Thursday, February 19, 2026

Courting disaster, slangily / THU 2-19-26 / Spot to play baccarat / Medieval cure-all / Metaphor for a challenging puzzle / Japanese word that's sometimes translated as "planted in a pot" / Australian actor Eric / One-half of a golf partnership

Constructor: John Ewbank

Relative difficulty: Easy

THEME: LESSER OF TWO EVILS (60A: Better choice, given the options ... or the circled squares vis-à-vis the shaded ones?) — theme answers have two "SIN"s (i.e. "evils"): one regular-sized (in the shaded squares), the other shrunken ("lesser") inside a single (circled) square:

Theme answers:
  • CRUISIN' FOR A BRUI[SIN'] (18A: Courting disaster, slangily) / CA[SIN]O (13D: Spot to play baccarat)
  • SING[S IN] THE SHOWER (29A: Uses a shampoo bottle as a microphone, perhaps) / SAS[SIN]G (19D: Talking back to)
  • BUSINES[S IN]SIDERS (48A: They may have knowledge of corporate secrets) / RE[SIN] (39D: Varnish ingredient)
Word of the Day: OLGA Kurylenko (58D: Actress Kurylenko) —

Olga Kostyantynivna Kurylenko (born 14 November 1979) is a Ukrainian and French actress and former model. She rose to prominence by playing the Bond girl Camille Montes in the James Bond film Quantum of Solace (2008).

Kurylenko began her career modelling in Paris before making a transition to acting. She had her breakthrough role in the action thriller Hitman (2007) after making her film debut in the drama The Ring Finger (2005). Following Quantum of Solace, she went on to star in the romantic drama To the Wonder (2012), the crime comedy Seven Psychopaths (2012), the science fiction film Oblivion (2013), the political satire The Death of Stalin (2017), the comedy The Man Who Killed Don Quixote (2018), the superhero films Black Widow (2021) and Thunderbolts* (2025), the Netflix spy thriller miniseries Treason (2022) and the action thriller Extraction 2 (2023). (wikipedia)

• • •

Father forgive me, for I have sinned. Twice! One of them was pretty small, though, so ... We good? Awesome, thanks. I liked this puzzle for a few reasons. First of all, I like a good rebus puzzle, and this was a really original rebus variant. Shaded squares + rebus! Two puzzle types that (apparently) taste great together. I liked how the theme unfolded for me, with the "SIN" in the shaded squares going right in no problem, but then the circled square remaining more mysterious for a bit. At first I thought there was some kind of loop or wormhole in effect. Since the first themer ends with the circled square, I thought maybe I was supposed to loop back to the first (shaded-square) "SIN" to complete the answer. The next one didn't work that way, though: if I loop back to the first "SIN" when I hit the circle, I get SING-SINGS THE SHOWER, which obviously makes no sense (unless you are turning your shower into a notorious New York prison). The way I figured out what the circled square was doing was by trying to solve the crosses, specifically CASO. "What's a CASO!? Shouldn't it be CASIN... Oh!" Since I had SASSY for 19D: Talking back to, I had missed the "SIN" square on my first attempt to cross it. So ultimately it was CASINO that gave me the full picture of the theme. First time I've ever been grateful to a CASINO for anything—thanks, CASINO! All that was left after that was to understand why I was getting this Mutt & Jeff pair of "SIN"s in every theme answer. And today, the revealer really delivered. I was calling this puzzle "Two Sins, Fat and Thin" in my head, but LESSER OF TWO EVILS is definitely better. I love when a revealer is a perfect expression of the theme gimmick—or the theme gimmick is a perfect expression of the revealer, whichever. The theme answers get weaker as they go along, opening very strong and closing somewhat feebly (hard to get excited about BUSINESS INSIDERS), but they all work just fine. So, good job today, themewise. 


