Monday, September 29, 2025

Purchased souvenirs, informally / MON 9-29-25 / Military mind game, for short / Makeup set containing shadow and mascara / Headwear usually worn metaphorically / Loss-prevention command / Soldier who can stand at attention indefinitely / Run out of clothes?

Constructor: Brian Keller

Relative difficulty: Medium to Medium-Challenging (solved Downs-only)


THEME: GREETING CARDS (56A: Hallmark products ... or a hint to what to find in the circled squares) — theme answers have a "greeting" ("HI") and then a (playing) "card" inside them, in circled letters:

Theme answers:
  • CHICKEN TENDER (20A: Fast-food alternative to a nugget)
  • THINKING CAP (28A: Headwear usually worn metaphorically) ("usually"!?!)
  • PHIJACKSON (49A: Coach of Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant)
  • HIGH / FIVE (70A: With 10-Across, alternative to a fist bump)
Word of the Day: FDIC (1D: Bank-backing grp. since 1933) —

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is a United States government corporation supplying deposit insurance to depositors in American commercial banks and savings banks. The FDIC was created by the Banking Act of 1933, enacted during the Great Depression to restore trust in the American banking system. More than one-third of banks failed in the years before the FDIC's creation, and bank runs were common. The insurance limit was initially US$2,500 per ownership category, and this has been increased several times over the years. Since the enactment of the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act in 2010, the FDIC insures deposits in member banks up to $250,000 per ownership category. FDIC insurance is backed by the full faith and credit of the government of the United States, and according to the FDIC, "since its start in 1933 no depositor has ever lost a penny of FDIC-insured funds". (wikipedia)
• • •

Seems like a concept that needed more time to develop. It certainly needed a better, cleaner execution. Why are all the "greetings" the same, while the "cards" are different? I can imagine one with "YO" "'SUP" "HEY" as the greetings, or something along those lines. Repeating "HI" seemed kind of weak and sad. The split themer is really the worst of the lot. First, it's awkward and ungainly to start your two-part answer in the SW and then finish it in the NE. Feels totally assbackward, and it's just plain ugly on the page. Moreover, even if that answer had been pleasingly laid out, it would still be the worst of the lot simply because unlike with the other answers, the "card" is not buried or hidden At All. You see how "TEN" is hidden inside "TENDER," "KING" inside "THINKING," "JACK" inside "JACKSON" ... that's how you do it. Having a themer where "FIVE" is just "FIVE" makes this answer even more inelegant than it already was, given its horrid layout. And then there's "FIVE" passing itself off as a "card" at all. I mean, yes, technically "FIVE" is a card, but using a numbered card feels like a copout. Arbitrary. You could've used FOUR? SEVEN? The "card"ness of the numbered cards just doesn't come through as strongly. I think ideally you need just face cards. I can't believe there wasn't an "ACE" answer to be had. For some reason TEN rankles way less than FIVE. "TEN" feels like it's up there with the strong cards, whereas FIVE feels ridiculous. So while the core idea is kind of zany and interesting (literalizing GREETING CARDS like that), the execution is less interesting, and HIGH / FIVE in particular feels like a dealbreaker. Unpleasant in multiple ways. I'm not even sure why you need that themer. You'd've been fine with just the three and then rather than sequester HIGH and FIVE in tiny corners, maybe build a more interesting grid overall, one that isn't so choppy (42 black squares = high) and has room for some longer, more interesting fill instead of all this 3-4-5 junk.

["Hi there!"]

Cluing felt harder than usual, for a Monday. Usually I can get most shorter answers very quickly when solving Downs-only, but today my progress consistently felt patchy and uneven, with very few sections that I could tear right through. The NW was the worst section for me to get through, and ended up being the last I finished. At the very end, I was staring at this ... and wasn't sure I was going to be able to finish:


I just could not get my head around what "Purchased" was doing in this clue (4D: Purchased souvenirs, informally). "'Purchased?' ... well, of course souvenirs are purchased, how the hell else are you supposed to get your souvenirs? Steal them?" The clue looked like a plural, but if I put an "S" at the end, it looked very wrong (---CS). After "S," the only other letter that seemed like it would fit after the "C" that would also make a good first letter for -IC was "T," but ---CT wasn't giving me [Purchased souvenirs] either. At some point I realized "H" could work. I'd wanted the [Makeup set containing shadow and mascara] to be EYE KIT (?!), but for some reason when I put in EYE, I couldn't infer the Acrosses in a way that seemed right, so I hesitated. But once I tried the "H" at the end of 4D: Purchase souvenirs, informally, I tried EYE KIT again and was able to infer MERCH from there. 


