Thursday, June 5, 2025

Shoot into the pocket, in snooker / THU 6-5-25 / Midwest city whose name consists of two interjections / 1970s tennis champ Smith / Huge fan club, so to speak / Necessity for a reservation, perhaps / Unwanted "ingredient" when assembling s'mores, say / Someone who knows how the sausage gets made?

Constructor: Timothy Gaetz

Relative difficulty: Easy-Medium (Easy once you get the trick)


THEME: NO IFS AND OR BUTS (63A: Emphatic instruction for entering the answers to the puzzle's 10 starred clues?) — answers to starred clues have the letters "IF," "AND," or "BUT" removed, creating, uh, shorter answers that don't fit the clue:

Theme answers:
  • VER[IF]Y (14A: *Confirm to be true) 
  • [BUT]CHER (16A: *Someone who knows how the sausage gets made?)
  • TRI[BUT]ES (34A: *Formal expressions of praise)
  • ST[AND]OUT (47A: *One who's conspicuously excellent)
  • WA[IF]S (71A: *Street urchins)
  • B[AND]ITS (7D: *Armed thieves)
  • S[IF]TING (28D: *Removing lumps from, in a way)
  • [BUT]TONED (32D: *Like dress shirts, typically)
  • DE[BUT]ED (40D: *Showed for the first time)
  • ERR[AND]S (42D: *Buying a gallon of milk, picking up the laundry, etc.)
Word of the Day: STAN Smith (61D: 1970s tennis champ Smith) —

Stanley Roger Smith (born December 14, 1946) is an American former professional tennis player. A world No. 1 player and two-time major singles champion (at the 1971 US Open and 1972 Wimbledon Championships), Smith also paired with Bob Lutz to create one of the most successful doubles teams of all-time.

In 1970, Smith won the inaugural year-end championships title. In 1972, he was the year-end world No. 1 singles player. In 1973, he won his second and last year end championship title at the Dallas WCT Finals. In addition, he won four Grand Prix Championship Series titles.

In his early years he improved his tennis game through lessons from Pancho Segura, the Pasadena Tennis Patrons, and the sponsorship of the Southern California Tennis Association headed by Perry T. Jones. Smith is a past President of the International Tennis Hall of Fame and an ITHF Life Trustee. Outside tennis circles, Smith is best known as the namesake of a line of tennis shoes made by Adidas. (wikipedia)

• • •

Is "OM!" an interjection!? (8D: Midwest city whose name consists of two interjections = OMAHA). I'm imagining meditators shouting it and then high-fiving each other at the end of meditation session. "OM! Nice work, bro! Up top!" I get that "AHA!" is an exclamation, but "OM!" ... I don't get. Unless the two interjections are "O!" and "MAHA!" — ew, even typing MAHA made me kind of nauseated just now. Is the "M" just pretending it's not there. Like, "ignore me ... look at the other letters! They're definitely exclamations!" Why would you do this to OMAHA? I guess they had to try something to liven this puzzle up. When you have only two (2) (!) answers (outside the revealer) longer than six (6) (!?) letters, you gotta do everything you can to drum up some excitement. The themers are all just three to five letters long. I wonder if the theme might've worked better, i.e. been more spectacular, stunning, remarkable, funny, whatever, if the theme had been allowed to play out on a bigger canvas, with longer, wackier answers. I did a laugh a little, inside, at the idea of CHER being [Someone who knows how the sausage gets made?]. But overall, the theme answers were just so tidy, and tiny, that once I got the gimmick, there wasn't much interest left. What if you had taken the stars off the affected clues and then strewn the themers haphazardly (as opposed to perfectly symmetrically) around the grid? Now that would've been an adventure. Still the problem of short/boring themers, but at least there would've been a Real challenge. There's a good concept here—and NO IFS ANDS OR BUTS is an excellent standalone phrase, as well as an extremely literal revealer, but the execution was kind of ho-hum.


You can tell early on, or I could, that the answer at 14A should be VERIFY, but of course it won't fit. At first I thought maybe there was a rebus, and that "RIF" was all supposed to go in one square, but "RIF" is meaningless and anyway the cross (PREPAYMENT) eventually took care of any ambiguity as to how to enter the theme answer. After the missing "IF," my next themer appeared to be missing an "IRR" (!?). I mean, 28D: *Removing lumps from, in a way had to be ST[IRR]ING, right? Wrong. I actually didn't figure out what that answer was supposed to be (S[IF]TING) until after I was done with the puzzle. After I ran into a couple more starred clues and not getting anywhere quickly, I decided just to jump to the revealer and see what was going on. I got "NO IFS ANDS OR BUTS" immediately, with absolutely no crosses (63A: Emphatic instruction for entering the answers to the puzzle's 10 starred clues?). And that was pretty much that, difficulty-wise.


Not many places to screw up today once you got the theme, but even before that. I was able to sail around themers pretty easily, because, again, practically the entire grid was made up of toeholds, i.e. 3-to-5-letter answers. Nothing hard to parse, nothing esoteric. I had to navigate the stupid ambiguous clock toggle at 1A: Toggle on a digital clock (AM/PM), which of course I wrote in incorrectly (AM/FM). But PREPAYMENT eventually took care of that (3D: Necessity for a reservation, perhaps). I didn't really know that POT was a snooker term (23D: Shoot into the pocket, in snooker). But other than that, I don't remember a single moment of struggle. Helped that I was familiar with Blame It On RIO and STAN Smith, as well as crosswordese like "I, TOO" and OASTS and STENO. I'm not sure where any difficulty would come from today, outside the puzzle's gimmick. I also didn't object to much in today's puzzle. I think the THE in THE PRAIRIE is kind of absurd (11D: Setting for a Laura Ingalls Wilder book series). Yes, one of the books, and the TV show, was called Little House on THE PRAIRIE, but that doesn't all of a sudden make THE PRAIRIE good standalone fill. If you're doing a partial title, then clue it that way. I wouldn't like THE SEA as an answer for [Setting for a Hemingway novel] either, any more than I'd like THE MOHICANS as an answer for [Tribe in a James Fenimore Cooper novel]. Gratuitous definite articles, bah. But it's easy, and harmless, so I'm not actually mad. Just kinda side-eyeing that answer a little. 