The rest of the grid is harder to assess. Or rather, I'm a little ambivalent about it. On the one hand, it is admirably clean. It's got its share of tired repeaters (PSST ETRE SSN TKO BANA ALI NSA ITO etc.) but in that 6-7-8 range it's got mostly solid, real words—nothing to gripe about at all. But also not a lot to cheer. Not a lot to sit up and clap for. TOUGH NUT is indeed a metaphor ("a tough nut to crack"), but not one I would use, and it's kinda weird on its own, divorced from the metaphor. ACES HIGH is good—maybe the best non-theme thing in the grid. I don't care for CASINOs, but that doesn't mean I can't appreciate ACES HIGH! After that, though, there's SEA BEDS, IGNEOUS, BONSAI, GALLONS, WRITERS, PAUPER, "NO GOOD!" ... these are all perfectly fine words / phrases, and they make for a really smooth solving experience (hurray), but there's nothing that really stands out, and the clues simply aren't helping. This is true for the whole puzzle: the cluing was quite bland and straightforward. Perhaps the thought was that the theme was (somewhat) tricky, and so the clues on the regular fill shouldn't be? I dunno. I could've used more tricky, or at least clever, or at least interesting like the SSN clue (29D: You can request a new one on religious grounds if it contains "666": Abbr.). If you look the clues over, you'll see that it's mostly phoned-in, boilerplate stuff. I've been known to complain about an overabundance of "?" clues in puzzles, but this one doesn't attempt even one!? No wait, sorry, there is 54A: Big beginning? (MEGA), but that was transparent—not exactly original or twisty. Not a TOUGH NUT! I needed tougher (or at least cleverer) nuts in the fill clues. But again, the fill itself is largely solid. Maybe workmanlike, but it's doing its job—helping showcase the theme by not being a hellish distraction.


Bullets:
  • 51D: Medieval cure-all (LEECH) — this one was a little tough. It was the "cure-all" that got me. I knew LEECHes were used medicinally (as they are today), but the "cure-all" part I was not aware of. Is anything used to treat a wide range of illnesses a "cure-all"? It's the "all" that's throwing me. But LEECHes did have a lot of (supposed) applications in the Middle Ages:
In medieval and early modern European medicine, the medicinal leech (Hirudo medicinalis and its congeners H. verbanaH. troctina, and H. orientalis) was used to remove blood from a patient as part of a process to balance the humors that, according to Galen, must be kept in balance for the human body to function properly. (The four humors of ancient medical philosophy were blood, phlegmblack bile, and yellow bile.) Any sickness that caused the subject's skin to become red (e.g. fever and inflammation), so the theory went, must have arisen from too much blood in the body. Similarly, any person whose behavior was strident and sanguine was thought to be suffering from an excess of blood. Leeches, by removing blood, were thought to help with these kinds of conditions — a wide range which included illnesses like polio and laryngitis. (wikipedia)
  • 24A: One-half of a golf partnership, perhaps (PRO) — if there's one thing I don't care for, besides CASINOs, it's golf. What the hell is a "golf partnership," I wondered for a second or two, Then I remembered that PRO-Am tournaments existed. Professional + amateur. There's your partnership. 
  • 66A: Some colorful plastic items in the seasonal aisle in the spring (EGGS) — this is almost timely. Semi-timely. The Lenten season began yesterday (Ash Wednesday) and it will end on Easter, the day of colorful plastic eggs! (you fill these with candy, and put them in Easter Egg Baskets for kids, or whomever—such a bizarre ritual for the holiest day on the Christian calendar). 
  • 38A: Makes noise like an electric fan (WHIRRS) — turns out I have no idea what the difference is between one-R WHIR and two-R WHIRR. Turns out there isn't one—WHIRR(S) is just a variant (less common, acc. to merriam-webster dot com)
  • 38D: Dickens and Dickinson (WRITERS) — we're well past the middle of February and I'm still reading Dombey & Son! I started on Jan. 1 but then my blog fundraiser started and then my semester started (lots of other reading to do) and then I visited my daughter and now I have a cold ... and while having a cold might seem like the perfect time to plow through Dickens, I, sadly, have a pile of papers to grade. The goal is to be done by month's end. I'm over 700 pages in now, so ... let's see, that leaves just ... hmm, looks like well over 200 pages to go still. I really love it! It's just ... long. And my copy is falling apart. I had to duct tape it together, but it's still on the verge of disintegration at every moment. 

Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld

[Follow Rex Parker on BlueSky and Facebook and Letterboxd]
=============================
❤️ Support this blog ❤️: 
  • Venmo (@MichaelDavidSharp)]
=============================
✏️ Upcoming Crossword Tournaments ✏️=============================
📘 My other blog 📘:

116 comments:


  1. Way too easy for a Thursday. I would have preferred the "SIN" squares unmarked with the shading added post-solve. For a change I liked it less than @Rex did.
    * * _ _ _

    Overwrites:
    Iud before IVF for the reproductive option at 7D
    Before reading the 3D clue, TOUGH oUT before NUT

    WOEs:
    Actor Eric BANA at 40A
    ORk before ORC for the 56A LoTR servant (gimme a break - it's been over 50 years since I read it)
    Never heard of OLGA Kurylenko but I had the name in place before I saw the clue

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. Yesterday was weirdly hard for me and took twice as long as today's puzzle. I also thought the grid was weak--way too many 3s and 4s for a thursday, which made it dull to solve. If yesterday and today had been switched I think I would have been happier with each. 🤷‍♀️