Other parts of the puzzle didn't stop me cold like that, but it was often pretty slow going. Cluing seemed off a lot of the time. [Covered in water] is a standalone phrase in a way that AWASH is not. The only time I ever hear AWASH is followed by the preposition "in," because AWASH does not, by itself, imply "water." Which is to say, I mostly encounter the word when it's being used metaphorically. My blogging and word processing software mostly auto-saves everything I type, so I forgot SAVE ALL was actually a thing (45D: Loss-prevention command). I thought "Twilight" and "The Hunger Games" were FANTASY. Since the grown-ass adult reading population consumed those books so voraciously, I forgot they were aimed specifically at "teens." I totally blanked on Djokovic's first name, which felt awful, since I've known it for years. I could only think of "the JOKER," which is his nickname, I think, though maybe that's spelled "DJOKER?" I didn't know G.I. JOEs could stand at all, let alone "at attention indefinitely" (40D: Soldier who can stand at attention indefinitely). My experience with most action figures as a kid was they weren't really made to stand up. Their legs were too ... articulated. That VOL. clue was initially one of the worst for me (12D: Button on a remote: Abbr.); I wanted REW or REC because I wanted the circled squares up there in the NE to spell out "FIRE!" Felt so ... right. So ... thematic. But no.


Bullets:
  • 25D: Military mind game, for short (PSY OP) — just one "OP?" Feels odd. Also, feels very odd to have "OP" in the puzzle twice (52A: Photo ___ (media events) (OPS)).
  • 20A: Fast-food alternative to a nugget (CHICKEN TENDER) — No, the "alternative to a nugget" is a TENDER. Those are the equivalent terms: "nugget" and "TENDER." It's not that it was hard to guess CHICKEN here (in fact, since it's an Across answer, I never saw the clue), but the clue is poorly written, on a grammatical level. You can't introduce CHICKEN in the answer while leaving out all things chickeny in the clue. The "alternative" to a nugget is a "tender"; the alternative to a chicken nugget is a CHICKEN TENDER. There are other types of nuggets, after all.
  • 8D: Run out of clothes? (STREAK) — a very good "?" clue, but pretty tough on a Monday when I'm getting no assistance from crosses. Even when I got STREAK it took me a few seconds to realize it was referring to running naked. I thought maybe the colors had "run" in your laundry, causing them to STREAK.
That's it. See you next time.

Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld

[Follow Rex Parker on BlueSky and Facebook and Letterboxd]
=============================
❤️ Support this blog ❤️: 
  • Venmo (@MichaelDavidSharp)]
=============================
✏️ Upcoming Crossword Tournaments ✏️
=============================
📘 My other blog 📘:

76 comments:

  1. Bob Mills6:11 AM

    For once I found the puzzle much easier than Rex did. Ignored the theme, albeit I did see the link between "Hi" and "GREETING" in passing. I've now done enough NYT crosswords to infer street language like ATTA, DUDE, and YADIG.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:41 AM

      Wholeheartedly agree

      Delete
    2. Bob, I’m not sure but since Rex now always does “downs only” on Monday, I think he rates the difficulty based on that.

      Delete
    3. Bob Mills
      Atta boy, atta girl Usually said to preschoolers who (say) catch a ball (also dogs being trained). It is anything but street language I am sure you came across it in the Times puzzle as it is often appearing crosswordese. Very helpful letters
      Ya dig if it hippy era slang. Dude is even older. They may have started as street language but for different reasons I wouldn’t call either that now.