What else?:
  • 15A: Like 2027 and 2029, but not 2025 (PRIME) — they're numbers, not years! Surprise. I didn't know there were PRIMEs so close together still when the numbers got that high, but admittedly I spend almost no time thinking about PRIME numbers in my regular life. The top section of this puzzle was the hardest for me to get into, because it had a themer and it had that weird OMAHA clue and it had this clue (which I didn't get instantly) and it had the actor from Succession, which I'll never watch because the very, very (very) last thing I want to watch is stories about billionaires. I'm sure the show is great. I hear it's great. But ... my brain cannot take it. I don't want to hear anymore about ****ing billionaires than I absolutely ****ing have to. I'm not curious. I'm not interested. I'm not envious. I just don't care, and I'm exhausted from endless media fascination with the amoral rich. Just pay your fair share of taxes and leave me alone. You know what's a good show? Dying for Sex. Stunningly good. So original. So beautiful. And not a billionaire in sight.
  • 22A: Unwanted "ingredient" when assembling s'mores, say (ASH) — because the marshmallow melted off your stick and fell in the fire.  
  • 33A: Li'l belly (TUM) — this is more like [Half a li'l belly], but I'll allow it.
  • 39A: Like some coffees and mob targets (ICED) — grim. No need to bring murder into this. Why would you ruin coffee time like that? [Like some coffees and cakes]. See, much nicer. And you still get your double meaning. Win-win!
  • 50A: Animal symbol of innocence (DOE) — me: "LAMB." Then me: "... ... ..."
  • 57A: Companionship (ARK) — ooh, that's a good clue. Nice pun on "ship." I wrote this in first as ARM, which I liked OK (you might offer your companion your ARM if you're escorting them somewhere or merely walking affectionately side by side). But Noah's ARK, animals, two by two, yes, that's good.
  • 13D: Huge fan club, so to speak (ARMY) — Arnie's ARMY is the fan club I associate most with ARMY, though it looks like there's a BTS ARMY, which I imagine is fairly massive. I would've written HIVE in here if the crosses hadn't prevented me.

See you next time.

Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld

[Follow Rex Parker on BlueSky and Facebook]

110 comments:

  1. Anonymous6:02 AM

    RIF isn’t meaningless, it stands for reduction in force aka layoffs in corporate lingo. But that would be a pretty grim theme for a puzzle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:06 AM

      Reading Is Fundamental!

      Delete
  2. Anonymous6:04 AM

    I think S[AND]TOUT should be ST[AND]OUT, but “sand tout” makes for a perfectly cromulent definition of conspicuous excellence. “He’s such a sand tout, he can sell dirt in Arizona.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6:39 AM

      Reluctantly, I fixed it 😀 ~RP

      Delete
    2. Anonymous7:22 AM

      👏🏼 👏🏼 👏🏼

      Delete
    3. Anonymous7:39 AM

      I dunno. I thought that interpretation embiggened the theme.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous6:38 AM

    There are actually thought to be infinitely many primes that are only 2 apart, like 2027 and 2029. These are called twin primes, and the twin primes conjecture that there are indeed infinitely many of them is the most famous unsolved maths problem, as it is unproven despite being known about for thousands of years.

    Succession is a show for people who hate billionaires, and it is truly amazing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The largest pair of primes that are only 2 apart so far discovered have over 300000 digits.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:27 PM

      That's odd.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:35 PM

      The Twin Prime Conjecture's first known appearance in print was 1846. So I'm skeptical about this "thousands of years" business.

      Delete
  4. I got the theme after having a few of the theme answers completed because of the crosses. Trying to figure out what word was removed from what word hurt my brain. Although I solved in below-average time for a Thursday I felt that this played harder than normal. I like the concept but didn't enjoy solving this one at all.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous6:56 AM

    Why does CHER know how the sausage gets made? I had CHEF for the longest time....until the (KISS) ARMY won out.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jean. B.7:07 AM

    2027? 2029? These years are still the years of my prime. It is important to recognise the years of one's prime, always remember that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Andy Freude8:09 AM

      In 2029 I’ll be 73. Definitely in my prime!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous8:25 AM

      The prime of Miss Jean B.....Rosie?!

      Delete
    3. Oh oh, I think I'm past my prime.

      Delete
    4. Hahaha! @Jean B, I refuse to become un-PRIME!

      Delete

  7. Easy-Medium. I realized early on that the clues didn't match the answers BUT that the answers were all regular words. So I ignored the starred clues. Somewhere around 47A I realized that the answer was missing AND. That inspired me to revisit CHER at 16A AND then I realized it was missing BUT. So I kinda got the idea, BUT I didn't really grok it until I got the revealer (from crosses because I ignored that clue too). I still didn't get S[IF]TING at 28D until I came here.

    No overwrites, the only WOE was BRIAN Cox at 6D.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:29 AM

      I didn't get the two where the "but" came first i.e. BUTcher and BUTtoned!