      Same on IUD/IVF.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:24 AM

      Totally agree -- the I also almost beat my PB for Thursday. Would've loved some challenge since the theme was tight and fun! Also had WOEs at BANA and OLGA

      Delete
    3. Anonymous4:21 PM

      Ditto IUD before IVF
      Cruisin for a Bruisin was fun.
      Rex should start a day without SNL clue scoreboard.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous5:00 PM

      IUD prevents pregnancy. Ivf facilitates it

      Delete
  2. Anonymous6:25 AM

    Agree with @Conrad on the difficulty--almost beat my personal best for a Thursday. And I liked it better than OFL. A smooth solve--but better suited for a Tuesday or Wednesday. I enjoyed the theme, though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9:56 AM

      Agree. Nice puzzle, easy theme, a taste of Wednesday on Thursday. OK by me

      Delete
  3. Rex, Rex, Rex, where’s the outrage? I did like the gimmick even though it was a gimme easy, but the rest of the puzzle offered no resistance whatsoever, finishing in just over half my average Thursday time. Just because there’s a rebus shouldn’t qualify a puzzle for for a place in the Thursday pantheon.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous6:51 AM

    Tuesday difficulty, boring theme- once you figure out one of the themers, the other two are basically automatic. Maybe Rex has been so beaten down by this week's crap puzzles, he was just trying to find something to get excited about.

    ReplyDelete
  5. T.G. Inquisitor6:59 AM

    Mortals Sins and venial sins, it seems.

    I liked this quite a bit - lovely and clever theme. Not terribly challenging for a Thursday, but that was compensated for by the enjoyment.

    Here's what I don't like:
    Monday: shaded cells
    Tuesday: circled cells
    Wednesday: no shade (yay)
    Thursday: circled cells and shaded cells

    Shades and circles are occasionally fine when they are actually needed and add to the puzzle, but not when the purpose seems to be to make the puzzle less challenging. And the frequency with which they are turning up recently makes the puzzle visually resemble more and more the puzzles on diner placemats.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I liked this a lot less than Rex and was surprised that he didn’t pan it - maybe the effects of having that cold? (Sorry you’re sick, Rex!) It was too easy and even the rebus didn’t present any resistence. Also, what makes the circled SINs lesser than the spelled-out ones? I just thought the whole thing was dull and a waste of a Thursday.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  7. Anonymous7:02 AM

    Would’ve loved to see this with different sins - like STRANGERD(anger) maybe.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Fun puzzle but nearly a personal best for a Thursday - the trend continues. Once the trick falls - and it went quick - there’s a lot of free fill to put in. Love the bidirectional rebus.

    The Street Parade

    SINGS IN THR SHOWER was the highlight along with the spanning revealer - although given its placement it became an afterthought. Overall well filled.

    The Fountain Of Salmacis

    The longish downs were top notch - IGNEOUS, SEA BEDS, TOUGH NUT. Didn’t know BANA or OLGA - crosses were fair. Learned BONSAI.

    Richmond Fontaine

    Highly enjoyable Thursday morning solve - sorry that it was over so quickly.

    ACES back to back

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yay, I finally discerned a Thursday theme on my own and finished the grid (and enjoyed doing so!). The only tough spots were the propers (BANA is a good example).

    Fortunately (for me at least) this one was consistent with the new era of “easier” puzzles we’ve moved into, which I’m much more comfortable with. That may sound a little bizarre, but since I’m so bad at trivia and PPP, and with about 30+% gunk on a daily basis, I’m pretty much conceding one out of every three “gunk” entries that isn’t outright crosswordese (such as the Teri GARR’s of CrossWorld). So, no complaints from me today - glad to see that Rex was generous with that extra half a star as well.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I had SIN inside the rebus circles and that worked too.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Andy Freude7:31 AM

    I hesitated a moment at TOUGH NUT because I’ve always heard the expression as “a hard nut to crack.” That led me down in interesting Ngram rabbit hole. The “hard nut” has been in use since 1845, peak use in 1920. The “tough nut” first appears in 1910, quickly becomes as common as the hard nut, then becomes much, much more in use from 1940 to 1960. From about 1970 to now, the two terms run neck and neck.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Frifly easy, in an old fashioned way. This must be the week for 16-wides. No shaded squared for me ... and I wish there had not been circles. Still, overall a fun solve.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree that it would have been a bit funner without the hints of shading and circling. Part of the dumbing down?

      Delete
  13. I love the first-class constructor’s mind that came across the everyday phrase LESSER OF TWO EVILS, immediately (I imagine) wondered if a puzzle theme could be made with it, then came up with this primo idea with its perfect punchline. Bravo, sir!

