rex enjoyed! I'm a Night of the Iguana Fan....
Ava Garner wrote a terrific autobiography, Ava, My Story.
Got a kick out of seeing the ice cream cones.
Here's what I saw. A "V" with increasing numbers of "O"s over it. Why? Initially it baffled me, but I filled in what remained of the gray squares accordingly and that was very helpful.
Unfortunately I didn't need any help in this very easy puzzle.
But I'm proud of myself. When I got to SCOOPED UP (though admittedly not a nanosecond sooner) I immediately thought of an ice cream cone. Which is impressive for me, since I normally don't think visually.
It's a cute idea, I suppose. And the cluing is better than the average Tuesday. But it still played very easy.
I loved the visual representation of the triple scoop cone in the grid. I often have double scoop cones because I like to try the different, exotic-sounding flavors, but I've never had a triple scoop. I don't know if I could eat it fast enough before it melted all over my hands.
I don't agree with Rex on the old fill and non-excitement. There are only so many words in English and when you need them to intersect cleanly and work around a theme, well what can you expect? Now, if this was a themeless puzzle where those restrictions don't apply, I could see the complaint being legitimate.
I do agree on the fingers having a mind of their own. I type with a word in mind and watch my hands go somewhere else, no idea why. And I'm a pretty good typist, used to do some typesetting at a newspaper while in college.
Jeremy Newton, thanks for the nice Tuesday puzzle. Now I can't wait to find an ice cream shop and indulge.
Extremely easy even for a Tuesday, but any puzzle that celebrates ice cream is okay by me. Yesterday I bought Klondike Bars, which I haven’t eaten in years, but they were on sale and the weather forecast is upper 90’s for the next 10 days. Both very solid justifications for a splurge I thought. Now the delicious looking picture that RP posted has me adding waffle cones to my shopping list. So many flavors, so little time. Yum!
I agree with Rex and made all of the same minor mistakes that he did. I disagree with his assessment of The Lost Boys. It’s a fun, simple movie that doesn’t take itself too seriously. Michael followed the other boys to get to know Star, and maybe meet some new people. I do think it would’ve been cool to see him become a full vampire and Sam has to save him.
Another easy puzzle - solved as a themeless & came here for the theme.
I didn't know what TE-AM-USA was until I looked harder & saw I had written it correctly as TEAM USA.
Kind of nice to take a break, I guess. We'll probably get clobbered later in the week - ?
Thank you, Jeremy :)
Very cute. I was mystified by the V, OV, and OOV, but, okay, went ahead and filled in OOOV without its surroundings and issued a mental challenge to the constructor: Let's see you deal with that! Which he did, just fine. But I didn't understand that they represented the stages in creating a triple-SCOOP cone until the end, and loved the surprise. I got a smile out of the complementary I LOVE YOU (i.e., ice cream) SO MUCH and GOES CUCKOO OVER, which explain the TALL ORDER. Footnote: in Wisconsin, a "single" looks like this OOV.
SCUSEME could have been perfectly clued as the “Purple Haze” lyric (“Scuse me while I kiss the sky”).
Just this past weekend watched the luminous Rita Hayworth with Orson Welles in his notable noir, The Lady from Shanghai, currently on the Criterion Channel. Come for the ending but stay for the whole movie!
Easy except for tracking down a typo. No WOEs and me too for eyeS before TABS and ACHe before ACHY being it for costly erasures. That said, I did momentarily blank on HRC.
Cute with some fun theme answers, liked it.
Bummer. I guess the sea was angry that day.
A medium-ish Tuesday downs-only for me. Would have been easy but I really screwed things up in the centre when I threw in GyratED at 24 and then compounded my error by entering Seneca instead of CICERO at 30D. Well, they were both Roman, both philosophers, both writers, both killed by the state, but apparently only one of them could deliver a good speech. Then I topped that by not bothering to question my DaTOO at 49A. But I knew I’d done something dumb there so when the puzzle ever so kindly informed me that I was an idiot, I went directly back there and worked it out.
It always bothers me when the NYTXW wants me to believe you can feed a horse a single OAT (61D). Have they ever seen one of those beasts chow down?
Really liked the 2 long downs which were not gimmes but nicely gettable from the inferable crosses. The double revealer never affected my solve, but I like it. I’m sure there will be others who will pronounce it overkill. (Even though the symmetry’s nice.)