      Delete
  8. Similar to Rex, I got the reveal before I fully discerned the theme, although I did know that something was up with the VER(if)Y situation. I thought it was pretty balanced and fair, with just the right degree of difficulty for me - and probably the most creative clue for CHER in NYT history. I think this is my favorite Thursday puzzle of the year so far - wow, I’m praising a Thursday !

    ReplyDelete
  9. Man, 32D gave me fits. 38A could have been ITa or ITO, and it just didn't occur to me for a long time that the IF/AND/BUT could appear at the beginning of the word.

    Never heard of BRIAN Cox, who would not be among my top 10 Brians. Boitano would of course be #1. Actually, this particular BRIAN Cox would not be my #1 BRIAN Cox. That would be BRIAN Cox the scientist, the British version of Neil DeGrasse Tyson.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:33 AM

      I eventually just ran the vowels on that one for the win.

      Delete
  10. I could have written today's review because my solving experience was almost identical to that of OFL. I mean that literally. Same mistakes (later rectified), same opinions on the puzzle, same hatred of billionaires, etc. Frankly, it's uncanny.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous7:23 AM

    KISS ARMY!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous7:25 AM

    Anyone else left wracking their brains after completing the puzzle, wondering how STANDING could mean removing lumps from, in a way?

    Or had BRIG for 7 down (armed thieves), since it would make BRIGANDS (if you took the revealer to mean “NO ANDS,” as in plural)

    Those two (coincidences?) pushed this into hard territory for me.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Cute enough but definitely lacking the scope and magnitude of a proper Thursday. Fun to work and like the spanning revealer.

    Yo La Tengo

    Didn’t love the plural OASTS. Most of the fill was early week level but clean enough. Agree with Rex that the ship misdirect was the cluing highlight.

    Pleasant Thursday morning solve.

    John DOE

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous7:36 AM

    So happy to finally find someone who feels exactly as I do about Succession.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:43 AM

      Yes. Facile. I hear Brian Cox’s voice in McDonald’s ads and think wow this supposed titan of industry is actually a friendly shill for fast breakfast food?

      Delete
  15. Yo mismo le echo la culpa a Río.

    Super difficult and super fun. A Thursday Thurzing like crazy. Ended up on the bottom working the reveal early as nothing was making any sense, and once that was in, the rest of the puzzle opened up a tad. Still, not knowing whether it would be IF, AND, or BUT made every starred clue a challenge. I loved this one.

    Mr. Spock is only an alien when he's not on Vulcan. And I don't know why we divide people up like this. Aren't we all galactic travelers?

    May I recommend cold brew over ICED coffee, and given the choice, your cold brew should be made with African beans and not the travesties grown in the western hemisphere.

    I knew a cat named ECRU in college and I loved her so much.

    Companionship for ARK is great. The clue for ART is way too loooooooong. Nice to know Wilder wasn't writing about just any prairie; she was writing about THE PRAIRIE. A taco isn't a sandwich.

    People: 10 {no wonder this was tough}
    Places: 3
    Products: 3
    Partials: 3 {didn't count themers as partials 😉}
    Foreignisms: 1
    --
    Gary's Grid Gunk Gauge: 20 of 82 (24%)

    Funnyisms: 4 🙂

    Tee-Hee: ASS. Phew, they are really on a run again. Maybe our 5th-grader-in-slush is back for the summer.

    Uniclues:

    1 Another way of saying Sonny Bono's duet partner is getting old.
    2 Those in a writer's room waxing poetic over a Nissan pickup.
    3 Latest sequel in the scary space bug franchise.
    4 Uh, just deleted this clue, but there was a hart involved.
    5 Sound of your car tires getting you out of there.

    1 VERY PRIME CHER
    2 TITAN ODES TEAM (~)
    3 ALIEN AROAR
    4 DOE ASS
    5 THE PRAIRIE TUNE

    My Fascinating Crossword Uniclue Keepsake from Last Year: The beach. LAND LUBBER'S RIM.

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Re 5th Grader … a summer intern perhaps.

      Delete
    2. JazzmanChgo1:49 PM

      Yes, Satchmo was often called "SATCH" by friends. He was also called "Gates" or "Gate" sometimes, since another of his nicknames was "Gatemouth."

      Delete
    3. ChrisS2:36 PM

      I agree cold brew is so so so much better than iced coffee. An aeropress makes similar low acid hot coffee. What's wrong with western hemisphere coffee? Agree mass market Brazilian and Columbian is not good but plenty of good coffee from South/Central America. Not to mention Jamaican Blue Mountain and Hawaiian Kona.

      Delete
    4. Love me some Ethiopian Yergacheffe cold brew @Gary J! As a drinker of lots and lots of coffee, I agree that Africa is producing so many wonderful types. Also thought calling Mr. Spock ALIEN was just rude. Personally, I find him almost sui generis.

      Delete
  16. EasyEd7:49 AM

    Felt this was a “tidy” puzzle, a simple theme where the abbreviated theme answers were still actual words, and very few long answers. Had a hard time starting in the upper half: could not decide between AMfM or AMPM because those digital clocks all tend to double as radios, could not make AVer work, and had no idea of the theme at that point. Actually got started in the lower half where (kinda like Rex) I filled in the revealer with almost no crosses in place. Arnie’s ARMY was big in my teen years—that may date this puz a bit! Or me.

    ReplyDelete
  17. That's it. No more Thursdays. Finding the gimmick is not fun. Took me 25 years to figure this out.

    ReplyDelete
  18. There have been debut puzzles recently that were made after many Times rejections of previous puzzles – which I found inspiring. Today we have the opposite, where this is the first puzzle the constructor ever crafted, and it got accepted! That’s inspiring as well.