    The theme not only does its job well, but it also gives the puzzle freshness, with all four theme answers being NYT debuts. Not only did John have to juggle grayed squares, circles, and rebuses, but he got those theme answers to fit symmetry, and on top of all this, he filled the box with a clean answer set. Bravo again!

    I enjoyed coming across lovely answers – WHIRRS, BLIP, TOUGH NUT, BONSAI – during the fill-in, and I chef-kissed when I uncovered the revealer.

    I liked the liquid-y subtheme: ARK, KEG, SHOWER, SOAKED, LEECH, THIRST, GALLONS, SEABEDS. As well as the HISS subtheme, with seven answers containing double SS’s.

    Much sweetness in the box today, and thank you for sparking my day, John!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Carolbb10:19 AM

      Loved your synopsis of the puzzle. Chuckling over the chef's kiss 💋!
      I had one silly mistake, liege for Bishop(47d) which left me scratching my head at Lecos river(47a). When I was able to look at it as a game of chess rather than a royal title, it became clear. I too appreciated the theme.

      Delete
  14. That was close to my personal best for a thursday. So a little too easy.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hey All !
    Pretty neat puz. Took a sec to see it was a Rebus. Got it, as Rex, at CASINO.

    16 wider again today, plus circles And shaded squares! All your features (bugs?) in one puz.

    Strange clue for ATOM. Had ATeM until finally figuring out the TOUGHNUT. Puz didn't BLOW, nothing to HISS at. I CAN respect THAT.

    For less than a 900 page book, get mine at only 125 pages! Changing Times by Darrin Vail. Grab it wherever you get your books online.

    Have a great Thursday!

    Two F's
    RooMonster
    DarrinV

    ReplyDelete
  16. Didn't understand the SIN/SIN aspect, but it didn't matter because one blank had to be a rebus for BUSINESSINSIDERS to work. Overall, easy by Thursday standards.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The only minor hold up for me was the first themer--would it be CRUISINGFORABRUISING or CRUISINFORABRUISIN? It was the latter, which meant CASINO. Then, would it be the same trick over and over? It would. Maybe a wheelhouse thing but it was pretty much "read the clue, fill in the answer" all the way to OLGA which was obvious from crosses. Would very much prefer more of a challenge on Thursday, usually one of my favorite days Usually.

    Nice work on finding the recurring SINS, JE, but Jarringly Easy. Thanks for some fun at least.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous8:32 AM

    Easier than yesterday’s puzzle even though I had to guess 18 across.I loved this puzzle.🎈🎈🎊🎊

    ReplyDelete
  19. I have a letter in today's NYT. If you get the paper, I hope you'll read it there. If you don't, but you do have access to the Times online, here's the link

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Outstanding!!

      Delete
    2. Well said and amen!

      Delete
    3. Anonymous9:14 AM

      So you indignantly “left” this blog but you’ll return for self-promotion? Self-promotion with absolutely no crossword relevance? Fascinating.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous9:31 AM

      I support your position but don't understand your promoting it on this blog, a blog in which you don't participate anymore.

      Delete
    5. Great letter, Nancy. Brava!

      Delete
    6. I’m unable to get past the pay wall. Maybe you could cut and paste the text and email it to me?

      Delete
    7. Anonymous10:39 AM

      Mods— what does a letter to the editor have to do with this blog?

      Delete
    8. Thanks, @Nancy, I stand with you!

      Delete
    9. Brava, Nancy! I applaud your message and your courage.

      Delete
    10. @ Anonymous 9:31am 9:14 am
      ‼️ (I kinda agree)

      Delete
    11. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    12. @Nancy 8:33 AM
      Always a delight to see your name (and your byline). You are the unique magic this world offers us far too rarely.

      Less delightful to see the weeping Anonymoti here, but nice to know you're still living in their heads rent free.

      Delete
    13. Minoridreams5:40 PM

      You are missed here. Great letter, thanks for sharing. You are, even in absence, an important part of this community.

      Delete
    14. Minoridreams5:45 PM

      Easiest Thursday ever. I am not a speed solver, but I did this in Monday time.

      Delete
    15. Excellent letter @Nancy, and so well crafted. So glad you dropped in.

      Delete
  20. Thanks, John, for a nice Thursday rebus! I guess the SSN clue was bonus material? Sinners try to ENRICH themselves at CASINOs. SIN is certainly NO GOOD, and then we end with a PSST, as the devil himself tries to get you interested in another temptation.... Nice, pretty straightforward Thursday, easy for me. And where are we now... Is it 4 or 5 days without a starwars clue??? I tell you, Will is listening...