I’m writing this at about 11 pm Monday night and I’m listening to an old Dave Brubeck/Paul Desmond playlist. Hard not to feel good about whatever you’re doing while listening this stuff. When I was in rehab last year we had to do our forced meditation (good for you, I’m told) to weird Tibetan music. One day I asked the session leader if she had “Take Five” or “Blue Rondo a la Turk” on her playlist. She glared icily at me. Yes, I was being a smart ass, but you’ve got to try to have a sense of humour in dire circumstances. Some of those people took themselves far too seriously.
This was one of the easiest puzzles I have ever done, honestly.
Or the almost as famous mondegreen "Scuse my while I kiss this guy".
Taking Pablo's cue: "No, Hendrix did NOT sing ___________ while I kiss this guy."
Really surprised this was accepted as almost the exact same puzzle ran in 2019
https://www.xwordinfo.com/Crossword?date=9/4/2019
A Latte does not have foam; that’s what distinguishes it from a cappuccino
I basically forgot again about trying to figure out the theme until I read Rex. It didn't help that at 24 down for "Shook it to the beat" I initially had GOT DOWN.
I was baffled what the black tea variety 18 across was, until: oh, duhhh! Orange PEKOE was the only tea we drank while I was growing up (specifically, Red Rose).
My wife lives on that stuff. She's consumed copious quantities daily as long as I've known her (over 50 years). As a recent convert to tea, I've actually come to like it. I remember old - maybe 1970s - TV ads in which some British guy with. a posh accent tastes a cup and says, "Only in Canada, eh? Pity." Wait! I've found a YouTube video of one of those ads.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAtDXOnmqiM
I especially like that the Brit, tasting Canadian tea for the first time, says "eh".
I think you're mostly right, lattes have much more steamed milk and less foam than cappuccinos, but there is still a thin foam on top. It's just inherent in the steaming process. I guess if you're a mad purist, you could demand that the barista not allow any foam to escape the pitcher but enough people enjoy it that it has become the norm. And, hey, who doesn't love a little foamy artwork?
@Les nice find! I remember that ad very well; 1977 according to the poster of the video. Looks like he has hundreds of old TV ads!
I sat down with the puzzle and a bowl of the peach ice cream that I just made. I solved the puzzle as an extremely easy themeless, ignoring - as always - the silly shaded squares. Then I came here and saw the theme. No cone for me, though.
Anonymous 6:34 AM
Spurs as accessories. Interesting choice of word. Jewelry , ties , yes
But a spur attached to a boot. No Don’t think that is an accessory.
On the other hand, I see nothing wrong with the clue and answer. Most people wouldn’t either. At least, it makes more sense than calling it an accessory.
Clues-only solve with a little grid cleaner up at the end, so I never consider the gimmick. Super-easy even with just clues.
Les s More
Don’t know how I would feel about the tea ad (which as an American I have never seen ) if I had seen it thousands of times. But I literally laughed out loud when I read your post
Just here to say I’ve always thought of Rita as a redhead. She did star in films as a brunette but that red hair was iconic! Love the blog. Thanks :)
I know most people love ice cream but I don’t. So I rarely order it. And another fave, waffle cones I hated when I was a kid but now I just avoid all cones, if possible. But after finishing the puzzle, I was at least able to figure out the theme
Ass they say, Rex almost always has a complaint that has me scratching my head. This time it’s scuse. me. I gather he doesn’t like the way it looks on the page. But that’s what people say.
What is a sesh? Never heard of it
What is sesh?
Agreed! Orca are not deep sea creatures!
I don’t see anyone else commenting on 25 Across. Did I miss a comment? Shouldn’t the answer be SAC? I think Shirley Chisholm was the first female presidential candidate for a major party. HRC was the first female nominee.
Another Peggy Lee theme.
Maybe a dumb question but how does “took a side?” mean ATE?
V. easy. In the newspaper version, the clue for 66A is merely “informal hangout“ - it doesn’t have ‘at which attendees may jam or gossip.’
Oh, well. we might as well keep dancing.
Rita Hayworth and Ginger Roger’s were cousins.
And break out the booze!
Chisholm ran for the Democratic presidential nomination but was not chosen. She was never a candidate for president. The clue is correct.