    There’s nothing amateur about the build, either. The theme answers, including the revealer are either symmetrical or centered. The grid symmetry is left/right, which is not the standard design. The theme answers minus the IFs, ANDs, or BUTs, make bona fide crossword answers. And ten theme answers!

    That spanning revealer looks gorgeous in the grid, no?

    I love when a Thursday puzzle evokes a “What the heck is going on?” My brain revels in cracking the riddle. I love when a world-class clue shows up in the box, like today’s [Companionship?].

    Fun, satisfying, and inspiring. You hit the trifecta, Timothy – congratulations on your debut, and thank you for this!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Bob Mills8:02 AM

    Caught on to the theme with ERR(and)S, which helped with other less visible theme answers, especially WAifS. I foolishly abbreviated "dead on arrival" as "dor" at first instead of DOA (don't ask me why). Very enjoyable puzzle, compared with most Thursdays...not easy, but doable.

    ReplyDelete
  20. NO IFS ANDS OR BUTS is one of those phrases just begging for a theme, and this theme has been done before, though never as it was done today.

    An example of how it was done differently is a puzzle last year in Universal Crosswords, where the trick occurred in the clues, so ALTO, for instance, was clued [Butcher’s range].

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anonymous8:05 AM

    For Rex: I think the first interjection is simply "O," as in "O say, can you see, by the dawn's early light, etc,"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:27 AM

      That would make the second one MAHA, which is a debacle but not an interjection.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous3:10 PM

      The clue doesn't say you must use all the letters in Omaha. It says the name "consists" of two interjections. One being simply "O!", the other being either "Ha!" or "Aha!"

      Delete
  22. Oh, I liked seeing TACO for the second time this week, and I'll leave it at that.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous8:33 AM

    Painfully inartful.

    ReplyDelete
  24. So, there were the themers I saw and got immediately, the themers I never got around to parsing because I didn't need to, and the themer I couldn't figure out at all -- even though I couldn't finish the puzzle without it. That one was BUTTONED for the dress shirts.

    It didn't help that I had no idea if the Spanish ending was ITA, ITO or ITE. Damn those Spanish endings!

    The revealer is right on the money and wonderful. Bet Lewis guessed it early. I didn't.

    Liked the puzzle a lot, but found it very easy and very doable without needing to figure out all the theme answer manipulations. Except in that one area where I absolutely didn't see it. I didn't think of the BUT as a lead-in -- and since a lot of casual shirts are also BUTTONED, I never thought of BUTTONED as an answer. Instead I'm wondering how dress shirts are TONED.

    I'm thinking there will be a wide gap between those who found this easy and those who found it hard. Also between those who will be mostly charmed and those who will be mostly annoyed. I'll go back and read y'all now.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Anonymous8:52 AM

    Once again the gimmick-rot spills over from Thursday to Wednesday. Could we please stop that and, while we're at it, edit out the non-words (AROAR)? Asking for a friend....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "The great room, ordinarily aroar with life, was still and gloomy as a tomb." -Jack London, Too Much Gold

      Delete
    2. I would call AROAR an obsolescent word, rather than a non-word. I've seen it in (old) print, but can't recall ever hearing it spoken. Too Much Gold was published in 1903. Anyone have a more recent example?

      Delete
  26. Oooops. Today *is* Thursday! Sorry, group. The comment on AROAR stands, though.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Well, it's never ITE, so you can narrow it down a little (un poco).

    ReplyDelete
  28. ugh. Hated the theme.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Avoided the AMFM trap by thinking of 1A as a clock only, very helpful. Of course it was VERIFY but letters missing. The rest of the clues and answers were straightforward enough that I went (mostly) zipping through this, got to the revealer early, read the clue, had noticed at least the missing ANDS, and wrote in the revealer, which explained everything. Same problem with BUTONED as some others as my thing standing by a pond was originally a DEER. Oops.

    Today's Old Friend is OAST. Nice to see you again, and I see you brought some others. Welcome back.

    Like seeing TACO, which I hope lands and sticks. How do you like it, Tiny Hands?

    Sorry, but ROOS is superfluous. We already have plenty of ROOS.

    This is some debut, TG. Too Good for a beginner, and I'm looking froward to more from you. Thanks for all the fun.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Anonymous9:19 AM

    IF there was a list of best DEBUTED puzzles of the year, I’d have my top choice right here. Wow, wow AND wow! I thought I had seen some good Thursdays BUT this one? With its TEN theme answers? Pure gold.

    That SLY FOX, Timothy Gaetz, he almost had me fooled. I was ready to whine like a sad PUPPY and throw in the towel before I had my OM AHA moment of enlightenment AT LAST. After that, it was a fun challenge to look for each * clue and figure out what was missing where. But that was easier said than done; BUTCHER and BUTTONED both took me a while. If I admit to the ACTUAL fact, none of them exactly jumped off the grid for me. Maybe I need to start doing some cryptics and get better at this.

    A thoroughly fun exercise this morning. Thanks, Timothy and congratulations. Not only your first NYT publication but also your VERY first crossword construction? Again… wow! Please don’t let this be your last.

    ReplyDelete
  31. IF there was a list of best DEBUTED puzzles of the year, I’d have my top choice right here. Wow, wow AND wow! I thought I had seen some good Thursdays BUT this one? With its TEN theme answers? Pure gold.