    ReplyDelete
  21. Amazed to learn leeches are still in use for medicinal purposes. My brother-in-law may not be as worthless as everyone thinks.

    ReplyDelete
  22. @Nancy has a letter in today's Times! Here's the link: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/18/opinion/homeland-security-dept-ice.html

    ReplyDelete
  23. No shaded squares in the AcrossLite version, just the circles, which made the rebuses (rebi?) really easy to find, but left me confused about the theme.

    ReplyDelete
  24. David C9:01 AM

    Joan Jett is excellent but not a punk rocker.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9:46 AM

      I agree with you. But. This clue sent me down the rabbit hole. Not too far though as her wikipedia page says she is “often referred” to as “the God Mother of punk rock”. So take that for what it is. We can agree that she is excellent. No debate there.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:13 PM

      Totally agree. She’s not a punk… a rocker, yes…punk, no

      Delete
  25. Estoy a tu disposición.

    Nice. Funny. Although I don't know about the revealer. The second SIN seems less LESSER but more squeeenched and I don't think that's in the Bible. Thou shalt not squeeench.

    In my mind Joan Jett is metal not punk. I used to turn her music up in the 80s and now she plays CASINOS on the outskirts of Albuquerque. Of course every band led by senior citizens does that. Maybe the casinos are nicer than I imagine.

    Speaking of BLOWS, it blowed all day yesterday and it's gunna blow all day tomorrow and I'm blowed out. Stupid blowing. It's the desert, so all this blow is like a sand blaster mixed with tumbleweeds and allergens.

    I think you should be able to rescue the orphaned 666 SSNS and request one with it in it.

    Calling the American ruling class ELITE is like calling chopped liver filet mignon. It's all a murdered cow. Let's call them Dead Elsie.

    People: 9
    Places: 2
    Products: 3
    Partials: 7
    Foreignisms: 3
    --
    Gary's Grid Gunk Gauge: 24 of 79 (30%)

    Funny Factor: 6 😅

    Tee-Hee: ASS. {They're back. 🙄}

    Uniclues:

    1 SS
    2 The ad team at Coke.

    1 HISS CLOSES
    2 THIRST WRITERS

    My Fascinating Crossword Uniclue Keepsake from Last Year: Doting on dot dude. REGALING SEURAT.

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Gary J, it’s blowing out here too. Both my cat and I are suffering from the dust and allergens. It is nutso. If thou shalt not squeench, it goes without saying that thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s squeench. Accordingly, may I borrow with appropriate attribution? That’s a bonzer word, my friend.

      Delete
  26. The duct-taped Dickens reminded me of the time I left a paperback copy of I-don't-remember-what on the floor of my car and it got waterlogged from melting snow. I thought a little time in the oven at a low setting might help it dry out. When I checked it after about a minute it seemed to be working. I'm a genius! It was about half-way to dry. I left it in for a very short while longer after which it looked very dry!! So I turned off the oven, took the book out carefully, and set it on my table where it burst into flames. D'oh! At least I put a whole new spin on "book burning."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That sounds like it’s in the “truth is stranger than fiction” category. I hope you had a fire extinguisher handy and after the fact were able to find some humor in the situation.

      Delete
    2. I haven't burned any books but I have, twice, absentmindedly left a book on the hearth in front of the gas insert fireplace and have come back to find all the binding glue has melted. It's hard to read a book which has the pages falling out.

      Delete
    3. Ha! Luckily, I was able to get it into the sink, so it didn't turn into Mrs. O'Leary's cow. I grudgingly found the humor in it once the smoke cleared.

      Delete
  27. There's some good PHIL at 67A. Beyond that, I'd have to call this the Six Deadly Boring SINs. Even with a wide grid and rebus squares it put up zero resistance and was over before I could even engage in any good slothing. I did get to wrathing a bit once I started this comment. Puzzle actually was good, just on the wrong day. Thanks, John Ewbank.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Agreeing this was waaaaaaaaay too easy. Set a new personal best for Thursday, at 5:01. I was flying through it thinking it might be, et voila. Weirdly, my fastest Friday is 4:16, which is faster than my fastest Wednesday and Thursday. Fun gimmick, but I wanted to struggle juuuuuust a bit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Adrienne 9:30 am: 5:01? Yikes, and I thought my 12 minutes was fast!