      Delete
  2. Mike in Santa Monica6:22 AM

    @Rex, the HI FIVE split may have been an awkward pun on HIgh FIVE, and thus the FIVE was high(er) than the HI and the other cards, to boot. At least, that's the best explanation I could come up with for the otherwise strange choice.

    Fortunately, I got MERCH quickly, so this was a medium downs-only Monday for me, maybe even a bit on the easy side.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mike in Santa Monica6:42 AM

      Further support for the HIgh FIVE theory is that the HI in the bottom left is hidden within HIGH. But then why are there only four card themers? If there were five, the HIGH/HI FIVE would be a second revealer; the puzzle would work in both the greeting card and the "up top" way.

      If you want to really stretch your mind at 3:41 a.m. Pacific, think about the state abbreviations. HI FIVE-O, anybody?

      Delete
  3. Tom F6:33 AM

    I knew almost immediately this one wasn’t ready for prime time but this was confirmed by the baffling OP dupe and chicken incongruence. HIJACK is not particularly pleasant either.

    But we are saved by the great Nathalie Merchant!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree on both points, and especially about Hi JAck. In today’s chaotic environment it just seems an unnecessary word to have in a crossword puzzle.

      Delete
    2. Tom F
      Op dupe
      Dupes do not bother me but I understand that a lot of commenters hate dupes. Generally Rex agrees. But he says he doesn’t complain unless they are egregious ( his word) because there are so many. There is NO current rule against dupes in the Times puzzle so the constructors shouldn’t be criticized for them.
      I thought it was a decent puzzle.

      Delete
  4. Anonymous6:38 AM

    Psyop as a singular is a term I've seen a lot online over the past couple of years.

    Didn't enjoy this puzzle. Had the same feelings as you did about the theme. An idea that could have been fun, but was lazily executed.

    ReplyDelete
  5. My five favorite original clues from last week
    (in order of appearance):

    1. Didn't get broken (4)(5)
    2. Takes in the trash? (7)(6)
    3. In need of an evening out? (7)
    4. They go from season to season (5)(4)
    5. Clown around with food? (8)


    HELD SERVE
    DELETED SCENES
    CREASED
    STORY ARCS
    MCDONALD

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My favorite encore clues from last week:

      [What's heard exactly twice in a lifetime?] (4)(1)
      [The works?] (6)


      LONG I
      OEUVRE

      Delete
  6. Andy Freude6:48 AM

    Easy-medium. Loved the [Run out of clothes?] clue!

    ReplyDelete
  7. ¡Vamos chica! ¿Me entiendes?

    Happy Monday. Here we go. I just now got the circles joke on the puzzle and I laughed out loud. "Hi Jack!" Sooooo silly I love it. That is exactly what you'd say when GREETING CARDS.

    Slower Monday for me, but I blame the TV. I should turn it off when doing a puzzle. Sadly, I probably found the glowing cube of dumbness more interesting than this puzzle or maybe the puzzle was a skosh more fussy than usual or more likely I left the screen on while walking out back to see the moon and the dramatic sky at sunset last night. We've been getting some rain and our sunsets here are epic when there's weather wandering around, so who cares if the puzzle is good or bad. When you're facing a waxing moon, lightning in the distance, orange and purple cascading over long dead volcanoes, and feisty clouds lolling around like a pretty girl's hairdo, you just don't care if grokking SAVEALL is gonna take awhile.

    PHIL JACKSON was an amazing leader. I don't pay attention to many coaches in any sport, but I found him riveting.

    People: 6
    Places: 1
    Products: 9
    Partials: 6
    Foreignisms: 1
    --
    Gary's Grid Gunk Gauge: 23 of 78 (29%)

    Funny Factor: 3 😐

    Tee-Hee: DAMN. STREAK.

    Uniclues:

    1 Red itchy reaction to selling t-shirts to Comic-Con-ers.
    2 How to make soldiers look pretty.
    3 Mead.

    1 MERCH GIRL RASH
    2 GI JOE EYE KIT
    3 DANE'S NECTAR

    My Fascinating Crossword Uniclue Keepsake from Last Year: Amp up the swim party. FEEL NYLON SPEEDO.