    That SLY FOX, Timothy Gaetz, he almost had me fooled. I was ready to whine like a sad PUPPY and throw in the towel before I had my OM AHA moment of enlightenment AT LAST. After that, it was a fun challenge to look for each * clue and figure out what was missing where. But that was easier said than done; BUTCHER and BUTTONED both took me a while. If I admit to the ACTUAL fact, none of them exactly jumped off the grid for me. Maybe I need to start doing some cryptics and get better at this.

    A thoroughly fun exercise this morning. Thanks, Timothy and congratulations. Not only your first NYT publication but also your VERY first crossword construction? Again… wow! Please don’t let this be your last.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Sam W9:22 AM

    Long time reader, first time commenter (I think... my memory is pretty shot for a 29 year old). My debut here should speak to how passionately I disliked this puzzle.

    I solved it last night around 3am while whittling away at my insomnia, and within minutes was already thinking "I can't wait to see what Rex has to say about this." Surprisingly, your review is more forgiving than mine, but again we've already established I'm here to complain.

    I'm familiar with the AMPM / AMFM mixup, but starting with it at 1-across feels almost insulting; at least save that for a few clues in, don't make me flip a coin right off the bat. I thought 3-down could have possibly started with FREE, like having a FREE NIGHT during the week (which doesn't fit, but at least made me consider something else in that vein). Anyways, opening with this clue felt like a slight from Timothy Gaetz (who I believe made his NYT debut today, so I won't be too harsh on him since Will Shortz has ̶b̶l̶o̶o̶d̶ ink on his hands, too).

    My first real gripe was with the inconsistency in the structure of the themers. I got the theme quickly enough, but didn't love how the omitted theme words weren't in a consistent place in the answers (e.g., BUT at the start of BUTCHER but in the middle of TRIBUTES). Identifying this for each themer just felt like an additional step of critical thinking that was more tedious than fun.

    The most egregious thing in here, I think, is the clue for 9-down. I've done a lot of crosswords... is 1st grade arithmetic a common clue format I've missed? Maybe earlier in the week, but how in the hell did anyone think "Clue Number + One" was an acceptable clue? They might as well have just filled in the TEN themselves. Talk about a FREE SQUARE (looking at you, 3-down).

    I really hated ART as the answer for 54-across. The clue is written pretty specifically and, moreover, almost in awe of what the answer is slated to be. What could this stunning discovery be? I was expecting something unexpected, like a short, esoteric name of an ancient artifact I couldn't quite remember. When I got ART, I was just imagining an archaeologist at a press conference building the crowd up with excitement for this stunning 17,000-year-old find in the most unlikely of places. The archaeology journalists are clamoring for the big reveal. As the turmoil in the crowd crescendos, the artifact-finder on stage rips the curtain off a giant sign which reads "ART" in Comic Sans. Wow, what a breakthrough.

    Otherwise, I shared your issue with the lack of >6 letter answers, and I also grimaced at THE PRAIRIE. I guess THE BEATLES would work, but I think THE really needs to earn its place in an answer and this was just not it. OMAHA was pretty meh too, but I've always liked it as a word so I'll let it slide.

    Anyhoo, thanks for giving me an outlet to vent this puzzle-related frustration. Hopefully it'll be a while before I feel compelled to rip a puzzle apart like this again. Until next time!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Sam, and welcome to the blog. I also felt a bit frustrated at the inconsistent order of missing letters in the theme answers. Sometimes a thing like that can make you end up hating the entire puzzle. You may not be familiar with the TV show and book series Little House on THE PRAIRIE. For me - at a few decades past age 29 - the clue referencing the author of the books made it as easy as “clue number plus one.“ Just saying, the answer would be incomplete without the THE, so in this case, it seems appropriate.

      Delete
    2. I hear ya, and I’m familiar a bit! At least l, I’ve heard it mentioned plenty in the context of the TV show. Still, it feels weird to call that setting THE Prairie to me, though I do understand pulling it straight from the title does justify it. I’ll let it slide here since I think I’m only scrutinizing so much because of how grumpy the rest of the puzzle made me!

      Appreciate the welcome! I’m amazed it took me this long to finally contribute considering how long I’ve been reading these posts (and comments)! Perhaps you’ll see more of me soon.

      Delete
    3. ChrisS2:45 PM

      Hi Sam. Yeah 54A was very bad, my only guess with no crosses was map. Which would be stunning, but then I thought I should know about any 17,000 year old maps

      Delete
  33. Anonymous9:29 AM

    theme was terrible. ugh

    ReplyDelete
  34. While this puzzle may have no BUTS, at least it's got an ASS.

    The grid looks somewhat like a person doing a "Don't ask me" shrug if you squint.

    It's funny that there is only one "if, and or but" in the clues, and one that could have been very easily avoided, leaving the entire enterprise with none except in the revealer.

    As the saying goes, better an ALIEN in your house than ALIEN on your house. In either case, Eileen and I lean on it if you allow it.

    There's so much ASS in the NYTXW lately that people are saying Will Shortz put the anal in BANAL.

    I struggled with [General name on a Chinese menu]? TSO it goes.

    Good concept, but you can't make a real fun puzzle out of so many tiny themers. Thanks and congrats, Timothy Gaetz.

    ReplyDelete
  35. For 28D, I supposed ST(AND)ING instead of S(IF)TING. Would the lumps in a batter dissolve if the mixture were left STANDING?

    Happy to see that there are other math people here. Nice comments about the twin primes.

    Do we like Rex more or less now that we know that he hates billionaires? Do we care?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:24 AM

      Stop trying to make “we” happen, sad guy. No one wants to be on your little Rex-hating team. Grow up.