      Delete
  29. EasyEd9:34 AM

    I started out thinking this would be a TOUGHNUT to crack, but as soon as I caught the SIN gimmick everything went surpriSINgly fast. Sorry, couldn’t resist. The double R WHIRR threw me a bit but the cross made it certain.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Not that it's gospel, but Joan Jett's Wikipedia discussion says she is "often referred to as the 'Godmother of Punk.'"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wikipedia is most definitely wrong. Without a doubt she is a rocker but she’s not a punk and definitely not Godmother of Punk. There are many other artists from Patti Smith to Debbie Harry to Siouxie Sioux that fall into that category

      Delete
  31. I adore the photo of Dombey and Son. Hope you're well soon, Rex.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I really hated WHIRRS, but I guess I can't argue with Merriam-Webster. I can see that the second R had to be there, since it ends in a circle, and "LESIN" doesn't mean anything, but I still hated it.

    As sfor BUSINESS INSIDERS, the reason it seems awkward is that one would normally say "corporate INSIDERS" but you need a word ening in S there. OK, I'll accept that sacrifice.

    @Rex, I admire your perseverance. Fiftyish years ago, I bought a used copy of Tristram Shandy, but it fell apart beyond the hope of duct tape--individual pages were falling out -- and I never finished, despite loving the book. I finally bought it on Kindle about 6 months ago, but have not yet caught up to where I had left off back then.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I had someone describe Tristram Shandy as hilarious but I struggled to finish. Let me know what you think of the ending!

      Delete
  33. Very surprised that Rex didn’t pan this one. I liked the rebus and the theme concept but when you realize every theme entry is going to have exactly the same trick, there went any challenge there might’ve been. All that’s left was filling in the surrounding blanks which didn’t require much of an effort either. Where’s the beef?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. DAVinHOP1:45 PM

      A bunch of pans today as "too easy". In general, yes; as Rex said, only one "?" clue, and a dead giveaway. Actually the revealer had a "?" but IMO that was inappropriate.

      But that said, once you get the theme, you're at most only getting a couple more letters (the extent to which you have not "committed any SINs"). So if the non-theme aspect of the puzzle had more bite, including fewer three-letter words (22), the responses would have been more in line with Rex at 3-1/2.

      If OFL has never, as indicated, used the expression "TOUGH NUT" to describe a puzzle, I'm throwing a flag on that clue.

      Maybe RFKJR secretly desires us to return to the days of the four humors. Frankly, he's a riot; one down, three to go.

      Delete
  34. Cute idea, neat and tidy execution. Seeing the SIN in CASINO right off helped make this one go fast for me. I liked the dynamism of the top half: JETT, CRUISIN, BLOWS, HISS, WHIRRS and the joy of SINGS IN THE SHOWER; also enjoyed writing in PAUPER, IGNEOUS, and ACES HIGH.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Surprised Rex didn’t insert a YouTube clip from The Simpson’s for “Up and atom!”
    “Up and AT THEM!!!”
    “…..better.”

    ReplyDelete
  36. I would say Jett's most famous stuff, with the Runaways, is just plain rock. But some of her other work is punk.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:18 PM

      No punk would ever sing “i love rock and roll”

      Delete
  37. A couple things I learned, in addition to the fact that WHIRRS can have two r’s (I had initially guessed WHIRLS): WRITERS and AUTHORS have the same amount of letters, the phrase is ACES HIGH (in my head it was “ace is high”).

    ReplyDelete
  38. The puzzles are definitely getting easier. I thought maybe I was just getting to be a better solver, but I've been in the archives doing puzzles from 1999-2000, and they are definitely more challenging.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Anonymous10:28 AM

    If you say all the themers aloud, you will only hear "SIN" once. Try it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hear it twice in cruisin for a bruisin.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:21 AM

      Yep. But too early in the day for a glass of ZIN.

      Delete
    3. @Whatsername 11:09 am, I hear "zin" twice, not "sin".

      Delete
    4. @okanaganer: good point.

      Delete
  40. I really don't want to know what in the body consists of the black bile that needs balancing and how Galen suggested doing so. And yet the mind goes there...

    I was glad that the crosses in the NW were pretty easy in order to get JETT. I knew it without the crosses but I'm sure there's a cross-section of the population who don't know of Joan JETT. Or Lita Ford.

    I missed the "physicist" part of 14A's clue so 3D was a tougher nut to crack than it needed to be. I eventually went back and exchanged the E for the O in ATOM.

    STole before STUNG.

    Thanks, John Ewbank, for an easy yet entertaining Thursday puzzle. Nice theme revealer!

    ReplyDelete
  41. Anonymous10:44 AM

    For [24A: One-half of a golf partnership, perhaps] (PRO) Rex's answer was reasonable, but I wonder if what the author was getting at was a PRO and a caddie.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:48 AM

      I think they were referring to Pro-Am … I’m w Rex on this one.

      Delete
  42. Yep easy, no WOEs and no erasures. I solved almost all of this before I needed to pay attention to the theme.