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Loved your description of walking out to look at the sky. Good thing to do, even if it slows your solve time down.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:10 AM

      I’d be more convinced of Phil Jackson’s coaching bona fides if he had ever won a title without a guy named Jordan or Kobe on his roster.

      Delete
    3. AND guys like Pippen, Rodman, Kukoç and Kerr or Shaq, Fisher, Horry and Malone

      Delete
    4. Anonymous3:52 PM

      Karl
      Amen

      Delete
  8. Wonderfully sweet theme – I thought of a very young kid looking at cards and saying hello to them.

    I also thought of a card player looking at the hand they're holding, seeing desired cards, and, happily surprised, inwardly saying hi to them one by one.

    So, I was totally charmed. Quirky and lovely theme, and, given that this is a debut NYT puzzle, I’m excited to see more from the mind that came up with it!

    Myself, a palindrome fan, I didn’t actually say hi to the four in the grid – two 3s, a four, and a five (ONO, ALA, ATTA, REFER) – but it was the same hello feeling, increasingly happily surprised as each new one turned up.

    Brian, I admire your persistence at continuing to submit puzzles even after 13 NYT rejections, and am very happy to hear that there are more to come. I loved this puzzle – thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous7:07 AM

    The clue on 20A is wrong/backward: A nugget is a fast-food alternative to a tender. Tender is an actual cut of meat; nuggets are pressed together forms or smaller scraps.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @rex -- From the constructor's notes: "This theme originally started with the GREETING CARDS revealer and envisioned different synonyms for hello, with HIJACK and YOKING looking promising, before shifting to focus on strong phrases that hide both HI and the card name."

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hilariously hard for a Monday. Hardest in at least three years. Would be on the hard side for a Tuesday. And to top it off, I had absolutely no idea what the theme was, until a surprisingly long post-solve ponder.

    ReplyDelete
  12. EasyEd7:23 AM

    As I write this it finally dawns on me why the FIVE is HIGH. A counter-intuitive clue if ever there was one. Nicely done, even if not to everyone’s taste. Was relatively easy to get the long themers, but some of the clues were on the tough side for a Monday, at least for me. On balance, liked the puzzle.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Word-nerd post alert – re NECTAR.

    Looks like it should end with an AR-as-in-TAR sound, but actually ends with ER as in HER.

    I wondered if there were more examples, came up with a couple (MORTAR, SOLAR), went online and found a ton more – ALTAR, TARTAR, SIMILAR, VULGAR, REGULAR, PECULIAR, CIRCULAR, POPULAR, PARTICULAR, FAMILIAR, SINGULAR, CELLULAR, ANGULAR, SECULAR, and LUNAR.

    But why, I wondered? ChatGPT said that many of these words had the “ahr” sound in Latin, and English kept the spelling, even as the pronunciation shifted over the centuries. Why did the pronunciation shift? Because in English, unstressed syllables often get reduced to the schwa sound, and thus that “ahr” sound became “er”.

    You’re welcome.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Hey All !
    Wasn't HI JACK some spoofy scene in an Airplane! movie? I know it was in some movie, but the ole brain is blanking on which one. It's basically, someone is at an airport, sees a friend, says "Hi, Bill (or whatever name)" and Bill looks over, and says "HI JACK!", and security promptly tackles him and takes him away.

    Would've been cool to get a Hi QUEEN in somehow. Maybe SHIP QUEEN ANNE? Google tells me it's a Pinnacle-class cruise ship operated by Cunard Lines that debuted in 2024. Maybe you've heard of it? Goes to Iceland.

    Do women have an actual EYE KIT, or is that a general thing for any eye makeup kit? Like a shave kit. I know women have about 88,000 choices of all kinds of makeup. I'm surprised y'all don't spend a million dollars trying to find the right shades, combos, etc.

    CVS with exact same clue here and The Mini. Weird. STREAK a funny clue. Never understood the need to run around nekked. For women, it's fine, but for men, it invites many, let's say, opinions. Har. Unless you're doing good down there, you might just get laughed at for more than the actual running around naked. 😁

    Anyways, puz starts out with an F. Score! That's AOK with me.

    Have a great Monday!