      Delete
  36. I enjoyed THE PRAIRIE because "Little House on the Prairie" is what Laura Ingalls Wilder is most associated with, and so "the prairie" immediately came to mind, but I thought of course it couldn't be that... am I supposed to remember exactly where "the prairie" was? Somewhere in the midwest? I don't know, it's just the prairie! So it made me laugh when that was the actual answer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Andy Freude12:47 PM

      Yes, and the first book is “Little House in the Big Woods.” No prairie there at all.

      Delete
    2. Pretty sure the prairie was in Kansas (territory at the time). Loved those books!

      Delete
  37. Anonymous9:53 AM

    For Anonymous: You're assuming the "O" and "AHA" don't work as the answer because they don't use all the letters in OMAHA. But the clue, as written, doesn't stipulate that. If one accepts "O" as an interjection, as in the national anthem, then the clue, merely citing two interjections, is valid.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nah, the clue says the name "consists of" two exclamations.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous1:36 PM

      Agree with the Anon, not jberg. "Consists of" does not always mean "exclusively made from", just that it contains those things (possibly among other things).

      Delete
    3. Anonymous3:04 PM

      That’s dumb. By that logic, GROUCHO has two exclamations in it. ONO. ORONO has three! Absurd

      Delete
    4. Anonymous3:11 PM

      If "consists of" does not imply the entire contents, then water consists of hydrogen, and the USA consists of Delaware and the town of Poughkipsie.

      Delete
  38. Anonymous10:00 AM

    I loved the grid and many things in the puzzle, but not the editing. The Titans may have been giants in Greek mythology, but Goliath was not a Titan. He was a Philistine giant in the Bible.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous1:56 PM

      Yeah, that one threw me off, as well. I supposed Goliath was "titanic" in the modern vernacular sense of being huge, but it still seems like a stretch,

      Delete
  39. I got the theme early on and had fun figuring ut the theme answers, but TOLET/OASTS kept me from getting the happy music. I didn't grok the clue "Flat sign" correctly; I thought there must be a term I'd never heard of for the musical flat sign! Never thought about the other kind of flat. Darn!

    ReplyDelete
  40. Just want to add that I thought the puzzle was made more fun by the fact that the IFs, ANDs, and BUTs were in diferent places in the theme answers. To me it would have been boring if they all occurred in the same position. And I just learned that this was the constructor's debut...wow! Congratulations! I'm definitely in the "loved this one" camp.

    ReplyDelete
  41. The theme of this puzzle was de[but]ed in the Times 28 years ago on May 10, 1997, an Isabel Walcott construction. It was a Saturday puzzle and the theme is given in the puzzle in an amusing way. Go to the archive and check it out.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Anonymous10:24 AM

    I have only heard Louis Armstrong referred to as the great Satchmo. Never Satch. But then again he was before my time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Andy Freude12:50 PM

      Pops had many nicknames, including Gatemouth and Satchelmouth, the latter sometimes shortened to Satchmo or Satch.

      Delete
  43. Good one! Such nice work with the constructing scalpel to excise all IFS, ANDS, and BUTS to leave real words! I caught on to the idea, sort of, after I saw that VERY and BITS had lost their IF and AND; the "sort of" is because I thought the sausage maker was a CHoppER. How was the constructor going to work "opp" into the theme? Similar issue with STirrING. Still, I wrote in what had to be the reveal and then got serious about rethinking and came up with the correct BUTCHER and SIFTING. For me, it was a plus that the excised words moved around, a twist that added some zing to the theme.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Anonymous11:01 AM

    I’ve always said, No ands, ifs, or buts

    ReplyDelete
  45. Alice Pollard11:06 AM

    Very similar to REX. Had AMfM first, didnt see SifTING til now , and had Ant before ASH. nice puzzle. more medium than easy for me.

    ReplyDelete
  46. This was a fun Thursday puzzle, an anti-rebus. I was afraid it would be too easy after I saw VER[if]Y at 14A and ran down to 63A and plopped in NO IFS ANDS OR BUTS without reading the clue. The stars on the clues didn't make it too easy because sometimes it was hard to see what the clue was getting at. For instance, I spent a few nanoseconds trying to see why ST[and]ING meant "Removing lumps from, in a way" before I realized it was S[if]TING. Having the BUTs disappear from the front of BUTTONED and BUTCHER was a good twist.

    Best clue of the day for me was "Companionship?" for ARK and that KNOW cross was the hardest for me to see today, with only _NO_ in place for a while.

    Thanks, Timothy Gaetz!

    ReplyDelete
  47. Anonymous11:09 AM

    I TOO enjoyed this one more than Rex. Understandable to quibble with THE or TITAN, yet I’m content with TEN theme entries though nine + 1 seemed like lazy editing.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Easy-medium for me. I solved most of this before I got to the reveal which was a gimme by the time I got there…so, it worked nicely as a themeless. I probably spent almost as much time after the solve trying to figure out where the IFs, ANDs, and BUTs went as I did solving it.

    No WOEs and ITa before ITO was it for costly erasures.

    Cute and clever, liked it.

    ReplyDelete
  49. I'm currently reading a book, "A Divine Language" by Alec Wilkinson, ostensibly about the author's attempt to learn mathematics such as algebra, geometry and calculus after failing to do so in school, but it is actually more about the philosophy of mathematics. He has a section about primes and I was interested to learn that primes are used in the technology behind RSA, the security system. I had a little dongle that spat out six-digit random numbers that I needed to enter when I performed certain activities on the bank account at work. I have no idea how the primes made it possible but an interesting factoid for me.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Anonymous11:24 AM

    I really liked this one. It was just challenging enough and fun to boot! Thank you Mr. Gaetz!