    “Dickinson” on Apple+ with Hailee Seinfeld is worth a look.

    Amusing, liked it.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Anonymous11:12 AM

    Number of days this week without circles, shaded squares or other silly gimmicks: 0.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Anonymous11:20 AM

    One star. WHIRRS one this week so far.
    NO GOOD. HISS. BLOWS.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Anonymous11:23 AM

    Nancy, your thoughts are outstanding.As a fellow New Yorker, I implore you to return to our blog!!!

    ReplyDelete
  46. Anonymous11:26 AM

    @Megafrim: I agree, I've been doing the same thing. Current/recent puzzles are almost always below my average time (often significantly, e.g., 5:12 today, compared to my 9:48 average time for Thursdays). For me, it was when I got back to around 1998 that I started getting times above my average. Part is in-the-news stuff (I probably would have been much more likely to remember the best foreign film Oscar winner from 1997 in 1998 when the puzzle first appeared than I am to remember it now), but the puzzles definitely also got harder in general. Even when I never really get stuck on an old Sunday puzzle from 1997, it still takes me 1-2 minutes longer to finish it than my current average.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Kate Esq11:31 AM

    I loved Cruisin for a Bruisin so much that I felt very let down by the pedestrian Sings in the Shower and the less than pedestrian bordering on distasteful Business Insiders. :(. Puzzle peaked early for me, and while the revealed was apt it didn’t really sparkle for me.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Anonymous11:32 AM

    Bizarro Rex , please return our michael !

    ReplyDelete
  49. Anonymous11:33 AM

    Uh, it’s “Bless me father, for I have sinned….” The penitent doesn’t demand forgiveness; he confesses his sins with contrition (as opposed to snark) and the priest in persona Christi gives absolution.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Came close - a rebus & circles? I see what I'll be doing today :(

    ReplyDelete
  51. Briefly tried to go with ACES wIld, but the crosses guided me quickly to HIGH.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Anonymous12:36 PM

    I, for one, love that Rex liked it. One of the reasons I've read him for years is he is entirely himself. I appreciate that he manages to write these without (appearing to) bend to the peanut gallery. Sometimes I wish he did just slightly, as for example, I thought he was pretty dismissive of Nancy. The commentariat is very clearly dominated by middle aged white dudes and only becomes more so when someone like Nancy leaves, which lessens the diversity of thought and experience IMO. But I love that Rex is typically empathic while also going with his gut. Just because something is easy, doesn't mean there isn't a lot to admire.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous1:46 PM

      Not that “dismissive” as she’s come back to post on a couple of occasions

      Delete
    2. Anonymous2:11 PM

      so true. good, bad or indifferent Rex tells you how he feels. there is no edit to appease the masses. I dont agree with him lots of times and think he is overly harsh, but so be it. It's his blog.

      Delete
  53. Too easy. Maybe OFL is giving up criticism for Lent?

    ReplyDelete
  54. It was fairly easy, but Across Lite didn't have the shaded squares so I didn't get the theme until I got the revealer and looked at the NYT web page version. It was a fine theme, but as others have said, we are just seeing circles and shaded squares way too much. Once or twice a week would be plenty!

    I had a real dumb typeover at 49 down: "call after a missed field goal" = NO GOAL. Of course, Will seems to be throwing most of the rules out the window, so who knows?

    "Gas units" = GALLONS. Boy, that was a long time ago...50 years since we switched to liters? The gas stations liked it, cuz it delayed them having to upgrade their signs to show 4 digits in the price for many years.

    Lots of names today, but no Unknowns, so it didn't bug me too much. Rex, we need a "0 days without a LOTR clue" counter.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Anonymous1:41 PM

    Day 6 without a Star Wars clue…will we get a full week?

    ReplyDelete
  56. @okanaganer. Um, that's litres.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Les, oh yeah, I keep thinking that's the French spelling but I guess "liter" is the US spelling. (Metre / meter too.) When I see it in print it's usually just "L".

      Delete
  57. Anonymous2:20 PM

    Did anyone else think of the Simpsons with "Up and Atom??"

    ReplyDelete
  58. Anonymous2:48 PM

    Way too easy! Not fun.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Anonymous2:54 PM

    Cool theme, too many proper names!

    ReplyDelete
  60. I liked this puzzle. And I liked Rex's appraisal. Clever theme. Can't say I really have a clear idea what constitutes a SIN. Is there an official list somewhere? Is gambling, as some have intimated, a sin? It can be an addiction and become a vice, certainly. Is a vice a sin? Playing blackjack in a casino can just be an amusement. Are amusements sins? If so, I'm definitely a sinner. And if you are sinning are you really evil? Lotta moral fuzziness in this grid. (Which makes it interesting, actually.)