    Three F's
    RooMonster
    DarrinV

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous7:47 AM

    “Purchased souvenirs” (MERCH) contrasted with “Free souvenirs” (SWAG) which you wouldn’t have seen if you didn’t look at the across clues.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Anon 7:47 am; good point. Downs only meant I never saw that clue.

      Delete
    2. @Anon 7:47 AM. Exactly! I think your observation is exactly why @Rex clearly never understood the word “purchased” as an adjective describing souvenirs paid for as opposed to SWAG, the type one receives gratis.

      Delete
  16. I struggled with this one a little bit - was thinking it seemed more difficult than the usual Monday morning fare, which Rex seemed to confirm, although it’s hard to tel from his review since he doesn’t read half of the clues.

    I didn’t even bother with the silly circles - reading OFL confirmed that I didn’t miss anything.

    ReplyDelete
  17. waryoptimist9:08 AM

    Did this puzzle with a lip curl as I imagined OFL trashing the theme. Didn't bother me at all, except for the HIGH at the bottom of the puzzle instead of top right with FIVE.
    Pretty good Monday with creative answers and upbeat feel. Appreciate it Brian

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous9:23 AM

    Did it bother anyone else that hiking and hijack are actual words but hi-ten and hi-five are not (unless you add extra letters to hi-ten, while the extra letters in hi-five are already there in the answer)?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous2:22 PM

      Anonymous 9:23 AM
      I noticed about hi- jack vs hi-ten. etc.
      But it didn’t bother me. Differences or anomalies like that do not bother me. I thought the theme was fine.

      Delete
  19. Man to Egyptian god sitting in a window seat next to an empty aisle seat: OSIRIS that seat taken?

    A stylish way for Lex Luthor to kill Superman's alter ego would be a CHICKENTENDER.

    Mrs. Egs: Did you notice the oral dupe of ICARE crossing EYEKIT?
    Me: Aye

    I was never great with articles. On that portion of the grammar test I just got AOK.

    The silliness of this kinda grew on me as I contemplated it. Thanks and congrats, Brian Keller.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Agree with others that this was a tougher than usual Monday, which is OK occasionally,,, but I missed my Monday whoosh. Oh well. My problem with the theme was that I could imagine saying Hi Jack and even Hi King, but Hi ten? Hi five? Uh, no.

    Those of us with young children or grandchildren have extensive experience with the CHICKENTENDER, so that was a gimme. Took me too long to remember PHILJACKSON, who I will always remember as the coach who forgot to take the coat hanger out of his suit jacket before he put it on. Great coach though.

    Interesting idea, BK, But Kind of silly to imagine someone actually GREETINGCARDS. Thanks for a medium amount of fun.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Somehow he had that same coat hanger in his tank top jersey as a player:)

      Delete
    2. Yep I noticed that too.

      Delete
    3. LOL, guys. So true, especially the mental image I had of the coat hanger in his jersey!

      Delete
  21. I enjoyed this as a downs-only solve in spite of a few things.

    I don’t usually complain about repetitions in my puzzle if they are of the “opt to/run to” variety but 25D PSY OP (singular?) and 52A photo OPS was a bit much.

    5D EYE KIT? Really? You would go to the makeup counter and ask for an EYE KIT?

    At 6D gee, what could be stronger than “Shucks!”? I say DAMN all the time. Shucks sounds weird enough to me to actually catch my attention. I’m AGOG.

    Liked 56D GANG and it was my first thought but I somehow read the clue as Jets AND Sharks and wanted a plural at first and, though I didn’t have to deal with it in my D-O solve, I thought DICEY for Touch-and-go at 14A was kind of nice.

    It was bit difficult to infer the theme solving D-O. I had HI JACK and HI KING and was parsing them as each a singlel word. Then I got HI TEN and thought it must be wrong. So I started to work everything that crossed what had to be the revealer and … big dope slap. Second concussion in the last week. Have to stop overthinking these things. Didn’t even see HI FIVE.