    ReplyDelete
  51. Dying For Sex really IS a great show.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Well, well, yesterday we learned about a previously little-known to crossworld king of Norway and Sweden, and today we learn about his eponymous palace.

    I'm also happy that I could guess the revealer fairly quickly. I saw the missing IF in VERY, and another one in SIFTING, so I was on the prowl for more ifs -- but DEED needed a BUT, and then I got a second BUT somewhere, counted the letters in NO IFS ANDS OR BUTS, and put it in with no crosses. It took me a little longer to see that sometimes the missing letters were in front of what was in the grid, I was so sold on BRIG(AND) that I toyed with the possibility that the clue had been incorrectly pluralized. That top-central section was tough for me -- no idea about actor Cox, wanting giant before TITAN (I mean Goliath was, in fact, a giant, and was not a titan in the usual sense-- but yeah, Joachin's dictum), and resisting OMAHA because OM doesn't fit my idea of an interjection.

    Missed opportunity with the TACO clue, but probably this was all set in stone long before Trump Always Chickens Out became a thing on Wall Street.

    One of the books in that series (I think I've read them all, out loud) is called "Little House in the Big Woods," but I guess THE PRAIRIE is one of the settings for the series, so that's OK. And I had trouble with STILE, since the purpose of one is to give people entry to a field--but I guess it's a barrier to any animals penned up in said field.

    ISLES was a step too far, though. An archipelago is made up of ISLES, so why does the clue single out a cluster of them?

    On the plus, plus, plus side, that clue for ARK! It took me a long time to see how that fit.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Ah, PREPAYMENT. My wife and I drive to Florida every March for 2 weeks on (or at least near) the beach. To make it easier, I always book hotel rooms at appropriate distances for the time down; and since I was sure we wouldn't change our minds, I booked the cheaper non-refundable fares. I've been doing that for years, and probably saved money in the long run. But this year, on the day we planned to leave, we noticed a problem with the clutch; turned out we needed a new one. Our local garage said they could fix it, but not until the next day. So I called all the hotels; one agreed to roll our booking over to the next night; the other 3, all parts of big chains, would not. I think we lost at least a grand on that -- so never again non-refundable!

    For years I have wondered why I only see Generall TSO's chicken in puzzles, but only see General Gau's on restaurant menus. So today I finally looked it up--and they're the same dish! Consider me enlightened.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Anonymous12:22 PM

    For Anonymous: Louis Armstrong's monicker was "Satchmo," yes indeed.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Trinch1:10 PM

    I agree on your take of Omaha. It was my first though and immediately dismissed. Then I went with Akron, as in... "Ack!!!" "RUN!!!"
    Yet all that led to was a moderate level of confusion and rework.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Airymom1:13 PM

    This was a good puzzle, but there was a better iteration about 20 years ago with the same revealer.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Wow. I don't know what's more impressive - that this is your DEBUT puzzle, that I finished it (CHER was my first clue as to what was going on) or that you have 10 brothers & 3 sisters!
    Debut Puzzle of the Year!
    Thank you, Timothy :)

    ReplyDelete
  58. Anonymous1:51 PM

    In the context of "Star Trek," I don't think Spock or anyone else on the Enterprise crew was considered an "alien" (or a "native," for that matter). Did Federation starships even have a "native" planet with which they were officially identified?

    ReplyDelete
  59. Yes, the theme was a great idea but one that made some answers really difficult to figure out (eg STING => STANDING? CHER => ???). I caught onto the "missing AND" at STOUT but didn't get the big idea until the revealer. And then I missed the asterisk in the clue for 32 down so I just thought: dress shirts are "toned"?... guess so.

    Yesterday I commented that Spelling Bee doesn't accept OPAH; and today we have our old friend AROAR. I always try it; you never know when Sam might change his mind!

    ReplyDelete
  60. Anonymous2:14 PM

    Geez. If i’d’ve read COMPANIONSHIP right just once instead of reading it as CHAMPIONSHIP every dang time…maybe ARK would’ve come to me.

    ReplyDelete
  61. This one didn’t really do it for me. I mean the theme was pretty cool. It baffled me enough that I had to do something I hardly ever do: I skipped to the revealer, which always seems to me to be verging on cheating. But it worked. Dropped it in with no crosses and went back up to adjust VERifY and BandITS and I was off and running (ambling, actually; this is a pleasant pastime not a race). So kudos for the theme. Clever. Fun. But the fill, with one exception, was dull, not exactly crosswordese, but definitely on the routine, gluey side.

    The exception, of course, as many have noted, is ARK for Companionship at 57A. Quite lovely. Like Rex, I considered ARm and even considered Aro. It seems to be trending in the NYTXW, no?

    But the “meh” stuff, just too many words to list. 3, 4’ and 5 letter words I have seen in crosswords a thousand or more times.

    And when did DOE become a symbol of innocence? Or OMAHA two interjections?

    Also like the cue at 15A for prime numbers. I’ve played a lot of team sports (soccer, baseball, lacrosse, and hockey) and when I join a team I always try to get a jersey with a prime number on the back. Not sure why exactly, just a “thing” with me. My fave is 19 because my wife’s cousin, and one of my favourite guys, related or not, wore it to win 5 Stanley Cups with the Montreal Canadiens in the 1960s.

    And finally, I have to agree with @jberg that 31D STILEs provide access, not barriers to entry. Somebody needs to get those editors out of the city for a while.

    ReplyDelete
  62. I'm later than snot postin, today. Too many appointments this am.