Rex, I agree. I watched LOST BOYS about a year ago. I had fond memories of it from some distant moments in my youth, but it is a truly awful movie.
Of course she was a candidate for president. She failed to secure the nomination, ending her candidacy. She was not a nominee, but she was a candidate
QuΓ© desastre. QuΓ© lΓ‘stima. Ah, asΓ es la vida. {CROCK is beyond my Spanish skills.}
Ooooh, those are ice cream cones?!
Ha. About every third answer in this puzzle is cringe inducing, so of course I loved it. And of course I could hardly wait to talk about my cowgirl's spurs. WHEE.
People: 5
Places: 3
Products: 1
Partials: 5
Foreignisms: 1
--
Gary's Grid Gunk Gauge: 15 of 76 (20%)
Funnyisms: 3 π
Tee-Hee: Well, as I have said many times, if you wanna write for the NYTXW, forget π¦, go read the bathroom walls in a middle school: EAT ME. SCREW. Pussy foot.
Uniclues:
1 My skeptical response to my tailor's recommended suit colors.
2 Fat cannibal goes to the mall.
3 Took an easy class.
4 Cannibal devoured cat-owning accountant.
5 How my dominatrix cleans her footwear.
1 NEONS? SCUSE ME...
2 OGRE ROVES MENU (~)
3 SCOOPED UP A-PLUS (~)
4 ATE GROOVED CPA
5 SPUR SOAP
My Fascinating Crossword Uniclue Keepsake from Last Year: A ceramic one saying, "World's fairly typical dad." KEEPS-IT-REAL MUG.
¯\_(γ)_/¯
@Anonymous 5:59 PM
ATE a side dish.
This would have been a super Monday for folks just beginning to tackle the NYTCW. It’s a very fine demonstration of theme and some word play, and a common manner of introducing a theme with a decent reveal and a decent visual effect - the cones and scoops - and hallelujah! - without any actual drawing or pictures, only letters. Nicely done. And I have seen it before. Sure maybe with a slight “twist” perhaps. Clever, but done.
Possibly other real old timers, like me, who havre solved so many puzzles (in my case, over 23,000 just for the NYT) remember previously used themes. It’s not a complaint; it can’t help but happen. Personally, I remembered this one because I liked it then and I liked it today. So, it wasn’t the theme that rankled, it was (as OFL observed) the lack of any sparkle outside the theme in the supporting fill. Dull.
I am not saying that this wasn’t on par with other early week puzzles and should not have been accepted, but that I have been disappointed with the editors lately. They were asleep at the switch.
As @Rex demonstrates frequently and with, to me, amazing off-the-cuff creativity and facility, coming up with improvements that both solve problems but also add interest and sparkle to a puzzle is not difficult for the pros out there.
Accordingly, this message is for the NYT editorial staff who I assume are at least very able if not expert constructors themselves: do more of your job. Please. Help constructors polish and improve. For one thing, it will make your job more fun.
Editors, why not take these teachable moments and share your experience with newer or less experienced constructors, or even with “regulars” who may be resting on their laurels just a tad. Rather than accepting less than what we oldsters used to love about “the premier daily crossword,” do just a little more. Help restore this puzzle to at least what this solver wants and pays for - a puzzle appropriate to the day that challenges, entertains and teaches.
I am certain the editorial staff well knows how difficult a mountain new constructors climb just to get that first coveted byline. Help them grow, please. And help the experienced constructors see new opportunities. If there’s one thing about which I am certain, it’s that nobody knows everything. Editors, please give us all more opportunities to learn.
Chose and consumed a side dish from a menu.
Session, I think. I asked my 12 year old granddaughter
Orange PEKOE was in every Lipton’s tea bag of my youth. Then I learned more about tea - loose tea specifically - and doubt I have sipped a PEKOE since.
Thanks for finding that date @anonymous 12:42 PM. I just mentioned it in my very late post.
@LES S: My thoughts exactly about the OAT. I really enjoy your posts.
Side as in side dish
Hey @Roo. You’re right on; theme done 9/4/19. I recognized it too but was too lazy to look for it. Thank you @Anon 12:42 - later on down in the posts.
lol
Spot on & Thank You
The easiest Tueday ever, and boy did it feel like it. I actually thought for a while I'd have a chance to break my Monday record, but a few slightly harder areas scotched that.
Post a Comment