    64D POI. On my last visit to Hawaii a large group of us decided to attend one of those lavishly presented luaus. Having seen POI in my puzzles many times but never having encountered it in real life, I asked one of the servers if it was available. He seemed taken aback. “Why?” he asked. “I’d just like to try it”, I replied. He nodded and disappeared only to return a couple of minutes later with a saucer piled up with white gloop. He watched while I tasted it and then asked if I liked it. “Not exactly my fave,” I answered. Even though he had not actually told me so he gave me an “I told you so” nod and wandered off. A few people near me asked what was going on, what was this stuff and, after I explained that it was apparently a staple in traditional Polynesian cuisine, a bunch of folks wanted to try it. The consensus: we’d all eaten better paste in kindergarten art class.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Another LOL for me, @Les S!!! I will never forget the taste of the grade school paste that came in the squat jars with the brush attached to the lid so you could spread it on the project du jour!

      Delete

  22. Medium. No real WOEs but I needed crosses for PHIL JACKSON, NOVAK, GI JOE, OSIRIS, and YA DIG.

    I’m inclined to agree with @Rex on this one.

    Croce Solvers - Croce’s Freestyle #1049 was an easy Croce for me (a tad less than 2X a Saturday NYT) with the top half tougher than the bottom. Good luck!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We are definitely on different Croce wavelengths lately. I had no idea (and guessed incorrectly) on the 9A/10D cross. But even before that it was tough, with a lot of imprecise, in some cases I'd say unfair, cluing.

      Delete
  23. To start off, 69-A is an outright error. AVEDA makes hair-care products, not "skin products" as in the clue. Maybe the puzzled was thinking of Aveeno, but that wouldn't fit anyway. And while TEEN LIT makes sense, I don't think I've ever heard that genre called anything but "young adult," or more commonly YA.

    But the non-flour, non-partial clue for ATTA was nice, as was the evocation of West Side Story.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I looked it up: AVEDA also makes skin care products. I'm sure you're right though that they're better known for their hair care products.

      Delete
    2. AVEDA makes both but I DO tend to associate them with hair care.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous1:16 PM

      I believe it is your comment that “AVEDA makes hair-care products, not "skin products" as in the clue.” is the outright error. A cursory visit to their website confirms otherwise.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous1:18 PM

      Aveda has as many skin-care products as it does hair-care products.

      Delete
  24. Definitely harder than the usual Monday. Don't know yet if I appreciate that since I normally don't like puzzles with 'circles' anyway.
    The only good thing was that this puzzle made me go SLOW so no typos.
    A nice outing, Brian & congrats on your debut :)

    ReplyDelete
  25. I posted my previous comment too soon. I meant to add that it was outrageous to expect me to know the name of a basketball coach, especially when he was clued only by the names of two players, not a team. I needed every cross except the A for that one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jberg

      Usually I am terrible with coaches’ names. Just not that into sports. But once it was obvious it was PHIL. then JACKSON popped into my head And it worked of course I had no idea who the coach was from the clue (so it was essentially famous pro coach of the past). .I don’t think it was an unfair clue

      Delete
  26. I enjoyed the theme's whimsy, and I appreciated having the pattern of HI plus a CARD when I got to the basketball coach...PHIL what-was-it-again? Ah, JACKson, of course. It was also fun to get the reveal uncrossed: it had to be some kind of CARDS, but I'd been understanding HI as a shortened form of "high"....so, suddenly getting that it was instead a GREETING was another sort of high for this solver. And I loved being reminded of the old timey THINKING CAP.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Forgot to mention re the MERCH/SWAG thing: you can purchase promotional MERCH or accept promotional SWAG, but you can also maybe just pick up a rock along a river or a pressable leaf along a forest trail.

    ReplyDelete
  28. For anyone wanting a challenging puzzle, the NYer today is a doozy, at least for me.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Anonymous12:11 PM

    Tough for a Monday

    ReplyDelete
  30. I pretty much agree with everything @Rex said and while the puzzle was pleasurable enough to solve, the theme was just “okay.” Haha, says the woman who never constructed a puzzle OR spent one second of time thinking up a “theme.”
    I was pleased as punch to immediately put in PHILJACKSON. I guess it’s because I kinda sorta really didn’t like him and I’m sure I had no good reason for this other than his Bulls and Lakers had so much talent AND they kept beating MY team. I had fairly recently learned that he had a sort of holistic “zen” approach in his coaching derived from his reading Pirsig’s Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. That is a book I TRIED reading (on my own) in college and was no doubt still too shallow and immature to understand OR enjoy OR derive any meaning from.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bob Mills4:03 PM

      Thanks for your input. You're probably right that Rex was rating it based on "downs only."