    Ahar! As others have pointed out, this is a puztheme first toyed with back in 1997 by Isabel Walcott darlin. M&A remembered it, as it was a themed SatPuz in the book of Will Shortz's Fave NYTPuzs, which I have a copy of. The version of the revealer in that 1997 puz *definitely* rated a SatPuz difficulty. har.
    btw: That 1997 Walcott puz was her only NYTPuz.

    staff weeject pick: POT. Was totally snookered by its mysterious clue.

    This 2025 version of the puztheme is definitely usin a different approach. And M&A likes different, sooo ... OK.
    Has 82 words in a standard 15x15 puzgrid, btw. Also different.

    some other fave stuff: The E/W puzgrid symmetry. SLYFOX. PRIME clue. PUPPY love.

    Thanx for the fun, Mr. Gaetz dude. And congratz on yer handsome debut.

    Masked & Anonymo4Us

    ... no ifs ands or buts in this PUPPY, either ...

    Stumpy Stumper: "Wiener Dog Runt #76" - 16x3.5 12 min. themeless runt puzzle:

    **gruntz**

    M&A

    ReplyDelete
  63. Anonymous4:31 PM

    For a nice you tube about primes and music try Marc Evanstein The rhythms of the primes

    ReplyDelete
  64. Anonymous5:27 PM

    Like many others I loved the 57A clue for ARK. I also enjoyed figuring outage them answers once I caught on.
    I knew 14A VERY needed to add IF for verify, but IF would not work with the next starred answers so I was stumbling thru the puzzle until I got to the revealer . Even then there was some challenge because the omitted words appeared in direct parts of the words. Felt a bit slooow over how long I took to see BUTCHER as the answer for 16 A
    And I just realized that IF, AND, and BUT appear in order across the second line of the puzzle. Wow a little hidden treat.
    Because I was feeling all smiley about ARK, etc. I wanted to comment. It was after 4 am eastern time and I'm sure I've seen comments with earlier times on them. But it was still Saturday on the blog.
    So I went to bed and got up about 2 noon Eastern time.
    Can someone tell me if I there is some way to post before the puzzle changes?
    ( I see none of the posts are that early today, but they have been.)

    ReplyDelete
  65. SharaonAK5:38 PM

    PS: Woops I think I may have published as anonymous with a request for info - not smart
    PPS: Re "consists of" Anonymous at 3:11was right on. Great examples .

    ReplyDelete
  66. Anonymous8:27 PM

    Finally home, after a drive to Mass MOCA to see old friends and new, and their work.
    Now I come home to this.
    Ok, fine. It's Thursday. Nothing to hate, and a clean grid in my usual blue ink.
    But, (OOPS! Sorry!)

    ReplyDelete
  67. When VER(if)Y wouldn’t fit and the crosses well, verified that VERY is correct, I went through the same thought process as OFL. Then I came across ither clues with asterisks and the “missing link” as it were was not “if,” I had to puzz for a while. (Love the Dr. Seuss quote from “The Grinch . . . “ when he says “He puzzed and he puzzed ‘til his puzzler was sore.”). My puzzler got sore a couple times.

    I solved using just the clues and was fine, but wondering how it was all going to come together. Then, when the reveal arrived (yes, my frustration level at one point was high enough that I was tempted to go solve it already!) I was so happy to have resisted. All of a sudden, the mists cleared and the AHA arrived.

    An aside on AHA, OM-AHA actuallly. What a clunker!

    So, after the reveal, only the WA(if)S were left, so I went ahead and finished the puzzle (in typical Thursday time). Then I went back to figure out where the omitted words belonged. The “if” ones were easy. CHER and TONED though took some head scratching. It took way too long for my brain to “allow” the omitted words to be left off the beginning rather than excised from the middle of the answer word. (but)CHER and (but)TONED therefore took me a bit to figure out. Comes from being so darn PRIME.

    A new take on the Thursday “leave something out/rebus” ideas, and a DE(but) as well! Congrats Timothy Gaetz. I enjoyed it.

    And, my wonderful granddaughter left primary school today as a promoted 6th grader, headed for Middle School. She was gorgeous. After the short ceremony, parents and kids have a picnic. Afterwards, Grace and her little posse were headed into the gym to the school’s traditional “no parents allowed” 6th grade party/dance. Teachers only. She joined our family 5 years ago. Seeing the self-assured, kind, funny almost teenager now I cannot help but be amazed at the power of love and structure.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Anonymous9:37 PM

    Hi Rex,

    An interjection is a part of speech. It doesn't necessarily have to be something exclaimed. If it's something that someone says that is not any of the other ones, it's an interjection. As "om" (the thing that monks say) is not a verb, adverb, etc., it must be an interjection. It's usually set apart from a sentence by an exclamation point, or by a comma when the feeling's not as strong.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Kinda easy for a Thursday but fun, fun. Saw what was happening with 14A (VERY) and, like yesterday, got the revealer with no letters at all.
    Impressed that all the themers are actual words and I got a big kick out of figuring them all out. It didn't bother me that many were fewer than six letters - it still made for a fun solve.
    Only sticky portion for me was the AROAR/POT crossing. I know next to nothing about snooker and for some reason, AROAR would just not click - I had AR_AR and still nothing! I had to run the alphabet not once, but twice for it to fall.
    Agree with @Rex that there are much better ways to clue ICED, but that was the only thing that annoyed me a bit today. I also agree that the cluing for ARK was quite wonderful.
    Congratulations Timothy on the debut, nice work!

    ReplyDelete
  70. Good puzzle, but I sure sucked at solving it. The names for shades of colors has been a real problem for me lately.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Anonymous7:19 PM

    Just dropped my to be sure that Rex found this “easy” and to say I hated every slogging bit of it,

    ReplyDelete