    Speaking of morality, how does being a BUSINESS INSIDER make you a villain, Rex? I don't like the goings-on of business generally but I'm still not willing to characterize every BUSINESS INSIDER as evil.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was once a bigwig at Mott's Apple Juice. You could say that I was a BUSINESSINSIDER for a business in cider. And I was quite a villain.

      Delete
    2. BTW, I was reviewing the puzzle and entering comments while watching Canada play USA in the gold medal women's Olympic hockey game. It was youth and speed (USA) vs experience and wisdom (Canada) and it was a great game. When they went to OT and the ice opened up (3 on 3), that American youth triumphed. But I don't think I've ever seen a better women's game.

      Watching the medal presentations, I was reminded of something one of my sons once said (yes, I was a "hockey dad"): it feels better to win bronze than lose gold. Watching the medal presentations, you could see joy in the Swiss players (third place) but bitter disappointment in the Canadians. The Americans were exultant. Congrats to them. Long live this great rivalry.

      Delete
    3. Oh, and one more thing ... Rex, you do realize, don't you, that there is clear tape out there. Packing tape would work, or Gorilla Crystal Clear. Show some respect for the cover art.

      Delete
  61. Anonymous4:10 PM

    Nice Thursday - solved without lookups even with all the names. Clever reveal! I didn’t even notice CASINO!
    Insider trading is a big deal btw.
    Good to see you, Nancy!

    ReplyDelete
  62. Anonymous5:45 PM

    Even by the post-monetization standards of the current NYT, this one is a disaster. Barely belongs on a Monday. The USA Today puzzle is probably cheaper and offers a little more resistance

    ReplyDelete
  63. Played a bit easier than the typical Thursday for me but I really enjoyed it. LESSEROFTWOEVILS fell with no letters at all and, like @Rex, it all clicked with CASINO. It was then a lot of fun working out all the themers, though a bit on the easy side as you knew where all the SINs were going to fall.
    I appreciated the unique cluing of SSN - that was refreshing (and educational, who new??!!)
    I agree with @Rex that there was not a whole lot that sparkled and popped but it was all very solid.
    As for Joan JETT, agree that as we think of her in 2026, she was not exactly punk, but I do remember in the late 70s/early 80's we (at least my crowd) didn't know exactly what punk was at the time. Heck we were calling The Go Gos' punk and we gave that tag to Joan as well. Maybe moreso when she was in The Runaways. Anyway, I have no issue with the answer as clued.
    Also appreciated the shaded squares/circle/rebus affair - how can you not be impressed with that??
    Great stuff John, thank you for this!

    ReplyDelete
  64. Invasive beetles youngsters?
    LESSER OF BOLL WEEVILS

    Groaner, I know!

    Roo

    ReplyDelete
  65. Anonymous10:08 PM

    Enjoyed the puzzle. Had a nice flow. Agree with Rex that it was on the easy side.

    ReplyDelete
  66. My favorite clue/answer pair today by long shot is the Medieval cureall?/LEECH. For some reason, I found it hilarious. Probably because I still love The Wizard of ID. I missed posting Monday, so I’m super happy to give it a shoutout today. Honestly, can’t you just see Wiz at his cauldron with a bunch of leeches popping up their leechy little heads as Wiz calls out “What’s up, suckers?”

    I blasted through this so quickly that I didn’t really think about it much. After testing to make sure Joan JETT was the reference at 1A (I don’t think if her as punk, so I thought it could be wrong) I continued with the downs. By the time I hit the first circle I already had the theme figured out.

    Actually, at 29A, I mis-rebused at first by just putting “in” into the circle rather than “SIN” thereby leaving an “s” out of SASSING. That’s what happens when I go too fast; I miss grammar clues. When I corrected, I thought it created a hilarious movie title “SING SING; THE SHOWER.” And that’s all it took. Once the solver sees the trick, it’s over.

    I give the reveal props though. Very clever way to illustrate it. Did we really need the shaded/circle visual clues? It is Thursday, and the puzzle would definitely have pushed back without them.

    Overall, it was a quick but pleasant solve.

    ReplyDelete
  67. RE: SHOD vs. SHOED -- Apparently "shoed" is an alternate spelling, but they're both pronounced SHOD. Kinda like SCROD and . . . uh, never mind.

    ReplyDelete
  68. MetroGnome12:15 PM

    . . . and I still have no idea what the hell a SKU is.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Anonymous3:07 AM

    What is going on with these incredibly easy Sunday puzzles? Last three weeks were not the least bit challenging. Boring. Ruining my favorite Sunday thing

    ReplyDelete