      Delete
    2. I seem to recall enjoying Pirsig's book when I first read it, but I can't remember much of it. Perhaps that's one I should re-read for all the reasons you mentioned.

      Delete
    3. Pirsig's book is pretty damned interesting and thought-provoking, if you like pondering philosophical conundrums -- I should reread it myself.

      I was living in Chicago during the glory years of the 90's, and was definitely on Team Bulls. I must have overlooked the coat hanger inside PHIL JACKSON's sport coat though. I'm guessing... maybe like the Stevie Van Zandt character in The Sopranos, who always looks like he's in mid-shrug.

      Delete
  31. The Sailor is aghast at OFL's assertion that 'AWASH does not, by itself, imply "water."'

    "Covered with water" is, in fact, the precise meaning of AWASH, at least in non-tidal waters (in tidal waters, it more precisely means "alternately covered and exposed by the rising and falling tide).

    I will grant that non-mariners are much more likely to encounter the word used metaphorically. But still.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I agree with Rex that the execution was both blah and incoherent in places. I'm surprised if this is the best the NYTXW has on offer for a Monday. The rating Medium to Medium-Challenging also seems about right for today.

    I never stopped to THINK before about THINKING CAP and what a dumb phrase that is. I was hoping there was an interesting back story for it, but didn't find much. The most interesting suggestion is that it may be have been counterpart to dunce cap, and there the story does get somewhat more interesting. Dunce cap is traced to Duns Scotus, a 13th-14th century theologian and philosopher, who apparently did believe in a sort of thinking cap, "that the shape of a pointed hat would funnel knowledge from the outside world into the mind, and it would then spread throughout the brain". His followers (called Dunsmen) took to wearing these hats. But by the time of the Renaissance, people had begun to regard his doctrines as hilariously outmoded, and the meaning of "Duns cap" eventually morphed into its opposite.

    ReplyDelete
  33. SharonAK1:00 PM

    The last theme was my favorite because Hi Five went high. Thought it cute.
    But not until I came here and got the explanation did I even notice it. Had no idea what the theme was as I was doing the puzzle. In fact I'm wondering if I even finished the puzzle last night. Maybe not.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Yow, kind of a messy Monday. My down clues only solve stalled at the finish line: for 9 down I had TEEN FIC (for "fiction"). Oops!

    I thought the theme was pretty uneven. HI/KING and HI/JACK would go beautifully with QUEEN and ACE. TEN... sure, but FIVE?... no way. And what on earth is HI TEN?... googles it... high tension? Really?

    I too got NOVAK Djokovic's name wrong, putting in ZORAN. But I have a good excuse, as my friend Zoran lives in Zagreb. When I was there in 1987, those republics were all in one country (but not for long).

    ReplyDelete
  35. The silliness of actually GREETING CARDS took me back to when my Gran, a wily card player, taught me to play “Go Fish.” I wasn’t even in school yet. She played canasta with a gaggle of women - serious all. I begged to learn but was so young that I couldn’t easily hold a hand of 7 cards! Go Fish was the option. And she never “let” me win - at anything. Nor did she ever cheat.

    I vividly remember the twinkle in her eye any time the game got close, and she knew she had me. With her last ask that emptied her hand, as I handed over the winning card(s) she would say “Oh hello threes (or whatever). That’s someone GREETING CARDS.

    ReplyDelete
  36. I wanted to clarify to tht what I meant by my late comment yesterday about the Friends dispute. I thought his, didn’t like Friends, and Beezer’s liked Friends comments were interesting and informative to someone, me, who never saw the show.
    Other comments, not all, were over the top. tht was even criticized for using ad hominen !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @dgd…it’s interesting. I THINK @tht and I (from what I can tell) are similar in some ways. I also THINK (but do not know) that I’ve been a “participant” for a while longer. I’ve learned that ONE “false move” (I think you know what I mean)… can be criticized. So yesterday…”@tht took “it’s your loss” as negative. Then @tht gets criticized, and I KNOW that @tht isn’t mean. It can snowball. Over a sitcom. I WAS very consoled by the “spousal” differences. For instance. My husband simply cannot believe the fact that I love Law & Order (the original). It MIGHT be because, when it was actually started, my life was too damned busy to watch it. About a year ago I started on “reruns” sequentially. Haha…I finally got through THOSE but now I watch the new ones. I go to another room…it’s NOT every night…but he’ll say “another Law & Order!?”

      Delete
    2. @dgd I appreciate it. And it was nice to hear Beezer's defense. She knows the show much better than I do (and I didn't mean to put her on the defensive; of course she was graceful about all of it).

      The crucial difference between that show and Seinfeld, the other huge sitcom of the 90s, is that in Seinfeld there is no pretense that any of the characters are in any way likeable or have good qualities -- they are purely comedic constructions, brilliant ones at that -- whereas in Friends the characters are more recognizably humans you might come to care about (as fictional creations). That aspect came through very clearly in what Beezer wrote. Larry David himself was very explicit about that as well, where his guiding principle for Seinfeld was "no hugs, no learning" -- something that also applies to Curb Your Enthusiasm. "Hugs" being a shorthand here for sentimentality, and by design the characters never learn or grow.

      Delete
    3. @Beezer. It's not a big deal, but a minor point of clarification re "@tht took “it’s your loss” as negative".

      What I took as a negative wasn't that, but the ad hominem and reductionism about how the critics were so being smug in their attitude (there were other comments of a similar nature about virtue-signaling or having leftist friends or something like that). And that's before it got really crazy. I'm okay with the notion that I am missing an enjoyment of the show that others have felt -- while standing by everything else I averred about the show. But all that was yesterday.

      Delete
    4. I always enjoy this blog when something in a puzzle stimulates discussion and real opinion sharing. What I appreciate even more though is the consistent effort not to snark, snipe and take cheap shots at each other. Sure, we have differences of opinion and we share them - kinda like we’re being grownups. Who knew that was even possible these days. Thanks everyone!

      Delete
  37. Right off the bat: Dust or dirt? Darn or damn? Nicely ambiguous, and on a Monday!

    ReplyDelete
  38. No complaints here. I enjoyed the theme and the solve overall. My only hold-up was that I blanked on my spelling of NECTAR and I'm not up on my vegan skin care products. That made the SE dicey for me, needed to guess a couple of times.
    I thought this was an admirable debut - clever theme and gave a bit more resistance than a typical Monday. Good job Brian!

    ReplyDelete
  39. Alice Pollard9:05 PM

    ignored the theme. wasn't hard. easy-medium.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Anonymous9:10 PM

    You can play poker high or low. "Hi" = High so Sup, How's it hanging and similar don''t work the same :)

    ReplyDelete
  41. Anonymous9:36 PM

    Completely missed the theme until I saw this write up.

    Not an easy solve for me. Hated the proper name cross (Novak/Jackson)
    Both sports ball references too, ugh. Why aren’t there more art history clues?? Or how about 19th c French lit?

    As a woman & former makeup artist I’ve never heard of an EYE KIT. It sounds more like a first aid thing to me.

    Pretty ok fill otherwise.
    Cute theme once I finally got it, lol!

    ReplyDelete
  42. Anonymous9:42 PM

    Taunt in basketball:

    inYOurfACE

    ReplyDelete
  43. To @PH yesterday re the JOEY to CHANDLER soap quote. It’s one of my favorites too, but I hadn’t thought about it for a long time. And, because of the puzzle and your comment, I opened a new bar of soap from a local artisan this morning and laughed!

    ReplyDelete
  44. Anonymous8:53 PM

    Coming a little late to the party, but if 13 down was Eno rather than ego, you would get Agon(a late Stravinsky ballet) crossing Igor. That floated my boat.

    ReplyDelete